Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

A Framework for Measuring Crypto Risk

Validated Media

The crypto investing industry needs a framework for measuring risk.

By “risk” I don’t mean whether a crypto investment is volatile; I mean whether it could collapse entirely.

For example, most would say bitcoin and Ethereum are less risky than a crypto startup. Most would say Tether and USDC (backed by dollars) are less risky than Dai (backed by crypto).

The question for you: What are the risk factors that make you stay away from a crypto investment?

Is it an anonymous founder? A sketchy business model? Forked code?

Here are my warning flags — I’d love to hear yours.

Building a Crypto Risk Model

What we have in mind is something like our Blockchain Investor Scorecard, which was published back in 2018, and has stood the test of time. It’s the scorecard we use for all our crypto ratings, and it really works.

Every question gets a rating from 1 to 5, then you average them up.

While the scorecard has some questions that measure risk (like the team integrity, above), it really measures the strength of the underlying crypto “company.”

It measures potential reward. But how can we measure potential risk?

Specifically, I’m thinking of the crypto companies that have collapsed this year; you know who they are (that last link is a particularly great read).

Could we have seen this coming? Obviously, most didn’t. But could we get better at spotting Jenga towers before they collapse?

I believe we can. Here are a few questions we might ask of any crypto investment: the first steps toward a rigorous framework of measuring risk.

Team Risk

Is the team anonymous?

Anonymous teams are less accountable.

Does the team have a meaningful track record in crypto (“10,000 hours”)? Experienced teams are less risky than novices.

Is there information asymmetry?

Does the team have information you don’t, or is everything on-chain?

Does the team demonstrate scrupulous honesty and integrity?

Are there red flags, yellow flags, or potential conflicts of interest?

Are the leader(s) self-promoters on Twitter?

Large Twitter presences can signal they’re primarily looking out for themselves.

Regulatory Risk

Are investors buying the token, hoping the price will go up?

Forget any claims of “decentralization”: does it smell like a security?

Is the company headquartered in a jurisdiction without clear crypto regulation?

Small, crypto-friendly countries are better than large, unfriendly ones (U.S., China, etc.)

Does the company lead a specific niche of crypto (stablecoins, lending, etc.)?

Category leaders are more likely to be targeted by regulators, especially in the U.S.

Financial Risk

Is the company well-capitalized?

Do they have enough operating cash on hand, and is it liquid (e.g., stablecoins)?

Can you easily explain the company’s business model?

Do you understand how they make money, and can you describe it to others?

Is there an element of “continually increasing returns”?

Do they promise investors, either implicitly or explicitly, that number go up?

Does the company warn regularly about risks?

Do they make it a practice of pointing out potential downsides?

Have other credible investors raised warning flags?

Have you searched for alternate points of view and investigated their concerns?

Smart Contract Risk

Have their smart contracts been audited by a reputable firm?

Are the results publicly available?

Is there a public forum or repository for reporting bugs or issues?

Can you easily find it from their website or Github?

Has the company demonstrated responsiveness to reported issues?

Do they have a track record of responding decisively, or is it radio silence?

Has the company survived stress tests?

Has it held up during one or more market downturns, hacks, or other crises?

Does it rely on cross-chain bridges?

Historically, bridges between blockchains are honeypots for hackers.

Traction Risk

How many active users does the project have?

There’s some safety in numbers. More users generally = more responsibility.

How many followers do they have on social media (Twitter and/or Reddit)?

The court of public opinion can help with public accountability.

Is the project listed on major crypto exchanges?

Big companies want to protect their investors, which provides further safety.

Financial Metrics

What is the expected return?

What is the standard deviation?

What is the Sharpe Ratio?

These can be compared across crypto projects for benchmarking.

Behavioral Risk

Perhaps the most important question is your own integrity. Just as criminals are likely to hang out with other criminals, shady investors are likely to be attracted to shady investments.

I would put this into a category of its own, but since most people think they’re pretty good — even when their behavior isn’t — I’m not sure how reliable it will be. If nothing else, it’s a reminder that our own karma plays a part, too.

The Blockchain Risk Scorecard

Our plan is to put these questions into a new scorecard — call it the Blockchain Risk Scorecard — that we can use alongside our Blockchain Investor Scorecard.

Since risk and reward go hand in hand, our hope is these two tools will provide our crypto investing community even better confidence in our top picks.

Are there any items you’d add? Remove? Change? Let me know, and I’ll share the best feedback in next week’s column.

Go ahead, message me. There’s no risk.

Get Sir John’s crypto investing column every Friday in our Bitcoin Market Journal investor newsletter.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • CFTC Chairman: Cryptocurrencies face an inevitable wave of enforcement actions

    As the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continues to review participants in the cryptocurrency industry including Robinhood, Binance, Coinbase, and Ripple, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chairman Rostin Behnam has warned that enforcement actions are on the rise. Behnam emphasized the lack of regulatory frameworks and transparency in the constantly evolving cryptocurrency industry, which he believes will inevitably lead to more cases of fraud and manipulation. Behnam expects a "cycle of enforcement actions" in the next six months to two years, driven by the rapid appreciation of digital assets and strong interest from retail investors. In addition, Behnam believes that without proper regulation, fraud and manipulation will continue to persist.

  • U.S. Congressman: Upcoming new regulations will combat coin mixers as money laundering tools

    US Congressman Sean Casten stated that new legislation is about to be introduced that will crack down on mixer services as a money laundering tool. Casten also emphasized that USDT is the favorite token of illegal finance.

  • US SEC cryptocurrency regulation sparks partisan divide, with DEBT Box case and mixer regulation in focus

    There were disagreements between the Democratic and Republican parties during a congressional hearing on Tuesday regarding the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) stance on cryptocurrency regulation. Democratic representative Maxine Waters stated that the party will always pursue compliance, protect investors, and maintain market integrity, while SEC Chairman Gary Gensler insisted that most cryptocurrencies should be considered securities. In addition, the SEC's handling of the case of cryptocurrency start-up DEBT Box was questioned, with one federal judge criticizing the agency's behavior as malicious, and two of its lawyers resigning due to mishandling of the case. On the other hand, Republican lawmakers plan to repeal an accounting guidance policy of the SEC, sparking another round of controversy. This hearing also involved regulation of mixers, with a Democratic congressman proposing a bill aimed at combating cryptocurrency mixing services suspected of money laundering. These disputes highlight the complexity of cryptocurrency regulation and the disagreements that exist between government, industry, and regulatory agencies.

  • Vitalik Buterin proposes an alternative to EIP-3074

    Wallet Connect developer Pedro Gomes posted on X platform that Vitalik Buterin proposed an alternative to EIP-3074, which moves from opcode to transaction type methods. This new method benefits from using 4337 infra PLUS to reduce the risks for core developers. Wallet Connect also includes 7377 txn types for smoother migration of EOA to smart accounts.

  • US SEC Chairman: Crypto investors are not getting the proper disclosures they deserve

    Gary Gensler, the Chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), discussed topics such as cryptocurrency during an interview with CNBC on Tuesday. Gensler stated that the SEC regulates $110 trillion in capital markets, with approximately half being in the stock market and the other half in the bond market and other markets. Cryptocurrency is only a small part of our entire market, but it is a huge part of fraud, deception, and problems in our market because most of the content in this field does not comply with our securities law.

  • Bitcoin second-layer network ZKM completes $5 million Pre-A financing, led by OKX Ventures

    According to The Block, Bitcoin layer-two network ZKM announced the completion of a $5 million Pre-A financing, led by OKX Ventures, with participation from Amber, Metis Foundation, Crypto.com, and other companies. It is reported that ZKM is a zero-knowledge proof-based network aimed at unifying blockchains and creating a settlement layer on Ethereum.

  • Botanix Labs announces $11.5 million in funding, with participation from Polychain Capital and others

    Botanix Labs announced that it has raised $11.5 million in funding, with participation from Polychain Capital, Placeholder Capital, Valor Equity Partners, and ABCDE, among others. Other investors include Andrew Kang, Fiskantes, Dan Held, The Crypto Dog, Charlie Spears, Altcoin Sherpa, Dovey Wan, Jebus, Icebergy, Crypto ISO, Davis, Walt Smith, and Domo, the creator of the BRC-20 token standard.

  • Galaxis Completes $10 Million Financing, with Chainlink, Rarestone Capital and Others Participating

    Singaporean Web3 platform Galaxis announced that it had completed a $10 million financing round before the issuance of its tokens. Participants in this round of financing include Chainlink, ENS, Rarestone Capital, Taisu Ventures, and ENS co-founder Nick Johnson. Galaxis claims to be a "post-hype era NFT practical platform" and has previously launched NFT series for celebrities such as DJ SteveAoki and actor ValKilmer. The platform has sold more than 225,000 NFTs, generating sales of over 32,000 ETH (approximately $100 million) in the secondary market, and is currently preparing for large-scale distribution.

  • Australian Tax Office to Collect Personal and Transaction Data of 1.2 Million Cryptocurrency Traders

    The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is set to obtain personal and transaction details of up to 1.2 million cryptocurrency traders from exchanges. The move is part of the ATO's efforts to prevent tax evasion. The data collected will include names, addresses, birthdays and transaction details of traders to help the ATO audit compliance with obligations to pay capital gains tax on sales. The ATO aims to identify traders who have not reported their cryptocurrency-related activities, including the exchange of crypto assets when they sold it for currency or used it to pay for goods and services. The crackdown on the crypto industry in Australia has intensified since the collapse of FTX.

  • Bitcoin opens $63K futures gap as thin liquidity threatens BTC price

    Bitcoin market participants are doubting the staying power of the ongoing BTC price relief bounce.