Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

How Bitcoin Could Have Prevented Silicon Valley Bank from Collapsing?

Validated Project

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) was recently considered the go-to bank for venture capital and tech startups…

It has over $342 billion in client assets and was called the “startups bank.”

However, in just 36 hours, it all came crashing down…

Thousands of companies are now on the edge, and the damage to the economy is yet to be seen. Here’s everything you need to know about SVB’s downfall + how Bitcoin could have prevented this:

What happened to SVB?

Silicon Valley Bank, is a bank that specializes in serving the technology and venture capital industries (in particular US-based start-ups).

They made concentrated bets and invested heavily in safe assets like US Treasuries. This strategy worked well in a low-interest rate regime…

However, when the Fed started hiking rates last year, SVB made a risky bet that the Fed’s pace would be slower. They invested $100 billion into government-backed bonds and locked it away for 3–4 years at an interest rate of 1.79%

But, the FED started hiking rates fast, which made SBV’s bonds be worth significantly less than initally purchased…

Remember: Silicon Valley Bank used its client’s money to make these risky bets!

Ultimately SVB had to sell at a loss for liquidity. This loss became significant when SVB’s clients, mostly startups, started withdrawing more money to pay for expenses…

SVB needed money to fund withdrawals but had to take a loss on bonds to do this. On March 8, the company announced they would sell a third of ownership to raise $2.25 billion. But the next day, the stock dropped by 60% when word got out that the bank was facing insolvency issues. The CEO called clients to assure them their money was safe… hmmm

The problem with FDIC insurance

FDIC insurance is a type of deposit insurance offered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to protect depositors in case their bank fails or becomes insolvent.

Although the FDIC insurance covers accounts up to $250k, 97.3% of accounts at SVB were larger than that, as they were business accounts

Though the companies might get some of their money back when assets are sold, it might take years.

That’s an emergency because that money is needed for payroll, expenses, and just keeping companies running. Companies that saved up cash to prepare for a recession could now just die because they couldn’t access their money!

How could Bitcoin have prevented this?

Bitcoin operates differently from banks.

It’s decentralized, meaning it doesn’t rely on a central authority to operate. Instead, it uses a public ledger, known as the blockchain, to keep track of transactions. This makes it more transparent and secure than traditional banking systems.

Bitcoin doesn’t operate on a fractional reserve system, meaning there’s no risk of banks taking bets on what the Fed will do…

Additionally, Bitcoin is a finite currency, meaning there’s a limit to the number of Bitcoins that can be created. This makes it less susceptible to inflation and devaluation (unlike all fiat currencies which are becoming worthless due to skyhigh inflation)

Moreover, with Bitcoin, there’s no need to worry about FDIC insurance because it’s not a centralized authority. Instead, your funds are stored in a digital wallet, which only you have access to. This gives you complete control over your funds and eliminates the risk of banks failing or insolvency issues.

SVB’s failure is a significant blow to the tech world, and thousands of companies are now on the edge.

The problem with fractional reserve banking systems and FDIC insurance has been exposed, and it’s time to rethink our banking systems.

Bitcoin, with its decentralized nature and finite currency, could be the solution we need to prevent another SVB-like disaster!

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • SlowMist: Beware of watering hole attacks launched by malicious attackers using WordPress plugin vulnerabilities

    SlowMist Security has issued a warning that attackers have recently been exploiting vulnerabilities in WordPress plugins to inject malicious JS code into normal websites and launch watering hole attacks. These attacks involve popping up malicious windows when users visit the site, deceiving them into executing malicious code or performing Web3 wallet signatures, thereby stealing their assets. It is recommended that sites using WordPress plugins check for vulnerabilities, update plugins in a timely manner, and avoid being attacked. When visiting any website, users should carefully identify the downloaded programs and Web3 signature content to avoid downloading malicious programs or having their assets stolen due to malicious signatures.

  • Unverified Ember Sword NFT auction contract vulnerability has caused nearly $200,000 in losses

    Certik has discovered a vulnerability in the unverified Ember Sword NFT auction contract, which has earned 60 WETH (approximately $195,000) from 159 victims who approved the contract. Certik reminds users to revoke their approval of the relevant contract on Polygon.

  • zkSync ecological lending platform xBank Finance suspected of RUG

    xBank Finance, a zkSync ecosystem lending platform, was suspected of being a RUG, and the protocol's TVL was close to zero. The project's official Twitter account has been frozen.

  • Scammers use fake USDT balances to defraud cryptocurrency users

    SlowMist has partnered with Imtoken to uncover a new cryptocurrency scam that uses offline transactions and USDT. Scammers manipulate the Ethereum RPC to falsify the USDT balance in the victim's wallet. The scammer lures the victim to change their Ethereum RPC URL to a URL controlled by them, making it appear that the victim has deposited USDT funds, but in reality, the victim is left empty-handed when attempting to trade. In addition, the scam also deceives users through small transfers to gain trust, then manipulates account balances and contract information, posing serious risks to unsuspecting users and is related to a wider range of pig slaughter scam activities.

  • Cointime April 27th News Express

    1. ETH falls below $3,100

  • HKEX: Accepts BOS HashKey, Huaxia, Harvest Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs as eligible securities for multiple counters in the central clearing system

    On April 27th, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange issued three notices, announcing the inclusion of Bo Shi HashKey Bitcoin ETF shares and Bo Shi HashKey Ethereum ETF shares, Huaxia Bitcoin ETF shares and Huaxia Ethereum ETF shares, and Jia Shi Bitcoin Spot ETF shares and Jia Shi Ethereum Spot ETF shares as Central Clearing System multi-counterparty eligible securities. It is reported that:

  • Russia’s Central Bank and Rosfinmonitoring unveil pilot of fiat-to-crypto tracking system

    According to reports, since 2023, Russia has been trying to track cryptocurrency transactions and their sources. The Russian Central Bank and the Federal Financial Monitoring Service (Rosfinmonitoring) revealed that there is currently a system that allows private banks to track the connection between fiat-based transactions and cryptocurrency business.

  • PolkaWorld: Coretime trading on Kusama has started

    On April 27th, PolkaWorld announced that Coretime trading on Kusama has begun, marking the end of the era of parallel chains. With the approval and implementation of Kusama proposal 373, the proposal will upgrade the Kusama relay chain runtime to v1.2.0 and bring Coretime functionality. Shortly thereafter, the Kusama community approved Kusmaa proposal 375 last Friday, allowing Coretime chain to begin selling Coretime. Currently, Kusama is in the Renew Period and is selling batches of Coretime.

  • Over $155 million worth of MEME will be unlocked on May 3, accounting for 31.96% of the circulating supply

    According to Token Unlocks data, 5.31 billion MEME tokens, worth over $155 million, will be unlocked on May 3, 2024, accounting for 31.96% of the circulating supply. These tokens will be unlocked and distributed to airdrops, advisors, and investors.

  • The total open interest of BTC options is $17.83 billion, and the open interest of ETH options is $8.07 billion.

    Coinglass data shows that the nominal value of unclosed BTC option positions on the entire network is 17.83 billion US dollars, which is the lowest point since February 26; the nominal value of unclosed ETH option positions is 8.07 billion US dollars, which is the lowest point since February 25.