Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

How to Stay Safe in DeFi: A Simple Guide to Evaluate Project Safety

The collapse of FTX proved the importance of self-custody and risk management.

But it’s so easy to lose money in DeFi if you are not careful with many exploits, rug pulls, contract bugs around.

In this blog I’d like to share how to evaluate safety of DeFi protocols to protect your assets.

It’s great if you’re an experienced smart contract developer and can verify the code yourself. But most of us aren’t.

It leaves us with no other choice, but to evaluate projects based on other data, that involves some degree of trust.

Total Value Lock, ultimate proof of security?

It’s no secret that the majority evaluate DeFi projects by how much value is deposited to the smart contracts. So, TVL is the ultimate proof of trust.

The higher the Total Value Locked, the higher the implied security of a protocol. If a lot of money is deposited, it means ‘someone’ did due diligence, and that protocol is secure.

Unfortunately, it gives a false sense of security. And high TVL protocols are actively targeted by hackers. At the same time, low TVL doesn’t mean a protocol is not secure.

Take a look at the top DeFi protocols by TVL.

  • Do you think that the TVL represents the level of security/safety?
  • Is there any protocol you wouldn’t trust with your money? Why?

There might be biases in you based on what you read online.

Trust, but verify?

‘Don’t trust, verify’ is the reason we have smart contract audits.

If that wasn’t the case, we might not need audits, because code is open source and community could find all the issues in the code. Yet the community might not have the right motivation, incentives or expertise to verify code.

Auditors are supposed to have the right technical expertise, but at the end of the day, we also have to trust them to do the right job.

Remember Twitter backlash against Certik because a few of their audited protocols ended up hacked?

Audit companies are building their reputation too. If the protocols they audit (and evaluated as safe) are exploited, then it shows lack of expertise. In fact, Certik has audited 3,422 projects, so no wonder some of them got hacked or had a bug.

Just having an audit doesn’t mean the protocol is safe. I’ve seen projects proudly announcing ‘Completed audit’, but when you read the audit the safety score is actually low.

The lesson is not to trust the announcements blindly, but verify the result by reading the actual audit.

What if you don’t read the audits?

The majority doesn’t read the audits anyway.

Knowing that Certik has a dashboard with all their audited projects. You can check the ‘Trust Score’ with higher number implying safety.

https://www.certik.com/

Other auditors like Hacken has a similar dashboard, or you could simply read the audit summary. Check the example, of Trader Joe’s audit done by Paladin.

You can see here that Trader Joe fixed high and medium severity issues, but not all low severity issues has been resolved.

https://paladinsec.co/projects/trader-joe-launchpeg/

Audit is just a start.

A lot more is needed to evaluate safety:

  • Adequate testing
  • Bounty campaigns
  • Documentation clarity
  • Admin controls
  • Oracle documentation

and much more… It’s a nightmare to verify it all yourself.

I really like what DefiSafety is doing. Its Process Quality Review verifies protocols and gives them a safety score.

https://www.defisafety.com/app?orderBy=finalScore

According to the PQR results, Liquity Protocol, Synthetix and Angle Protocol are the safest of all verified DeFi protocols.

On DefiSafety you can then check every element and see where the protocol scores the best/worst.

For example, Liquidy still needs Formal Verification.

Additionally, you can start by rating your portfolio safety on Exponential DeFi.

Its ‘Rate my wallet’ feature provides you with a custom risk analysis of your current investments. For example, $4.5M of Tetranode’s assets are deposited into riskier (C rank) protocols.

Elemental DeFi gives a score based on the project evaluation.Assessment takes into account asset risk, code quality and blockchain security to which the assets are deposited.

I like their easy to understand explanation of risks.

For example, take a look at Abracadabra’s MIM. It warns of SPELL being used as collateral which could result in bad debt.

If in doubt, ask!

Finally, I recommend joining the project community groups and ask:

Do they have an insurance fund?

Do they avoid questions?

What are they doing to increase security?

I asked Stargate team if they had an insurance fund in case they get hacked, but it sometimes more difficult to get an answer than I thought, which poses red flags.

But whatever happens, DeFi is still young, so better not to put all your assets into one protocol.

Do you have more useful tips how to evaluate projects and protect your assets?

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • The Bitcoin-native stablecoin bitSmiley Alphanet V1 Surpasses $24M TVL in 24 Hours!

    In a remarkable achievement, bitSmiley's Alphanet V1 skyrocketed to over $24 million in TVL within just 24 hours of its launch with over 6 million bitUSD stablecoins minted through over-collateralization. bitSmiley stands as a pioneering initiative, introducing stablecoins by over-collateralizing Bitcoin.

  • Securitize raises $47M in funding led by BlackRock to enhance innovation and expansion in digital asset securities ecosystem

    Miami-based company Securitize, which specializes in tokenizing real-world assets, has raised $47 million in funding. The round was led by BlackRock, with participation from Hamilton Lane, ParaFi Capital, Tradeweb Markets, Aptos Labs, Circle, and Paxos. The funds will be used to enhance the company's innovation and expansion as it consolidates its position in the digital asset securities ecosystem. BlackRock's first tokenized fund, the BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund, has also been launched on Ethereum and is available to investors by subscribing to the fund with Securitize.

  • Web3 game Shadow War completes $5 million financing, led by Momentum 6

    Game studio Patriots Division has raised $5 million in seed and Series A financing for its Web3 game Shadow War. The Series A funding was led by Momentum 6, with participation from iAngels, Cointelligence Fund, Xborg, Andromeda VC, Cogitent Ventures, and Cluster Capital.

  • BTC falls below $57,000

    According to market data, BTC has fallen below $57,000 and is currently trading at $56,999.99, with a daily decline of 5.48%. The market is volatile, so please be prepared for risk control.

  • CoreWeave, an AI cloud service provider, completes $1.1 billion Series C financing led by Coatue

    CoreWeave, a cloud service provider focusing on artificial intelligence, announced the completion of a $110 million Series C financing round. Coatue led this round of financing, with Magnetar (the main investor in the previous round), Altimeter Capital, Fidelity Management & Research Company, and Lykos Global Management participating.

  • Cointime MAY 1 News Express

    1.Celsius Network destroys 94% of total supply of CEL, worth over $89 million2.USDC Treasury destroyed more than 200 million USDC3.Pike was suspected of being hacked and lost 479 ETH4.Fantom launches $6.5 million development fund, betting on safer memecoins5.Yesterday, the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF had a net outflow of $162 million6.The balance of Binance Bitcoin wallet increased by 6249.36 in the past 24 hours, and 15565.89 inflows in the past 7 days7.In April, NFT sales on the Bitcoin chain exceeded US$685 million, setting the third highest monthly record in history8.On-chain content distribution agreement Metale Protocol completes additional $2 million in seed round financing9.A whale deposited 1,140 MKR into Coinbase, losing about $1.1 million10.The Bitcoin stablecoin project, bitSmiley, goes live with its Alphanet V1, marking its debut deployment on the Bitcoin Layer 2 network, Bitlayer.

  • Barcelona-based Web3 Video Games Startup GFAL Raises $3.2M in Seed Funding to Expand Team and Accelerate Production Plans

    Barcelona-based startup GFAL has secured $3.2 million in seed funding from investors including Supercell Ltd and Mitch Lasky. The company plans to use the funds to expand its team and accelerate its game production plans, which leverage AI and Web3 technology for immersive gameplay. GFAL's Elemental Raiders mobile game soft-launched in March 2023, with plans to build on this for a 2024 launch. CEO Manel Sort expressed gratitude for the investment and excitement to work with former colleagues from Digital Chocolate.

  • BTC falls below $58,000

    Golden Finance reported that according to OKX market data, BTC briefly touched $57,700 and is now trading at $58,581.53, with a daily decline of 7.15%. The market is volatile, so please be prepared for risk management.

  • On-chain content distribution agreement Metale Protocol completes additional $2 million in seed round financing

    Metale Protocol, a content distribution protocol on the blockchain, announced the completion of an additional $2 million seed round of financing. Waterdrip Capital led the investment, with participation from Aipollo Investment and Ultiverse. As of now, the total size of its seed round financing has reached $4 million. Metale Protocol was formerly known as Read2N, a Web3 decentralized reading application. The new funds will be allocated to its content creation fund to stimulate more content creation activities and promote the construction of its protocol as a platform for issuing and distributing content assets on the blockchain.

  • DWF Ventures announces investment in blockchain game developer Overworld

    DWF Ventures announced an investment in Overworld, a chain game developer. Overworld recently announced plans to launch another NFT series, and in addition, Overworld will soon launch the main world arena.