Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

e/acc: an emerging technological philosophy and social movement

Validated Project

Introduction

The idea of effective accelerationism has its roots in the theories of British philosopher Nick Land, who lectured at the University of Warwick and is known as the father of the broader accelerationist movement. More formal e/acc ideas have taken shape on Twitter and the Substack newsletter since 2022. Marc Andreessen, founder of A16Z, and Garry Tan, CEO of YC incubator, took the lead in adding "e/acc" to the suffix of their social account names. In the field of AI entrepreneurship and investment, "e/acc" seems to be like a A menacing new trend of thought.

what is e/acc

e/acc is the abbreviation of "Effective Accelerationism". It is a philosophical thought and social movement that advocates the use of technological innovation and the power of capitalism to promote social change and even subvert the existing social order.

The idea of e/acc comes from Accelerationism, which is a belief that the development of technology and capitalism is irreversible and uncontrollable, and human beings should adapt and use this development to achieve higher consciousness and life form of thought.

e/acc is a branch of accelerationism, which emphasizes the promotion and transformative effect of technological innovation on social change. It believes that human beings should promote and join technological innovation in various forms, and does not reject any innovative ideas that provide hypothetical value, even It seems too ridiculous, too far-fetched, or too far-fetched now. It believes that all imaginative technologies that claim to benefit human beings need to be supported and possible.

e/acc is particularly interested in artificial intelligence technology, which it believes is one of the most effective ways to promote the accelerated development of society. It advocates pursuing artificial general intelligence (AGI) as soon as possible and involving more people in technological development.

e/acc influences and changes all aspects of society through technological innovation, such as politics, economy, culture, technology, etc. It breaks the traditional thinking and framework, challenges the existing authority and rules, and shows a future vision full of infinite possibilities and opportunities.

How e/acc differs from traditional techno-utopianism

Technological Utopianism is an idea that technology can solve all human problems and bring about an idealized social state.

e/acc differs from traditional techno-utopianism in the following points:

· e/acc is not satisfied with realizing an idealized society under the existing social order, but hopes to change or even destroy the existing social order through technological innovation, thereby creating a brand new society;

· e/acc does not believe that technology can solve all human problems, but believes that technology can provide more resources, opportunities and choices, and can also deal with some urgent and major global problems;

· e/acc does not ignore or deny the risks and crises that technology may bring, but believes that these risks and crises are inevitable and beneficial because they can promote human evolution and adaptation;

· e/acc does not rely on or obey any authority or rules, but encourages individual creativity and autonomy, and believes that human beings should choose and use technology according to their own preferences and needs.

What impact does e/acc have on technology, system and culture

e/acc may have the following impacts on the three current fundamentals: technology, system, and culture:

· For technology, e/acc can promote the development and innovation of technology and provide more resources, opportunities and choices. e/acc encourages people to promote and join technological innovation in various forms, and it does not exclude any innovative ideas that provide hypothetical value, even if it seems too absurd, too outrageous or too far away now. It believes that all imaginative technologies that claim to benefit human beings need to be supported and possible. e/acc is particularly interested in artificial intelligence technology, which it believes is one of the most effective ways to promote the accelerated development of society. It advocates pursuing artificial general intelligence (AGI) as soon as possible and involving more people in technological development.

· For institutions, e/acc can affect and change various rules and arrangements in society, such as politics, economy, law, etc. e/acc breaks the traditional thinking and framework, challenges the existing authority and rules, and presents a future vision full of infinite possibilities and opportunities. e/acc may lead to the emergence of some new systems and the demise of old systems, such as decentralization, open source, user control, etc.

· For culture, e/acc can influence and change various values and beliefs in society, such as ethics, morality, fairness, justice, etc. e/acc may ignore or sacrifice some important values and principles, and may also create or promote some new values and principles. e/acc may lead to the emergence of some new cultural phenomena and social problems and the demise of old cultural phenomena and social problems, such as individuation, creativity, and experimentation.

What are the similarities and differences between e/acc and "effective altruism"

Effective Altruism is a philosophy and social movement that advocates "the use of evidence and reason to figure out how to benefit others as much as possible, and to act on that basis". People who pursue effective altruistic goals are called effective altruists, and they often choose careers or donate to charity based on the desired effect.

· e/acc has the following similarities and differences with effective altruism:

What e/acc has in common with effective altruism is:

· They are both ideas and movements based on reason and evidence, and they both try to find the best way to improve the world;

· They all focus on some important, neglected, solvable issues, such as global poverty, animal welfare, artificial intelligence safety, etc.;

· They all emphasize the equal consideration of all beneficiaries, regardless of geographical, racial, species and other factors;

· They both promote individual action and responsibility, encouraging people to make the best contribution according to their abilities and resources.

e/acc differs from effective altruism in that:

• Their attitudes toward technological innovation and capitalism differ. "e/acc" believes that technological innovation and capitalism are unstoppable, and that human beings should adapt and use this development to achieve higher consciousness and life forms; while "effective altruism" believes that technological innovation and capitalism are controllable and planned, and humans should oversee and guide this development to achieve a more equitable and sustainable society.

· They differ in their receptivity to innovative ideas. "e/acc" is more open and inclusive to the imagination and attempt of technological innovation, it does not reject any innovative ideas that provide hypothetical value, even if it seems too absurd, too outrageous or too far away; while "effective altruism" is more cautious and Rational evaluation and selection of technological innovations only support those innovative ideas with sufficient evidence and reasons, even if they seem too conservative, too mediocre or too boring.

• They differ in their goals and means of social change. "e/acc" is more subversive and radical. It is not satisfied with realizing an idealized society under the existing social order, but hopes to change or even destroy the existing social order through technological innovation, thereby creating A brand new society; while "effective altruism" is more progressive and progressive, it seeks to achieve some effective improvements and solutions in some key areas and problems on the basis of respecting and maintaining the existing social order.

The Influence and Controversy of "Effective Altruism" in the Field of Web3

Web3 refers to the combination of artificial intelligence and decentralized networks to achieve more efficient, safer, fairer, and more transparent digital services and applications.

In the field of Web3, effective altruism also has certain influence and controversy. On the one hand, effective altruism can provide some useful guidance and enlightenment for Web3, such as:

· Effective altruism can help Web3 identify and prioritize some important, neglected, solvable issues, such as data privacy, network security, digital citizenship, etc.;

Effective altruism can help Web3 evaluate and select some technological innovations supported by evidence and reasons, such as blockchain, smart contracts, zero-knowledge proofs, etc.;

Effective altruism can help Web3 balance and coordinate the interests and needs of all parties, such as developers, users, investors, regulators, etc.;

Effective altruism can help Web3 establish and maintain some important values and principles, such as ethics, morality, fairness, justice, etc.

On the other hand, effective altruism may also encounter some challenges and difficulties, such as:

· Effective altruism may be difficult to adapt to the rapid changes and uncertainties of Web3, it may not be able to obtain and analyze sufficient evidence and information in a timely manner, and it may not be able to predict and control the consequences and impact of technological innovation;

Effective altruism may be difficult to take into account the diversity and complexity of Web3, it may not be able to meet the preferences and needs of different groups and individuals, and it may not be able to resolve conflicts in different fields and issues and effective altruism may be difficult to take into account the diversity and complexity of Web3 , it may not be able to meet the preferences and needs of different groups and individuals, and it may not be able to resolve conflicts and contradictions in different fields and issues; it may require compromise and negotiation between different stakeholders, or between different values Make choices and trade-offs.

For example, effective altruism may require a balance and coordination of:

· In terms of data privacy and data sharing, effective altruism may require a trade-off between protecting users' personal information and promoting the public interest of society;

· In terms of cybersecurity and cyberopenness, effective altruism may require a choice between preventing cyberattacks and malicious behavior and encouraging online innovation and free expression;

· In terms of digital citizenship and digital responsibility, effective altruism may require negotiating between giving users more rights and autonomy and demanding more obligations and compliance from users.

Whether e/acc and effective altruism can be integrated from a case study

Volatility POPPLE is a tool that uses AI technology to help users manage emotions and a social product that conveys emotional value. It uses Web3 distributed technology to build a set of vector databases that collect user emotional data and aggregate them through TOKEN incentives to form emotional vertical fields. This trains a large model that specifically solves user emotion management, and at the same time implants social elements that assist users in in-depth interaction to provide emotional value, provides products and services based on the source of consciousness according to the actual needs of users, and establishes a guide for us. The value system of emotions and responses. This is an emotional management Dapp application based on human cognition and behavior patterns for ordinary people.

Volatility POPPLE can demonstrate whether e/acc and effective altruism can be integrated from the following aspects:

· In terms of technological innovation, POPPLE can reflect the collaboration and complementarity between e/acc and effective altruism. Wave POPPLE uses the most cutting-edge AI technology and Web3 technology, which is in line with e/acc's pursuit and support for technological innovation. At the same time, volatility POPPLE also uses technological innovation supported by evidence and reasons, which is in line with the evaluation and selection of technological innovation by effective altruism. Wave POPPLE's technological innovation has both potential and effect, both imagination and rationality.

· In terms of social change, the fluctuation POPPLE can reflect the balance and coordination between e/acc and effective altruism. Volatility POPPLE influences and changes users' emotional management and social communication through technological innovation, which is in line with e/acc's promotion and transformation of social change. At the same time, POPPLE also solves and improves users' emotional problems and social needs through technological innovation, which is in line with the improvement and solution of effective altruism for social change. The social changes that fluctuate POPPLE are both subversive and improved, both radical and gradual.

· In terms of values, POPPLE can reflect the integration and innovation between e/acc and effective altruism. Volatility POPPLE transmits and provides emotional value through technological innovation, which is in line with the creation and promotion of e/acc's values. At the same time, POPPLE also respects and protects emotional value through technological innovation, which is in line with the maintenance and respect of values by effective altruism. The values of POPPLE are both personalization and fairness, both creativity and morality.

In short, POPPLE is a typical AI+Web3 product. It can demonstrate from different aspects whether e/acc and effective altruism can be integrated into a unified ideology. The fluctuation POPPLE shows that e/acc and effective altruism can be partially integrated, but some adjustments and improvements are also needed. Integrating e/acc and effective altruism requires balance and coordination in terms of technological innovation, social change, and values.

At last

e/acc is a very creative and influential technical philosophy and social movement, it puts forward some challenging and forward-looking ideas and goals, it stimulates people's enthusiasm and exploration for technological innovation and social change, it Demonstrating a vision of the future filled with endless possibilities and opportunities.

e/acc is also a very risky and controversial technical philosophy and social movement. It involves some sensitive and complex issues and fields. It may trigger some crises and conflicts. It needs to be treated and evaluated carefully and rationally .

e/acc is a very valuable and inspiring technical philosophy and social movement, it can provide us with some useful guidance and enlightenment, it can help us better understand and respond to the current status and trends of technological innovation and social change , it can promote us to think more about and discuss problems and improvements in technology, system, culture and other aspects.

In short, we should hold an attitude of appreciation and prudence towards e/acc, appreciating its creativity and influence, but also prudently viewing its risks and controversies. e/acc is a phenomenon worthy of our attention and learning , but it also requires us to maintain clear and critical thinking.

FlerkenS is a decentralized personal AI application platform, based on the Web3 network that helps users achieve digital transformation, and provides users with borderless digital and intelligent services.

FlerkenS builds an AI market, an AI publisher, and an open and scalable general artificial intelligence (AGI) system. AI-DSL enables AI applications and services of different types and fields to collaborate and interact with each other, through personal vectors Database (Personal Vector Database) + Langchain Technology Solution (Langchain Technology Solution) + large-scale model technology implementation path, allowing users to obtain personalized AI services, and realize point-to-point with service providers under AI technology in a distributed network environment The connection to build a distributed AI intelligent business and a distributed AI economy.

The first application of FlerkenS: Smart career planning based on Web3+AI, which can provide personalized career development suggestions based on users' personal information, interests, abilities and goals, including career planning, training and career recommendations wait. It can also help users solve workplace problems and improve professional skills and confidence through dialogue and interaction.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Australian Tax Office to Collect Personal and Transaction Data of 1.2 Million Cryptocurrency Traders

    The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is set to obtain personal and transaction details of up to 1.2 million cryptocurrency traders from exchanges. The move is part of the ATO's efforts to prevent tax evasion. The data collected will include names, addresses, birthdays and transaction details of traders to help the ATO audit compliance with obligations to pay capital gains tax on sales. The ATO aims to identify traders who have not reported their cryptocurrency-related activities, including the exchange of crypto assets when they sold it for currency or used it to pay for goods and services. The crackdown on the crypto industry in Australia has intensified since the collapse of FTX.

  • Binance Research: Total cryptocurrency market value fell 11.3% in April, and total supply of US dollar stablecoins reached a two-year high

    Binance Research released its April cryptocurrency market report, with the following key points:

  • Vitalik: Plasma can prevent double withdrawal of any asset in a self-consistent way

    Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, stated on X platform that the purpose of Plasma is not to prevent invalid/unavailable state transitions, but rather to allow users with valuable assets to exit using the previous (valid and available) state when such a situation occurs, in a way that prevents double exits of any assets with consistent rules.

  • Hong Kong Bitcoin spot ETF saw its first net redemption, with a net redemption of 75.36 Bitcoins yesterday

    According to SoSo Value data, the Hong Kong Bitcoin spot ETF saw its first net redemption since trading began on April 30th. On May 6th, there was a net redemption of 75.36 Bitcoins, with a total holding of 4150 Bitcoins, a daily turnover of 8.6 million US dollars, and a total net asset value of 266 million US dollars.

  • The total net asset value of the US Bitcoin spot ETF is US$52.234 billion

    According to SoSoValue data, The total net inflow of US Bitcoin spot ETFs was $217 million on May 6 (US Eastern Time) yesterday. The net inflow of Grayscale ETF GBTC was $3.937 million yesterday, and GBTC's historical net outflow is currently $17.458 billion. The Bitcoin spot ETF with the highest net inflow yesterday was Fidelity ETF FBTC, with a net inflow of $99.1936 million in a single day, and FBTC's total historical net inflow has reached $8.13 billion. The second is Ark Invest and 21Shares' ETF ARKB, with a net inflow of $75.6412 million in a single day, and ARKB's total historical net inflow has reached $2.237 billion.

  • Crypto Super PAC Raises Over $100 Million for 2024 US Election

    According to PUBLIC CITIZEN, a cryptocurrency industry-backed super PAC has raised over $102 million, ranking third among all super PACs participating in the 2024 election. More than half of the political funds for the cryptocurrency super PAC (about $54 million) come from direct corporate spending, mainly from Coinbase and Ripple Labs.It is reported that four of the eight corporate cryptocurrency super PAC donors have settled or face charges from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for alleged violations of securities laws, with Ripple Labs alone facing a fine of nearly $2 billion.

  • The US government seized 3,940 BTC from drug dealers

    Blockchain data tracking company Arkham has stated that the US government has seized $250 million worth of BTC, currently being held by Arkham. The US government obtained 3,940 BTC from drug dealer Banmeet Singh and seized them during a trial in January 2024. According to court documents, Singh was responsible for selling controlled substances on the dark web market from 2012 to 2017 and distributing them throughout the United States. The statement from the Department of Justice (DOJ) and court documents match the on-chain flow of funds already added to our US government entity.

  • Jack Dorsey's Blockchain plans to raise $1.5 billion through senior notes issuance

    Jack Dorsey's financial technology company, Block (formerly known as Square), announced on May 6th that it plans to issue $1.5 billion in preferred notes to qualified institutional investors through private placement.

  • Yesterday, the US Bitcoin ETF had a net inflow of $218 million

    According to HODL15Capital data, yesterday (May 6th), the net inflow of US Bitcoin ETF was 218 million US dollars.

  • The US SEC has submitted sealed documents regarding the lawsuit against Ripple

    On May 7th, former US federal prosecutor James K. Filan disclosed the latest progress in the SEC's lawsuit against Ripple on X platform. The SEC has submitted sealed documents containing its response brief and supporting evidence for remedies. These documents have not been made public yet. The revised version that will be made public is expected to be submitted before Wednesday, May 8th. Other sealed documents will be submitted later.