Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Four Ways to DYOR on DeFi Yield Farms

TL;DR

Yield farming is the practice of using one’s crypto assets to generate passive income or yield. It typically involves providing liquidity to DeFi protocols, or lending or staking crypto assets in exchange for rewards. Some yield farmers use all of them simultaneously. As with all crypto opportunities, yield farming is not without its risks. Impermanent loss, bugs in smart contracts or protocols, and exorbitant gas fees are some risks yield farmers face.

Hence, yield farmers must do thorough research before committing their funds to a yield farm. Some common ways to do so include investigating the team, security, type of token, and timeline associated with the investment. While DYOR (doing your own research) cannot entirely prevent crypto losses, it can help to mitigate risks.

Introduction

In its simplest form, yield farming uses idle crypto assets to earn crypto interest. Through smart contracts, owners can lend their crypto to others and receive rewards in return. Within the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem, there are a few ways to generate yield from crypto, the most common ones being:

  1. Lending assets using a crypto lending protocol.
  2. Staking cryptocurrency on a protocol.
  3. Becoming a liquidity provider (LP) for a DeFi protocol (e.g. decentralized exchange (DEX)) and receiving LP rewards (see LP tokens).

Many yield farmers use one or more of the above methods to build a passive income stream. Like other DeFi opportunities, however, yield farming has its risks. Whether you intend to become a yield farmer or are just interested in its mechanics, it's good to do your due diligence.

The Risks of Yield Farming

Impermanent loss

Probably the most prominent risk in yield farming and the DeFi space in general is impermanent loss. When crypto owners participate in yield farming, they often lock up their crypto for a specified period, making those assets relatively illiquid.

Impermanent loss occurs when the price of your tokens changes from the price at which you deposited them into the pool. The bigger the change, the bigger the loss, regardless of the price's direction.

Although yield farming fees earned may help offset the loss, this is not always the case and can present a major risk. If you want to learn more, read our in-depth explanation of impermanent loss.

Hacks

Smart contracts control DeFi protocols and a single bug in the smart contract code could cause the value of a token to plummet to zero. This risk is compounded by the fact that a malicious hacker could exploit the bug or security issue to manipulate the project.

Scams

Someone with bad intentions and the right skillset can create a DeFi platform and pass it off as a legitimate yield farming site. After all, DeFi projects are open-source, transparent, and permissionless, meaning anyone can copy the underlying code and create a new project. While early adopters are typically rewarded more handsomely, think twice before doing so, as high rewards come with high risks.

Newly launched yield farming platforms may be harder to research as user reviews and information on them tend to be limited. Be especially cautious with such platforms as you may be unable to withdraw your deposited funds or claim your rewards even if you change your mind after committing to such a platform.

High gas fees

When a network is congested, it usually leads to a rise in gas fees. Such unprecedented spikes affect yield farmers with less funds, as gas fees can eat into their earned fees. Even if they choose to leave their assets in the pool, other risks like impermanent loss and liquidation may still affect them.

Common Ways to DYOR

Security

Ensuring the security of yield farming and DeFi protocols is critical in preventing malicious attacks. To reduce the risk of such attacks, it is essential to ascertain that a reputable source has audited the smart contract code. Look for DeFi projects that have had their smart contracts thoroughly audited.

Countless DeFi projects start by forking from successful DeFi protocols such as UniSwap. However, many fail due to network effects or a lack of liquidity, among other reasons. Worse, some are even deliberately created as scams. For example, a fraudulent team may create a fork, try to attract liquidity to it, then disappear with the newly acquired tokens.

It is also important to know the Total Value Locked (TVL) in the project, which is the total amount currently locked in the protocol. If the TVL seems suspiciously low, it's an indicator that even less capital is locked up in the protocol, which in turn means less yield for farmers.

Token

Different pools offer different opportunities for various assets, including stablecoins and blue-chip tokens (i.e., tokens from established blockchain projects such as Bitcoin and Ethereum). Protocols can also distribute their own tokens to stakers and liquidity providers.

It's essential to remember that a protocol can bind its token to its services in several ways. For instance, it may use the token as a marketing tactic to attract more users. Therefore, always be sure of what token you’ll receive from yield farming.

Timeline

New DeFi protocols often offer higher rewards to early adopters in efforts to increase liquidity. It works also as an incentive for being willing to take a risk by investing in and using a new or untested product or service.

However, while early adoption may lead to greater rewards, it is also a high-risk venture — the yield farming protocol may not be successful. As such, the money and time invested may not be recouped.

Yield farmers should weigh their options carefully and consider all the factors, as well as other opportunities. Due to possible token inflation and the resulting price decline, it's not sustainable for new DeFi protocols to offer high rewards for long periods, especially if they reward farmers using their native tokens.

Team

When browsing for information, look out for errors from the main yield farming website – mistakes can indicate a sloppy or worse, fraudulent team. Ideally, the website should be well-designed, have no typos or broken links, and look professional. Another way to assess a team's reliability is whether or not it is subject to regular audits conducted by an external and independent auditor.

A team should be well-balanced and comprise a healthy mix of entrepreneurs, product managers, developers, software engineers, marketing professionals, and financial experts. It’s a bonus if the project also has renowned advisors on its board.

If you can, conduct research on individual team members as well. For starters, check their social media accounts to learn about their past achievements, as well as their activity on platforms like LinkedIn, GitHub, Reddit, TradingView, and YouTube.

How they interact on social media can indicate their skillset, experience, and influence. Generally speaking, an established team with a good reputation is less likely to be running a scam.

Closing Thoughts

Yield farming can be a viable passive income strategy for those experienced at effective risk management. However, given the volatile nature of yield farming and crypto markets in general, it requires vigilance, effort, and time to plan a robust yield farming strategy.

If you're considering yield farming, the aforementioned approaches can be used as a starting point to mitigate risks. In addition, you should dive deeper and do your due diligence before investing in any financial opportunity.

Read more: https://academy.binance.com/en/articles/four-ways-to-dyor-on-defi-yield-farms

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Web3 AI platform ChainML completes $6.2 million seed round of financing

    Web3 AI platform ChainML has announced the completion of a $6.2 million seed round of expansion financing, led by Hack VC, with participation from Inception Capital, HTX Ventures, Figment Capital, Hypersphere Ventures, and Alumni Ventures. The platform also announced the launch of its agent-based foundation layer, Theoriq.

  • Metaverse project Baby Shark Universe completes seed round financing

    Baby Shark Universe project, a metaverse project, has completed a seed round of financing with a valuation of $34 million. Participating investors include Animoca Brands, CREDIT SCEND, Sui Foundation, Comma3 Ventures, Creditcoin, GM Ventures, Neuler, Notch Ventures, X+, and Planetarium. The specific amount has not been disclosed, and the new funds will be used for development and global marketing. According to reports, Baby Shark Universe is an open-world role-playing game where players can create their own game content (items, maps), enjoy content created by other players, and expand the game's narrative based on their choices and actions.

  • Hong Kong Stock Exchange Confirms Crypto ETFs Unavailable to Mainland Chinese Investors

    According to Coindesk, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange has confirmed that cryptocurrency ETFs are not available to mainland Chinese investors. Hong Kong's cryptocurrency ETFs will provide a means to bypass capital controls in mainland China due to their unique physical redemption model.

  • Web3 social infrastructure UXLINK completes $5 million in financing

    Web3 social infrastructure UXLINK announced the completion of a new round of $5 million financing, led by SevenX Ventures, INCE Capital, and HashKey Capital. It is reported that UXLINK's total financing has now exceeded $15 million.

  • Chinese police bust underground bank using cryptocurrency for illegal currency conversion

    Chinese police have arrested six people for running an illegal currency conversion operation that used cryptocurrency to handle around $296 million. The operation was discovered by the Public Security Bureau of Panshi City, Jilin, and involved an "underground bank" that exploited the anonymity and ease of cross-border transfers offered by crypto. The operation used domestic accounts to receive and transfer funds, and exchanged between the yuan and South Korean won. The service was used by Korean purchasing agents, e-commerce firms, and import/export companies, among others.

  • Hong Kong Securities Regulatory Commission warns the public to beware of a suspicious asset investment product called "LENA Network"

    Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission warned the public to be wary of a suspicious virtual asset investment product called "LENA Network". The product involves pledging and lending arrangements related to virtual assets, and claims to provide high returns to investors. This investment product has not been approved by the Securities and Futures Commission for sale to the Hong Kong public. The Securities and Futures Commission notes that the Hong Kong public can access information about the product and contact the product through the Internet. The Securities and Futures Commission advises against trusting those "too good to be true" investment opportunities and remaining vigilant when making investment decisions.

  • Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission: The Anti-Money Laundering Ordinance applies to the virtual asset industry

    The "virtual currency to ETF" mechanism in Hong Kong has raised concerns about money laundering. The industry believes that the review difficulty, such as KYT (Know Your Token), is high. Some individuals with mainland backgrounds are trying to conduct small-scale "virtual currency to ETF" transactions, taking the opportunity to "whiten" their own holdings of ether and bitcoin through forms such as personal accounts. They have also deployed some virtual currencies to Hong Kong's virtual currency exchanges and will decide whether to increase capital in the future depending on the situation. When responding to relevant questions, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission emphasized that in the operation of ETF products, every link in the entire virtual asset ecosystem, including fund companies, custodians, asset trading platforms, participating brokers, etc., must be licensed or recognized institutions and strictly comply with requirements such as asset custody, liquidity, valuation, information disclosure, and investor education. The "Anti-Money Laundering Ordinance" of the Securities and Futures Commission also stipulates that financial institutions and designated non-financial enterprises and industry personnel must comply with customer due diligence and record-keeping requirements, and relevant regulations apply to the virtual asset industry.

  • TON community member: Some TON wallets received virtual account NFTs starting with "888", which is a phishing project

    On May 13th, according to a member of the TON official community, a new NFT with a virtual number starting with "888" has been added to the TON wallet. However, the transaction fee for each transfer is as high as 1 TON, which is caused by the fishing project changing the Gas.

  • Swiss Crypto Bank Amina: Listing Ethereum as a Security Could Cause Many Crypto Teams to Exit the Space

    Swiss encrypted bank Amina stated in the latest "Cryptocurrency Market Monitoring" report that classifying Ethereum as a security could not only bring risks to the entire cryptocurrency market, but also lead to many cryptocurrency teams exiting the field. This determination could hinder the development of the cryptocurrency market and potentially reverse progress made over the years. In addition, the US SEC is likely to delay its decision on the status of Ethereum, putting the cryptocurrency asset in a "gray area".

  • Ethereum has about $48.05 million in on-chain loan liquidation quota around $2,778

    According to Defi Llama data, there is approximately $48.05 million in on-chain liquidation volume for Ethereum around $2,778.