Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

[Temp Check] Burn surplus RetroPGF (+ monetary policy proposals)

Currently, there’s no monetary policy proposal type. So, this is not a proposal, but rather a conversation starter about some serious issues.

This has been completely centralized, as decided by Optimism Foundation. The projections offered at genesis have not been honoured, and current projections 6 are also vague. Confidence in tokens or anything of economic value is derived from predictability and stability - which has been completely undermined in the name of experimentation. There’s billions of dollars at play here, we need to take things more seriously. The entire handling of $OP distribution has been haphazard. I believe $OP can do better with decentralized community checks and balances, and thus there should be monetary policy proposal types.

While there are many errors and problems with the policy, the most obvious issue is - the RetroPGF allocation. I’ve discussed burning it in the past 3, so let’s revisit that topic. As per initial projections announced at genesis, 100% of the RetroPGF (along with Ecosystem Fund) was intended to be allocated by the end of Year 4:

image1920×914 97 KB

However, after nearly 2 years in, only 40 million, or ~4.7% would have been distributed. Current projections 6 are radically different [please see Erratum below, the next figures are wrong], calling for only 140 million OP to be distributed by the end of year 5. This is only 16% of the initial projections, despite the 1 extra year. To be clear, this is a more reasonable projection than the ones initially offered, but that leaves a massive overhang of 700 million $OP tokens. At the end of 5 years, over ~75% of pending unlock (effectively inflation) will be RPGF alone.

It’s obvious that RPGF was severely overallocated at genesis, and >6x gap between initial projections and current projections reflects the magnitude of the error. My recommendation is to burn the ~700 million OP that was overallocated to RPGF, while honouring the current projections till year 5.

[Erratum: As @danftz points out below, it’s actually 340 million OP per the projections, with the overhang being ~500M OP, not ~700M OP. I’d prefer to see 140M OP be distributed, as that’s plenty for RPGF.]

To be clear, this does not mean the end of RPGF at the end of year 5. 5 years in for the OP Collective, and nearly a decade in for the Optimism Foundation and its predecessor Plasma Group at large, it’s about time to consolidate and become economically sustainable. Beyond that point, a ~75% overhang is unjustified. So, RPGF will continue, but in a different form, that’s sustainable:

  • Share of protocol revenues (sequencer, MEV, OP stack chains etc.)
  • Share of regular inflation (currently 0%, but we can bump it to 1% or 2% after year 5)

This will lead to:

  • A more sustainable RPGF
  • Clarity in the massive RPGF overhang, leading to increase confidence and long-term value in the $OP token, leading to higher economic security and sustainability
  • Increase in net value of $OP tokens by ~16% due to the lower supply

These are just my thoughts, please voice your opinion below.

PS: I’ve changed the title to “Burn surplus RetroPGF” from “Burn RetroPGF”

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Hong Kong Monetary Authority launches industry consultation on “renaming virtual banks as licensed digital banks”

    Hong Kong virtual banks released their annual reports for 2023 last week. The eight virtual banks collectively lost about 2.99 billion yuan last year, a decrease of about 12% compared to the total loss of about 3.4 billion yuan in 2022. In response to the occasional feeling of "unreality" brought about by the term "virtual" in recent years, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority has initiated a consultation on renaming with the eight virtual banks, the Hong Kong Bankers Association, the Hong Kong Restricted Licensed Banks and Deposit-taking Companies Association, with the aim of renaming virtual banks as licensed digital banks, for a period of one month. It is reported that in the Asian region, similar banks have different names in different places. South Korea and Singapore issue licenses under the name of "digital bank", with Singapore further dividing them into digital full banks (DFB) and digital wholesale banks (DWB).

  • Chairman of the Russian State Duma Financial Market Committee: I do not support a complete ban on the circulation of cryptocurrencies in Russia

    Anton Gorelkin, Chairman of the Financial Market Committee of the Russian State Duma, said that he does not support a complete ban on the circulation of cryptocurrency in Russia. He explained in a post on Telegram that this restriction is not intended to ban the use of all cryptocurrencies, but rather to regulate the establishment of cryptocurrency exchange platforms within the legal framework of Russia. Anton Gorelkin also believes that the establishment of a legitimate cryptocurrency infrastructure in Russia is influenced by geopolitical realities, and this requires consideration of factors related to international relations. He further added that allowing such infrastructure may expose Russian companies to Western sanctions. In addition, Anton Gorelkin pointed out that this restriction may be lifted in the future, and users can still use foreign cryptocurrency exchanges and over-the-counter trading services as before. However, the impact on many over-the-counter cryptocurrency services in Moscow is still uncertain.

  • Ethereum L2 TVL is $39.98 billion, of which Base TVL is $5.57 billion

    According to L2BEAT data, the current Ethereum Layer2 TVL is $39.98 billion, with a 7-day increase of 0.69%. The top five TVLs are:

  • Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited: The total market value of Bitcoin and Ethereum futures ETFs reached HK$1.2 billion in the first quarter, with an inflow of HK$592 million

    According to data disclosed by Brian Roberts, head of securities product development at the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, shows that after the approval of virtual asset futures ETFs for public offering in Hong Kong by the China Securities Regulatory Commission on October 31, 2022, three virtual asset futures ETFs investing in Bitcoin and Ethereum futures were listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Since their launch, these ETFs have been popular with investors and have a high trading volume. The daily trading volume has increased from HKD 8.9 million in 2023 to HKD 51.3 million in the first quarter of 2024, and they have also attracted HKD 529 million in capital inflows. As of the end of March 2024, the total market value has reached HKD 1.2 billion, an annual increase of 255%.

  • Cryptocurrency market financing totaled $1.02 billion in April, involving 161 financings

    On May 6th, it was reported that the total financing amount in the cryptocurrency market in April reached 1.02 billion US dollars, involving 161 financing deals. This is slightly lower than the total investment of 1.09 billion US dollars in March, which had 186 deals. However, cryptocurrency venture capital has exceeded 1 billion US dollars for the second consecutive month this year, marking the first time since the end of 2022 for the industry.

  • The total open interest of ETH contracts increased to $10.68 billion

    According to Coinglass data, the total open positions of ETH futures contracts on the entire network are 3.39 million ETH, equivalent to approximately 10.68 billion US dollars. Among them, the open positions of Binance ETH contracts are 1.16 million ETH (approximately 3.64 billion US dollars), ranking first.

  • Suspected MakerDAO multi-signature wallet deposited 750 MKR to Binance 2 hours ago

    According to Spot On Chain monitoring, MakerDAO has been depositing MKR into CEX. Two hours ago, the multi-signature wallet 0xbba (possibly MakerDAO) deposited 750 MKR (approximately $2.19 million) at an average price of $2920 to Binance.

  • BASE network TVL exceeds $1.5 billion

    According to DefiLlama data, BASE Network TVL is currently at $1.527 billion with a 24-hour increase of 0.53%. The top three ecological protocol TVL rankings are as follows: Aerodrome TVL reached $670 million with a 7-day decrease of 7.5%; Uniswap TVL reached $228 million with a 7-day decrease of 3.52%. ExtraFinance TVL reached $104 million with a 7-day decrease of 8.25%;

  • ZeroLend will open ZERO airdrop claims on Linea at 15:30 on May 6th, and will take a snapshot closer to TGE

    On May 6th, ZeroLend, a decentralized lending protocol, announced that ZERO airdrop claiming will be opened on Linea at 15:30 on May 6th, and ZERO trading will be opened at 16:00. The Zero Gravity points and earlyZERO (1 earlyZERO = 1 ZERO) accumulated by users will be automatically converted to ZERO and displayed on the reward page. In terms of airdrop distribution, ZeroLend will distribute 18% of the token supply to the community, of which 5% will be allocated to Zero Gravity participants and 13% will be allocated to earlyZERO holders. ZeroLend stated that a snapshot will be taken near TGE. ZERO stakers will receive voting rights, staking rewards, and potential future airdrops based on their voting power. If staked for more than 1 year, a staking bonus of 5%-20% can be obtained.

  • It is estimated that there are about 28 days left before ETC production cuts

    Data shows that Ethereum Classic (ETC) is expected to undergo a reduction in production on June 3, 2024, which is about 28 days and 6 hours away. The current block reward is 2.56 ETC, and after the reduction, it will be 2.048 ETC.