Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Bitcoin NFTs Are on the Rise — What Does This Mean for Miners?

An unprecedented phenomenon has shaken up the Bitcoin community in the last few weeks: NFTs.

Yes, you read that right. By leveraging features added in the SegWit and Taproot upgrades, thousands of users are now “minting” NFTs called Ordinals on the Bitcoin network through a process called inscription.

However, this newly discovered possibility has greatly polarized the community, and while some are enthusiastic about Bitcoin having new functionalities, others remain reluctant to accept this new trend.

One thing’s for certain: the craze for these Bitcoin NFTs has driven increased activity to the network, leading to a spike in transaction fees and, therefore, providing additional revenue for miners.

In this article, we’ll take a deep dive into Bitcoin Ordinals, explain how they work, and analyze their potential effects on the Bitcoin network and mining industry.

Bitcoin Ordinals: Understanding the Basics

Ordinals are a new open source project that allow users to inscribe data on each individual satoshi.

Remember, satoshis — or sats for short — are the minimum divisible unit of a bitcoin. One bitcoin contains exactly 100,000,000 sats.

The new Ordinals project enables Bitcoin node operators to imbue a single satoshi with unique data of any kind — including smart contracts, which enables the creation of NFTs.

In other words, an individual satoshi can be inscribed with arbitrary content, creating a unique Bitcoin-native digital artifact that can be held in Bitcoin wallets and transferred using Bitcoin transactions.

One of the proposals for the satoshi symbol.

In turn, these inscriptions are as durable, immutable, secure, and decentralized as Bitcoin itself.

As a consequence, “minting” these NFTs on Bitcoin doesn’t require a side-chain, token, or contract of any kind. It can be done natively on Bitcoin without any additional changes to the network.

Differences Between Ordinals and ERC NFTs

NFTs have been around for a while now, and were one of the most popular trends during the last bull market.

So, why is everyone so excited about NFTs on Bitcoin, then? Besides the fact that they’re on the most popular and largest blockchain network in the world, they are also fundamentally different from previous NFT standards.

NFTs on Ethereum and other EVMs often refer to off-chain data on the Interplanetary File System (IPFS) which is a decentralized file storage system.

Yet, these NFTs can be modified using dynamic metadata to enhance image quality, for example. Some NFT projects even update the metadata of individual NFTs to ensure the latest, higher-quality image.

While these NFTs can be immutable, the metadata they point to rarely is. It can even be deleted, leaving holders with nothing but a token containing broken links.

According to Casey Rodarmor — the Ordinals project developer — Ethereum NFTs are “plagued with end-user security vulnerabilities.”

It is commonplace to blind-sign transactions, grant third-party apps unlimited permissions over a user’s NFTs, and interact with complex and unpredictable smart contracts. This creates a minefield of hazards for Ethereum NFT users.

On the other hand, Bitcoin NFTs — or, as Rodarmor refers to them, digital artifacts — mitigate these risks since all data is recorded immediately on-chain.

Plus, Ordinals do not include author royalties, unlike NFTs. Rodarmor believes that Ordinals are designed to mirror what NFTs should be, occasionally are, and what inscriptions always are, by definition.

This implies that Ordinals on Bitcoin could represent not just a cultural shift for Bitcoin but also a technical improvement over NFTs.

Ordinals Craze Improves Mining Profitability

While the community remains polarized towards Ordinals — some argue they’re positive innovation, while others claim they’re a waste of blockspace and sats — there is one party that has been benefited from this trend’s collateral effect: Bitcoin miners.

After the launch of Ordinals and their sudden increase in popularity, Bitcoin users have made over 150,000 inscriptions in a month. Now, inscribing data into Bitcoin requires ample block space, which is a critical factor in determining transaction fees.

In short, Bitcoin transaction fees depend on how much space is available on the next block and how fast the user wants it to be completed.

If you want your transaction to go through during periods of high traffic, you can choose to pay higher fees to get it pushed through faster.The less blockspace there is, the more you’ll have to pay to get your transaction included.

Well, with users inscribing significant amounts of data with Ordinals, blockspace has become scarcer. As a result, transaction fees have increased and, naturally, it’s miners who are profiting from this.

Total revenue from transaction fees has reached a daily maximum of $607.7K since the launch of Ordinals, while median transaction fees have jumped from $0.22 to a maximum of $0.78.

This, along with a positive market performance, has allowed miners to enjoy a rather unusual source of additional revenue, reaching a daily maximum of $25.63M — the highest since June 2022.

What Can We Expect From Ordinals?

The recent emergence of Ordinals and their use for minting digital artifacts on Bitcoin has generated mixed reactions from the community.

Regardless of these differing opinions, data indicates that the Bitcoin network has experienced increased activity from these new assets, as well as providing additional revenue for Bitcoin miners.

Whether the broader Bitcoin community decides to embrace or reject this type of cultural shift remains to be seen. For now, Ordinals continue to evolve and capture the interest of more people.

In any case, and regardless of how the argument turns out, Bitcoin inscriptions are not going anywhere anytime soon.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Cointime May 3rd News Express

    1. The 133rd Ethereum ACDC meeting: The goal is to complete the devnet within 7-10 days

  • Paribu wallet address transferred more than 4 trillion PEPE, worth about 31 million US dollars

    According to Whale Alert monitoring, the Paribu wallet address transferred 4,049,371,347,309 PEPE tokens worth approximately $31,091,073 via the Ethereum blockchain at around 17:20 today, and all tokens were transferred to an address starting with "0xa23c".

  • Huaxia Virtual Asset ETF's AUM exceeds HK$1 billion, while Bosera and Harvest AUM both exceed HK$500 million

    According to the latest virtual asset ETF asset management scale data from HKEX as of May 3rd:1. Huaxia Ether ETF has an asset management scale of HKD 146.16 million, and Huaxia Bitcoin ETF has reached HKD 880.25 million, with a total amount exceeding HKD 1 billion, reaching HKD 1.02641 billion;2. Bosera HashKey Ether ETF has an asset management scale of HKD 96.59 million, and Bosera HashKey Bitcoin ETF has reached HKD 478.09 million, with a total of HKD 574.58 million;3. Harvest Ether ETF has an asset management scale of HKD 89.97 million, and the encrypted Bitcoin ETF has reached HKD 449.39 million, with a total of HKD 539.36 million.

  • FRIEND fell below $3, and the ecosystem TVL dropped to the $30 million range

    According to DexScreener data, the trading price of friend.tech tokens has fallen below $3 and is currently at $2.31. The current circulating supply is approximately 14.5 million. According to DeFiLlama data, the friend.tech ecosystem's TVL has dropped to the $30 million range, with a 13.6% decline over the past 7 days. Friend.tech was launched on the Ethereum Layer 2 network Base in August of last year. The ecosystem's TVL had once surpassed $50 million and is currently the 9th largest protocol on the Base chain.

  • Animoca Brands: MOCA token distribution is planned to take place around May 24

    Animoca Brands officially announced that the distribution of MOCA tokens is planned to take place around May 24th. The token release information includes:

  • NFT lending platform Blend’s total transaction volume exceeded US$6 billion, with more than 650,000 loans

    The latest data from Dune shows that the total transaction volume of Blend, an NFT lending platform under Blur, has exceeded 6 billion US dollars, reaching 6,048,459,706 US dollars at the time of writing, with a total of 659,353 loans; the total number of independent borrowing users is 10,458, and the total number of independent lending users is 4,447. The current total active loan amount is 3,347, with an active loan amount of approximately 6,013 ETH.

  • Yuga Labs will migrate the Otherside metaverse to Improbable’s Msquared

    Yuga Labs and Improbable announced the migration of Otherside Metaverse to Improbable's Msquared, which is Improbable's interconnected Metaverse network. By rebuilding Otherside, Yuga Labs will provide the community with the ability to build in large-scale environments and interoperability. Improbable and Yuga Labs also announced other news about the development of Otherside, including a large multiplayer game event in July and the launch of Otherside development toolkit World Builder ODK.

  • friend.tech has opened airdrop token applications, FRIEND is currently priced at $3.34

    According to the official website, friend.tech has opened up the airdrop of the token FRIEND for claiming, with FRIEND currently priced at $3.34. Previously reported, friend.tech will release version 2 and conduct an airdrop on May 3rd.

  • BTC falls below $58,000

    Golden Finance reported that according to OKX market data, BTC briefly touched $57,700 and is now trading at $58,581.53, with a daily decline of 7.15%. The market is volatile, so please be prepared for risk management.

  • DWF Ventures announces investment in blockchain game developer Overworld

    DWF Ventures announced an investment in Overworld, a chain game developer. Overworld recently announced plans to launch another NFT series, and in addition, Overworld will soon launch the main world arena.