Cointime

Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

What Is the Best Ethereum Scaling Solution? Part 4: Validium & Volition

What is validium?

Validium is a method of scaling Ethereum that secures the validity of transactions through validity proofs like ZK rollups but does not store or send the transaction data to the Ethereum mainnet. This trade-off of not sending the transaction data to Ethereum allows for massive improvements in scalability where validiums can process about 9,000 transactions per second or more while ZK rollups can process up to about 2,000 transactions per second. Also by not storing transaction data on-chain, transaction information is processed off-chain making them private.

Validium only keeps the validity proofs on-chain and keeps transaction data off-chain.

Due to the technical design of validium, the funds that belong to validium users are controlled by a smart contract on the Ethereum mainnet. Users can withdraw funds by providing Merkle proofs that prove that some of the funds in the smart contract belong to the user. Once the submission is validated, the Merkle proof includes the withdrawal transaction in the validity proofs, thereby processing the withdrawal. Since transaction data is needed to compute Merkle proof, this process also means that user funds can be frozen and restricted from withdrawals if off-chain transaction data is not shared with users.

source: buildblockchain.tech

What is volition?

Since validium, has a lack of on-chain data availability due to not storing and sending transaction data, it is suited for specific use cases like DEXes in DeFi where the number of transactions per second and private infrastructure is important. To reap the benefits of validium with the data availability of rollups, volitions were created by combining a ZK rollup and a validium chain.

Volition allows users to switch between the on-chain data availability of ZK rollups for certain transactions and the off-chain data availability of validium when needed. Users have the freedom to decide how their transactions will be processed according to their circumstances.

What are the shortfallings of validium?

Even though validium allows for magnitudes of transactions compared to different scaling solutions, there are clear weak points.

  1. Limited support for general-purpose applications/smart contracts
  2. Specialized computing language needed for development
  3. The high computational power is required to create ZK proofs that may lead to centralization
  4. Expensive for low throughput applications
  5. Users may have funds frozen or restricted if they do not have access to off-chain data

Validiums/Volitions

Starkware StarkEx

StarkEx is a volition created by Starkware and is built with the Cairo program and SHARP. Depending on specific use cases, users may choose to operate in either ZK Rollup or validium data-availability modes. When used in the validium data-availability mode, all transactions are private and protected by post-quantum secure cryptography. Today, the total value locked in StarkEx is about $508M.

source: Starkware

Matterlabs zkPorter

zkPorter is a volition created by Matterlabs that combines ZK rollups and validium through sharding (read more about sharding HERE). It can support many shards, where the user can choose between off-chain or on-chain data availability, with contracts and accounts being seamlessly interchangeable on either the zkRollup or validium side.

source: Matterlabs

In conclusion:

Validium/Volition is the next step in the innovation of scaling layer 1 chains like Ethereum. Since the overwhelming majority of rollup fees consists of the cost of publishing data onto the Ethereum mainnet, having the transactions kept off-chain allows for cheaper fees and increases throughput. However, this solution comes with a massive trade-off since the off-chain data is not inherently public, users of validium services have an issue of counterparty risk. That is why, due to the design of transaction data not being sent to Ethereum, for security purposes, validium is currently used alongside scaling solutions like zkRollups to make sure users can reap the benefits from both technologies.

We have now explored four mainnet scaling solution: Optimistic rollup, ZK rollup, sidechains, and validium. I hope you had as much fun as me learning about them, their differences, their similarities, and the trade-offs that come with each solution.

Personally, the more I learned about each scaling solution, the more it was difficult for me to pinpoint which is the “best” one. Each scaling solution has distinctive strengths and weaknesses that it is up to the developers to decide which solution is best for the application they are building. However, one thing I can say is that I am more confident about the future of blockchain technology. Its future is in good hands, with driven and intelligent people working to solve the problems blockchain have today and will be continuing to do so in the future.

So what do you think is the best scaling solution for Ethereum?

Ethereum
Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Scammers use Google to promote fake Whales Market website to steal cryptocurrency

    According to a report from BleepingComputer, threat actors have discovered a method where scammers use Google's platform to promote phishing websites impersonating Whales Market in order to steal cryptocurrency. These fraudulent websites are placed as sponsored links (i.e. advertisements) at the top of Google search result pages, and despite the domain address displayed on the search result page appearing to be real, users will be redirected to the fake website upon clicking.

  • Cyvers: Hedgey suffered the same vulnerability on Arbitrum and lost about $42.8 million

    Cyvers Alerts on X platform stated that the system detected that the financial derivative agreement Hedgey Finance executed the same vulnerability on the ARB chain and gained approximately 42.8 million US dollars in profit.

  • Tether issues 1 billion USDT on Ethereum (authorized but not yet issued)

    Whale Alert has monitored Tether Treasury's addition of 1 billion USDT on Ethereum. Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino stated that this 1 billion USDT is a supplement to Ethereum inventory. This is an authorized but unissued transaction, which means that this issuance will be used for the next issuance request and cross-chain exchange inventory.

  • CertiK: Hedgey vulnerability was exploited and $1.9 million was stolen

    CertiK Alert posted on social media that it has detected that the on-chain token infrastructure protocol Hedgey has been exploited and stolen approximately 1.9 million US dollars.The attacker abused the createLockedCampaign function in flash loans to obtain approval for the use of tokens on the victim's contract. The USDC, NOBL, and MASA tokens in the victim's contract have been depleted.

  • Binance executives' bail application postponed again, still in custody

    The bail hearing for Binance executive Tigran Gambaryan has been postponed again by a Nigerian court, and he remains detained at the Kuje Correctional Center. The hearing is now scheduled for April 22, with the EFCC requesting time to respond to new arguments from the defense. Gambaryan's lawyer criticized the prosecution for failing to respond promptly. Binance has been accused of concealing the source of its income, while Gambaryan is accused of money laundering. In addition, he has also filed a lawsuit against the government for violating his human rights.

  • BTC breaks through $64,000

    The market shows BTC breaking through $64,000, now reporting at $64,012.44, with an intraday increase of 4.95%. The market fluctuates greatly, so please be prepared for risk control.

  • SEC accuses Justin Sun of frequent trips to the U.S. to sell tokens

    The US SEC has amended its lawsuit against Tron founder Sun Yuchen, stating that his frequent travel to multiple locations in the US allows the court to have corresponding jurisdiction. The SEC accuses Sun Yuchen and his company of selling unregistered securities through Tron and BitTorrent (BTT) tokens and engaging in manipulative money laundering transactions. The SEC claims that Sun Yuchen spent more than 380 days in the US from 2017 to 2019, with travel destinations including New York, Boston, and San Francisco. Sun Yuchen argues that the token sales were conducted entirely overseas, avoiding the US market, and therefore the SEC has no jurisdiction over him and the Tron Foundation, which is headquartered in Singapore. (Cointelegraph)

  • Cyvers Alerts: Multiple phishing transactions detected this morning

    Cyvers Alerts reported on X platform that multiple phishing transactions were discovered by the system this morning. The victims have approved the external owned accounts (EOA) of the phishers. We strongly recommend revoking the relevant approvals.

  • BTC breaks through $63,000

    The market shows BTC has broken through $63,000 and is currently trading at $63,062.48, with an intraday increase of 3.53%. The market is volatile, so please be prepared for risk control.

  • CZ: Bitcoin halving is different from stock split, happy halving

    CZ wrote on X platform that Bitcoin halving is different from stock splitting. The fact that people are asking such questions shows that we are still in the early stages. He then attached a picture to explain his views on what might happen before and after the Bitcoin halving in 2023, and said "happy halving!"

Daily Must-Read

Popular Activities

Delysium $AGI & AI Private Yacht Party

Delysium $AGI & AI Private Yacht Party

March 27 - March 27
Seoul

Popular Tags

Cointime
News
Contents
RSS
Company