Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Why USDT Issuances Ensures No Risks From FTX_Alameda

Cointime Official

The failure of FTX/Alameda is likely to be a watershed moment in the history of the cryptocurrency industry. In addition to being one of the largest financial failures, it has set off a daisy chain of leveraged failures cascading through the industry.

While there is still more to the story, and likely more counterparties who will emerge in the coming weeks, Tether wants to address one topic which has come to the surface following the failure of FTX.

It is well-known that Alameda was one of the larger issuers of USD₮, and due to this there has been ample discussion of whether the failure of Alameda represents a risk to Tether.

The short answer is: No

The long answer is as follows-

Tether Issuance

What does it mean to be a large issuer of USD₮? If someone issues a large amount of USD₮ and goes bankrupt does that expose Tether's collateral?

USD₮ is issued when institutional parties send USD to Tether and Tether issues USD₮ on a 1:1 basis corresponding to the amount of USD sent to Tether. Tether then converts this USD into reliable, liquidity and conservative collateral ( US Treasuries, etc).

All USD₮ is fully collateralized by Tether's reserves and every USD₮ can be redeemed 1:1 with USD.

What does it mean that Alameda issued USD₮? It means they sent Tether USD, and Tether issues USD₮. Those reserves are still in Tether's possession; they are not on Alameda's balance sheet. The collateral backing Alameda's USD₮ is not on Alameda's balance sheet.

What can Alameda do with their USD₮? Their only option is to redeem any USD₮ they have for USD via Tether's redemption facility. This is the same as any other USD₮ holder around the world.

Lending, Leverage and Liabilities

Did Tether lend Alameda any USD₮ or other funds? No, Tether has no outstanding loans of USD₮, of Tether's reserves, or of any other funds whatsoever.

The main problem countless other companies are facing is that they recklessly lent Alameda various assets relying on extremely illiquid collateral. Since Alameda cannot repay those loans at this time, those companies have a hole on their balance sheet. This is not how USD₮ issuance works, and is not behavior Tether engaged in with Alameda in any way.

Is lending part of the USD₮ issuance cycle ever?The only time Tether engages in lending is, as the example of Celsius shows, when Tether has lent USD₮ to select customers based on over-collateralization with extremely liquid assets. We believe the approach of many lenders in this industry has been reckless, lending huge quantities of money, and accepting FTT (and other illiquid assets) and pinky swears as collateral.

This is further validated by how despite the sudden unwinding of Celsius, Tether’s operations were not disrupted. In fact, even during the highly volatile conditions of Terra’s collapse, Tether was able to liquidate Celsius’s collateral with such precision that Tether was even able to return some of the collateral.

What about leverage? Leverage played a key role in the dramatic unwinding of FTX. Does Tether engage in any leverage activity, leverage trading or collateralized borrowing against Tether's reserves?

No.

Tether does not take highly leveraged directional bets on digital assets as part of its operations.

Solana Suspensions

Binance recently temporarily suspended USDC and USD₮ deposits on the Solana Blockchain. OKX did as well. Why is this? Is there a risk inherent to Solana USD₮?

No

USD₮ issued on Solana is the same as USD₮ issued on any other chain. The token simply represents a claim to $1 of Tether's reserves and collateral. Alameda's heavy involvement in Solana doesn't impact the underlying dynamics of how USD₮ functions and USD₮ issuance works whatsoever.

The move to suspend USD₮ deposits on these exchanges is likely just due to the heavy connections between FTX, Alameda, and Solana. If holders of USD₮ want to redeem USD₮ with Tether, they still can. USD₮ on Solana is equivalent to USD₮ on any other Blockchain, it is not issued by Solana and is not reserved by Alameda or FTX.

8 Years of Stability

Tether has been designed to withstand staggering volatility in cryptocurrency markets. While the FTX situation has been unique in many ways, it does not represent a threat of a risk to Tether or USD₮.

Tether continues to function normally and process redemptions whenever they are requested. Tether has no exposure to FTX or Alameda (and zero exposure to Genesis as well).

We look forward to continuing to provide investors with a reliable tokenized dollar as they navigate these challenging times.(BY Tether)

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Hong Kong Shatin District Councillor Deng Zhaofeng: ETF allows individual investors to participate in the virtual currency market with small investments

    Hong Kong Sha Tin District Councilor Deng Zhaofeng published an article entitled "Grasping Financial Innovation Opportunities and Not Forgetting to Exclude Risks" in the A14 edition of Hong Kong Wen Wei Po, pointing out that the launch of Hong Kong's virtual currency ETF brings three opportunities to the market:

  • Ethereum on-chain DEX transaction volume yesterday was $1.796 billion

    According to DeFiLlama data, the trading volume of DEX on the Ethereum blockchain was 1.796 billion US dollars on April 22, ranking first. In addition, the trading volume of DEX on the Solana blockchain was 1.534 billion US dollars yesterday, ranking second; the trading volume of DEX on the BSC blockchain was 772.09 million US dollars yesterday, ranking third.

  • HKEX: The uniform margin rate for non-constituent virtual asset spot ETFs will be set at 30%

    The Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) and Hong Kong Securities Clearing Company Limited issued a notice on the "Margin Rates for Trading Virtual Asset Spot Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs)". It was pointed out that the following risk management arrangements, which refer to the announcement issued on April 17, 2024 (No. ETP/001/24), will take effect on the same day as the launch of the virtual asset spot ETF:

  • Tether issued USDT worth $508 million yesterday and redeemed USDT worth $165 million

    According to ChainArgos monitoring, Tether conducted a large-scale issuance and redemption activity on April 22. A total of 508 million USDT was issued that day, while 165 million USDT was redeemed.

  • Fidelity: Bitcoin's medium-term outlook revised from "positive" to "neutral" due to possible increase in selling pressure

    On April 23rd, Fidelity revised their mid-term outlook on Bitcoin from "positive" to "neutral" after some indicators showed that Bitcoin is no longer considered "cheap" in the face of potential selling pressure.

  • YieldNest, a liquidity re-staking protocol powered by EigenLayer, has raised $5.2 million

    On April 23, YieldNest, a liquidity re-collateralization protocol supported by EigenLayer, completed a $5.2 million financing round with participation from Faculty Group, BACKED, Loi Luu, Winthorpe, C2tP, Curve founder Michael Egorov, and others.

  • BlackRock's spot Bitcoin ETF has achieved net inflows for 70 consecutive days

    The BlackRock Bitcoin ETF has seen net inflows for 70 consecutive days. This places the ETF among the top daily inflows for any ETF. Earlier on Monday, Eric Balchunas, a senior ETF analyst at Bloomberg, stated that if BlackRock's fund continues to see net inflows for 70 consecutive days, it will become one of the most successful ETFs in history.

  • NYSE Considers 24-Hour Trading Model to Counter Crypto Market Trends

    The Financial Times reported that the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) has had its data analysis team conduct a survey of its members to evaluate their interest in switching to 24/7 trading. The Financial Times stated that this idea has gained increasing attention in recent years, partly due to the increased activity of retail investors caused by the round-the-clock operation of cryptocurrency trading.

  • Bitcoin ETF demand turns negative after BTC halving

    he 11 spot bitcoin ETFs approved by US regulators in January managed to attract a total of more than $13 billion in fund inflows in the months following their launch, a feat that took gold ETFs several years to achieve. However, demand for the product appears to be slowing down after several weeks of net inflows into the bitcoin ETF. By the third week of April, ETF demand had slowed to consecutive days of net outflows. Following the halving of BTC block rewards, ETF inflows have turned negative.

  • Ontario Court of Justice in Canada Sues Binance for Violating Securities Laws

    According to a report by Financefeeds, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Canada has filed a class action lawsuit against the Binance cryptocurrency trading platform, accusing it of selling cryptocurrency derivatives to retail investors without registration, in violation of securities laws. The lawsuit seeks damages and the rescission of these trades. It also claims that Binance's business failed to register and file a prospectus in accordance with securities regulations. The court stated in its ruling that the plaintiffs claimed that these sales were illegal and invalid due to a lack of necessary registration.