Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Furio Development Team Make Insane Price Changes and Piss Off All Their Investors

Cryptocurrency, DeFi to be precise, was meant to take power away from the rich and give it back to the poor. Decentralised Finance (DeFi) was meant to be, well, decentralised. No centralised entity was meant to control the platform(s).

So as you can imagine, I was incredibly shocked when I logged on to compound my daily earnings to discover the price had plunged from around $4.50-$5.50 per FUR token to below $1.00.

What the f*ck happened?

As I researched the crash I discovered it wasn’t due to a massive sell-off.

No, the Furio devs decided it would be great to lower the price to “save” the project. Potentially having the opposite effect, as investors saw the price drop and panic sold their bags.

WTF is this crap?

Now, if you’re wondering what the hell Furio is, let me tell you.

Furio is a high-risk/high-reward daily ROI app where you can earn between 0.5–2.5% daily return in the native FUR token.

Now, before you tell me how unsustainable that is, let me explain how this project became sustainable.

The Furio team have given us investors a crash course in sustainability.

  • First, you create a project with a “stable” coin price between $4.50–5.50.
  • Second, you lure investors to your project with promises of riches.
  • Third, you adjust the contract when you realise it is not sustainable to try and save the project.
  • Four, you run with your profits and leave the project to die.

Jokes aside, step four hasn’t happened. And I don’t think it will either, I’m not FUDDING my own bag, let me explain.

Furio devs made the tough decision to try and save the project by reducing the price. Yes, that sucks. They shouldn’t have the ability to change the price. They are planning on making the contract immutable. Until that point, Furio is centralized IMO.

This price adjustment was undoubtedly a tough decision, but the right one.

It was much better than the other two options that Furio stated:

  • 1: Freeze the contracts
  • 2: Carry on “as is” and watch the LMS get abused to zero

And I believe that this decision will help Furio become great once again. I will take the short-term loss, for those long-term (potential) gains.

The aftermath

Look, a lot of people were pissed when their FUR portfolio’s devalued by 78% overnight. Then add this comment from the Furio dev team onto the raging fire pit:

Since the issues with FTX and the pressures this has created, we have been staggered by the immaturity of certain members of the DeFi community.”

Then you’ve got a recipe for a very, very pissed-off community.

The Furio team should have taken responsibility for their actions instead of passing them off to the community and the market/FTX situation. Maybe they missed the memo about “the customer is king”? Anyway, once the dust had settled the dev had a chance to explain why this change had been made.

The project was getting rinsed to the tune of around $80,000 daily. With $2.4 million remaining in the LMS funds pool, the contract would have been emptied in less than a month. Everyone saw the contract being drained and followed suit like lemmings jumping off a cliff. So understandably, the devs had to take the initiative and change the contract/price to save the project. IMO that’s better than pulling the rug.

Speak the truth

Honestly, I’m unsure about this project. I’ve lost some trust as the devs keep on changing the contract. This is the kind of foul play that shouldn’t exist in DeFi. Yet, it is for a reason. So to regain the trust of the community, the devs should:

  • Guarantee that the LMS will stay in the new range of $0.90-$1.10
  • Involve the community in major decisions
  • Don’t set release dates for new projects until they are 99% ready to launch

Losing money is bad enough. It’s much worse when the investors lose confidence in the project. Angry investors spread bad news, and bad news is bad for business.

Time to move on

Humans hate change. They hate them even more, when there’s money at risk. These changes sucked for every single Furio investor. But on the bright side. If they had kept the price, the project would have died before Christmas hit. Then everyone would suffer huge losses without being able to scrape back some earnings. This change has allowed us to keep earning interest on our investments.

Furio devs could have let the project die and run off to start a new project. Instead, they stuck around to try and save the project and give it a future: a tough decision, no doubt.

There is a silver lining. You must look past the short-term losses and embrace the potential long-term gains.

Not financial advice. DYOR, don’t listen to random people online.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Farcaster's social client Kiosk completes $10 million financing, led by Electric Capital

    Farcaster's integrated social client Kiosk has announced the completion of a $10 million financing round on the X platform, led by Electric Capital, with participation from a16z Crypto, USV, and Variant Fund. Kiosk aims to promote community building and commerce within applications, enabling creators to establish communities, share rich media content, mint NFTs, interact with like-minded individuals, and seamlessly customize channel economics, while emphasizing the integration of on-chain assets into social interactions and envisioning a more inclusive and interconnected Web3 experience.

  • A whale sold 224 WBTC worth $14.4 million in the past three hours

    According to on-chain analyst @ai_9684xtpa, address 0x486...1505e sold 224 WBTC tokens worth $14.4 million through Cowswap in the past three hours, making a profit of $830,000 (selling at an average price of $64,203). The seller had bought 371 WBTC tokens at an average price of $60,504 between November 2023 and April 2024, and still holds 280 WBTC tokens.

  • CryptoQuant CEO: BTC needs to remain above $80,000 for miners to remain profitable after halving

    Bitcoin mining revenue significantly decreased in May due to the impact of the fourth Bitcoin halving event. On May 1st, the total revenue from block rewards and transaction fees reached a new low of only $26.3 million.CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju calculated that, based on current conditions, Bitcoin needs to stay above $80,000 for miners to remain profitable after the halving. However, most miners have taken proactive measures to upgrade their mining equipment to lower long-term operating costs and remain competitive.

  • BTC returns to above 65,000 USDT, up 2.08% in 24 hours

    OKX market shows that BTC has returned to above 65000 USDT, now reporting 65102 USDT, with a 24-hour increase of 2.08%.

  • Hundre Finance attackers have withdrawn 162.2 ETH worth of crypto assets from Curve

    According to PeckShield monitoring, the attacker of Hundre Finance withdrew 784,000 3Crv from Curve and exchanged it for 273 ETH. In addition, they also exchanged 305.6 WOO, 39 PAXG, 200,000 FRAX, and 100,000 DAI, totaling 162.2 ETH. The attacker then bridged 1,034 ETH (2.17 million USD), 842.8K DAI, 1.11 million USDT, 1.27 million USDC, and 457.3 FRAX from Optimism to Ethereum. They also exchanged a total of 480,000 USDC for 142.6 WETH, 306 WOO, and 39 PAXG. They also exchanged 1.11 million USDT for 500.3 thousand USD worth of DAI and 613.8 thousand USD worth of FRAX. Additionally, on April 15, 2023, approximately 786,000 USD worth of USDC was added to Curve3Pool.

  • LayerZero co-founder: "Self-reporting of witch activities" is not aimed at individuals, but at industrial witch studios

    Bryan Pellegrino, co-founder and CEO of LayerZero, stated on social media that the "Self-Report Sybil Activity" is not targeting individual users, but rather large industrial witch farms (studios).Earlier, LayerZero Labs launched the "Self-Report Sybil Activity" plan, which allows witch addresses to self-report related addresses on a designated page and receive an expected allocation of 15%, without answering any questions. The deadline is May 17th, 19:59:59.

  • Argentina’s House of Representatives Passes Bill to Regularize Cryptocurrency Taxation

    The Argentine Chamber of Deputies has passed a cryptocurrency tax normalization bill aimed at advancing a series of important government reforms. The bill introduces the possibility of regularizing previously undeclared cryptocurrency assets, up to a maximum of $100,000, without paying government collection fees. However, if the value of cryptocurrency assets exceeds this limit, the government will apply preferential tax rates based on the taxpayer's declaration date.

  • GNUS on Fantom was attacked, with a loss of about $1.27 million

    According to Beosin's monitoring, GNUS on Fantom was attacked, resulting in a loss of approximately $1.27 million. GNUS stated on the X platform that due to recent vulnerabilities, hackers were able to mint fake GNUS tokens on Fantom, transfer them to Ethereum and Polygon through the Axelar Bridge, and sell them to existing liquidity pools. We will take a snapshot of the blocks before the exploit. To ensure fairness, please do not purchase GNUS tokens after the exploit, as we will issue new tokens.

  • Pandu Financial Group received the first round of strategic equity investment of tens of millions of Hong Kong dollars, led by Longling Capital

    Pando Financial Group announced it has received tens of millions of Hong Kong dollars in strategic equity investment led by Longling Investment. Pando Financial Group stated that it plans to use the newly injected funds for key growth areas, including market expansion, innovative product development, key talent recruitment, and technology upgrades, aiming to accelerate the layout of opportunities in the era of virtual assets through these strategic initiatives. Currently, the group's asset management scale has reached $500 million. Pando Asset, a subsidiary of Pando Financial Group, established its headquarters in Zurich in 2022 and issued the Pando 6 spot virtual asset fund (Bitcoin/Ethereum spot ETPs) on the Swiss Exchange. Another subsidiary of Pando Financial Group, Pando Limited, obtained licenses from the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong, including Type 1 (securities trading), Type 4 (advising on securities), and Type 9 (asset management), as well as public fund qualifications, and was approved to manage investment portfolios with more than 10% invested in virtual assets and issued several excellent performance actively managed ETF products.

  • Market News: South Africa authorizes 75 companies as cryptocurrency service providers

    According to Jinshi news, South Africa has authorized 75 companies as cryptocurrency service providers.