Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

CeFi vs DeFi: Main Features and Differences in Marketing

Validated Individual Expert

CeFi (Centralized Finance) and DeFi (Decentralized Finance) are financial systems operating with traditional fiat money and cryptocurrency. They are different in their essence and operations, marketing, and interactions with their audiences.

The Difference Between CeFi and DeFi Systems

Centralized Finance products are financial products and services that are offered by centralized financial institutions or platforms.

These products and services are designed to offer users a familiar and centralized experience with a range of features and functionalities that are not yet available in the decentralized finance (DeFi) space.

CeFi refers to traditional economic systems that are centralized and operate through a single entity, such as a bank, brokerage firm, or centralized crypto exchange. Stripe, Revolut, PayPal, Binance, and Kraken are examples of the CeFi system.

DeFi refers to decentralized financial systems that operate on blockchain technology and do not rely on a single centralized entity. DeFi is a rapidly growing space that offers decentralized financial products and services using blockchain technology.

Marketing DeFi products can be challenging as they are relatively new and often more complex than traditional financial products. Examples of DeFi are MakerDAO, Aave, dYdX, PancakeSwap, and Uniswap.

The main difference in the marketing approach between CeFi and DeFi is the emphasis on decentralization and trust.

Decentralized systems are susceptible to the Byzantine Generals Problem, as they lack a dependable source of information and have no way of confirming the information they get from other network users.

In centralized systems, an authority is trusted to disseminate accurate information while preventing the spread of erroneous or fraudulent information across the network.

Banks are trusted in the traditional financial system to provide clients with accurate balances and transaction histories. The central bank or government is authorized to restore faith if a bank tries to deceive or mislead its consumers.

Marketing of the CeFi products

There are differences between marketing efforts, money spent, the target audience, and the channels used.

In marketing, CeFi products focus on convenience, stability, and reliability. Centralized institutions offer CeFi products, and marketing efforts may focus on the trust and security of using a well-established financial institution.

This can be particularly appealing to investors who are wary of the relatively new and untested nature of DeFi products.

CeFi products may be marketed as more user-friendly than DeFi products, particularly for users who are less familiar with blockchain. Marketing efforts may emphasize the ease of use of these products and how they can be integrated into people’s financial lives.

Here you can see an example of brand promise from indó iceland bank:

CeFi marketing is more geared toward a mainstream audience, spending money to direct advertising:

  • banners on websites
  • buying traffic
  • targeted advertising on social media
  • influence marketing
  • offline print advertising
  • sponsorship

For example, Santander bank became Ferrari’s Premium Partner.

They say, global sponsorships raise awareness and provide strong international brand visibility, together with strength and robustness worldwide, while local sponsorships enable us to connect with customers in a physical and emotional way in each country.

In the next two images, you can see a comparison of the use of paid advertising by CeFi company Binance and DeFi company Uniswap:

As you can see, the crypto exchange uses paid banner advertising and paid keywords in its marketing. Of course, the Binance marketing team uses many other paid promotion tools, but this is the most obvious and the one that is easy to compare using open data.

Here you can see Uniswap traffic data. Compared to Binance, this product uses much less paid advertising. Read below on how to market DeFi products.

Marketing of the CeFi products requires a focus on trust, traditional investment opportunities, ease of use, and competitive fees and rates. By emphasizing these key benefits, financial institutions can appeal to a wide range of investors and compete in a crowded market.

If you have a big budget, you run this market. If not, my condolences. I know many companies with poor service and products can buy a lot of advertising and anyway get their piece of the pie.

Marketing of the DeFi Products

In contrast with CeFi, DeFi marketing may highlight the benefits of decentralization, such as increased security, transparency, and accessibility.

DeFi marketing emphasizes the innovative and forward-thinking nature of decentralized finance, as it represents a departure from traditional financial systems and has the potential to disrupt and transform the financial industry.

DeFi marketing focuses on early adopters and crypto enthusiasts, using online channels, such as social media, forums, and blogs like HackerNoon, Reddit, and Mirror, to reach its target audience.

Here is an example of Uniswap’s profile on Reddit. Their community is in the top 5%, and it’s really cool.

Social media is a powerful tool for marketing DeFi products, and projects can leverage influencers and thought leaders in the space to help spread the word and generate buzz around their products.

Marketers in DeFi spend a lot of time and effort to build a strong community by:

  • conducting hackathons and meetups
  • AMA sessions on Twitter or YouTube
  • running community chats on Discord and Telegram

AMA is an acronym for “Ask Me Anything.” During an AMA, community members ask questions live and have a dialogue with the host or other participants on enablement topics such as using products, onboarding, tips & tricks, etc.

Here is the announcement of the AMA session by 3HOUSE on Twitter:

Here is an example of the Celo blockchain project account with big number of subscribers on Twitter:

DeFi projects can offer incentives and rewards such as token airdrops, staking rewards, and liquidity mining rewards to attract users and incentivize them to use their products.

DeFi is not simple yet for understanding the main mass of users. Effective marketing of products should include educational content such as blog posts, videos, and tutorials that help users understand the products and how to use them.

For example, Alchemy created their University for people who want to master web3 professions:

Marketing DeFi products requires a focus on education, decentralization, benefits, social media, and incentives. By emphasizing these key strategies, DeFi companies and projects can effectively market their products and grow their user base.

Also, product PR from the technical side and personal brands of founders give additional value.

Summary

When marketing CeFi and DeFi, it’s essential to understand the unique advantages of each model and tailor your messaging accordingly.

Whether emphasizing security and ease of use for CeFi or decentralization and transparency for DeFi, make sure to communicate the benefits of your platform to your target audience.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Pandu Financial Group received the first round of strategic equity investment of tens of millions of Hong Kong dollars, led by Longling Capital

    Pando Financial Group announced it has received tens of millions of Hong Kong dollars in strategic equity investment led by Longling Investment. Pando Financial Group stated that it plans to use the newly injected funds for key growth areas, including market expansion, innovative product development, key talent recruitment, and technology upgrades, aiming to accelerate the layout of opportunities in the era of virtual assets through these strategic initiatives. Currently, the group's asset management scale has reached $500 million. Pando Asset, a subsidiary of Pando Financial Group, established its headquarters in Zurich in 2022 and issued the Pando 6 spot virtual asset fund (Bitcoin/Ethereum spot ETPs) on the Swiss Exchange. Another subsidiary of Pando Financial Group, Pando Limited, obtained licenses from the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong, including Type 1 (securities trading), Type 4 (advising on securities), and Type 9 (asset management), as well as public fund qualifications, and was approved to manage investment portfolios with more than 10% invested in virtual assets and issued several excellent performance actively managed ETF products.

  • Hong Kong Monetary Authority launches industry consultation on “renaming virtual banks as licensed digital banks”

    Hong Kong virtual banks released their annual reports for 2023 last week. The eight virtual banks collectively lost about 2.99 billion yuan last year, a decrease of about 12% compared to the total loss of about 3.4 billion yuan in 2022. In response to the occasional feeling of "unreality" brought about by the term "virtual" in recent years, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority has initiated a consultation on renaming with the eight virtual banks, the Hong Kong Bankers Association, the Hong Kong Restricted Licensed Banks and Deposit-taking Companies Association, with the aim of renaming virtual banks as licensed digital banks, for a period of one month. It is reported that in the Asian region, similar banks have different names in different places. South Korea and Singapore issue licenses under the name of "digital bank", with Singapore further dividing them into digital full banks (DFB) and digital wholesale banks (DWB).

  • Chairman of the Russian State Duma Financial Market Committee: I do not support a complete ban on the circulation of cryptocurrencies in Russia

    Anton Gorelkin, Chairman of the Financial Market Committee of the Russian State Duma, said that he does not support a complete ban on the circulation of cryptocurrency in Russia. He explained in a post on Telegram that this restriction is not intended to ban the use of all cryptocurrencies, but rather to regulate the establishment of cryptocurrency exchange platforms within the legal framework of Russia. Anton Gorelkin also believes that the establishment of a legitimate cryptocurrency infrastructure in Russia is influenced by geopolitical realities, and this requires consideration of factors related to international relations. He further added that allowing such infrastructure may expose Russian companies to Western sanctions. In addition, Anton Gorelkin pointed out that this restriction may be lifted in the future, and users can still use foreign cryptocurrency exchanges and over-the-counter trading services as before. However, the impact on many over-the-counter cryptocurrency services in Moscow is still uncertain.

  • Ethereum L2 TVL is $39.98 billion, of which Base TVL is $5.57 billion

    According to L2BEAT data, the current Ethereum Layer2 TVL is $39.98 billion, with a 7-day increase of 0.69%. The top five TVLs are:

  • Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited: The total market value of Bitcoin and Ethereum futures ETFs reached HK$1.2 billion in the first quarter, with an inflow of HK$592 million

    According to data disclosed by Brian Roberts, head of securities product development at the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, shows that after the approval of virtual asset futures ETFs for public offering in Hong Kong by the China Securities Regulatory Commission on October 31, 2022, three virtual asset futures ETFs investing in Bitcoin and Ethereum futures were listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Since their launch, these ETFs have been popular with investors and have a high trading volume. The daily trading volume has increased from HKD 8.9 million in 2023 to HKD 51.3 million in the first quarter of 2024, and they have also attracted HKD 529 million in capital inflows. As of the end of March 2024, the total market value has reached HKD 1.2 billion, an annual increase of 255%.

  • Cryptocurrency market financing totaled $1.02 billion in April, involving 161 financings

    On May 6th, it was reported that the total financing amount in the cryptocurrency market in April reached 1.02 billion US dollars, involving 161 financing deals. This is slightly lower than the total investment of 1.09 billion US dollars in March, which had 186 deals. However, cryptocurrency venture capital has exceeded 1 billion US dollars for the second consecutive month this year, marking the first time since the end of 2022 for the industry.

  • The total open interest of ETH contracts increased to $10.68 billion

    According to Coinglass data, the total open positions of ETH futures contracts on the entire network are 3.39 million ETH, equivalent to approximately 10.68 billion US dollars. Among them, the open positions of Binance ETH contracts are 1.16 million ETH (approximately 3.64 billion US dollars), ranking first.

  • Suspected MakerDAO multi-signature wallet deposited 750 MKR to Binance 2 hours ago

    According to Spot On Chain monitoring, MakerDAO has been depositing MKR into CEX. Two hours ago, the multi-signature wallet 0xbba (possibly MakerDAO) deposited 750 MKR (approximately $2.19 million) at an average price of $2920 to Binance.

  • BASE network TVL exceeds $1.5 billion

    According to DefiLlama data, BASE Network TVL is currently at $1.527 billion with a 24-hour increase of 0.53%. The top three ecological protocol TVL rankings are as follows: Aerodrome TVL reached $670 million with a 7-day decrease of 7.5%; Uniswap TVL reached $228 million with a 7-day decrease of 3.52%. ExtraFinance TVL reached $104 million with a 7-day decrease of 8.25%;

  • Blockchain Asset Management announces launch of a dedicated blockchain fund for accredited investors

    Blockchain Asset Management, a cryptocurrency fund with a scale of $100 million, announced the launch of an exclusive blockchain fund for qualified investors. The specific amount of funds raised by the fund has not been disclosed yet, but it is said to have reached "eight figures", which means it is in the tens of millions of dollars. In addition, the investment threshold for the new fund is $100,000, and all investors are required to meet the approved standards (annual income exceeding $200,000, net assets exceeding $1 million).