Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

What Is NFTFi? Everything You Need To Know

Validated Project

Before the NFT Summer of 2021 — a time where the global market for NFTs ballooned to over USD$2.5B — the cryptosphere bore witness to a similarly exuberant period, which has since come to be known as the DeFi Summer of 2020.

In large part fueled by the phenomenon of yield-farming, the events of DeFi Summer drove the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi protocols to roughly USD$10B by late-September. With the recent explosions that both the NFT and DeFi markets have undergone, it was only a matter of time before the two technologies would inevitably cross paths.

What is NFTFi exactly?

NFTFi is using NFTs to finance transactions through accessing more liquid assets.NFTFi is using NFTs to finance transactions through accessing more liquid assets.

This collision of DeFi and NFTs has opened up a variety of possibilities for NFT holders by making their NFTs a much more liquid asset.

There are a variety of sectors within NFTFi, and this article will go through what they are, their respective pros and cons, and the largest platforms in these sectors.

The sectors within NFTFi include:

  • NFT fractionalization
  • NFT renting
  • NFT derivatives
  • Lending\Borrowing using NFTs

Where NFTs and DeFi collide

Currently DeFi protocols are designed around mimicking traditional finance. However, with the introduction of NFTs, there’s potential for a whole new range of financial products. For example, some lending protocols now allow for NFTs to be pledged as loan collateral, granting both borrowers and lenders an alternative to the more traditional stablecoin or cryptocurrency-backed loans in DeFi. In either case, NFT/-DeFi projects exploit the strengths of each technology to offer a product that is patently more valuable than the sum of its parts.

In practice, the marriage between DeFi and NFTs is an area that has been accumulating increasingly more interest and development activity. Overall, it would appear that some projects are generally more geared towards augmenting NFTs to suit DeFi methods. For instance, the existence of liquidity pools and fractionalization protocols allow NFT holders to realize liquidity on their holdings while granting investors who are not as well-capitalized the opportunity to gain exposure to high-value tokens. In contrast, other projects seem to place greater emphasis on enhancing DeFi primitives through the use of NFT-based assets. As an example, some lending protocols now allow for NFTs to be pledged as loan collateral, granting both borrowers and lenders an alternative to the more traditional stablecoin or cryptocurrency-backed loans in DeFi. In either case, NFT/DeFi projects exploit the strengths of each technology to offer a product that is patently more valuable than the sum of its parts. Let’s look at some examples.

What is NFT Fractionalization?

NFT fractionalization is the process of sharing ownership of an NFT through a set of fungible tokens tied to the original NFT.

To fractionalize an NFT, the NFT is placed in a vault. ERC-20 tokens representing ownership of the NFT are then minted, each of which represents a share of ownership in the original NFT.

Pros

NFT fractionalization allows investors that are less well-capitalized to gain exposure to expensive NFT collections. This enables more liquidity to enter the market, since an expensive NFT can be divided into shares of its worth using fungible tokens.

Cons

A difficulty that arises from NFT fractionalization is the process of “putting it back together.” For the whole NFT to be removed from the vault, all of the holders must sell their shares, meaning all of the fractions have to be put back together.

Platforms

  • Unic.ly allows users to fractionalize NFT by connecting their wallets, depositing their NFTs into a vault, and minting new ERC-20 tokens (uToken). Unic.ly has its own DEX, UnicsSwap, a fork of UniSwap, where uTokens can be traded. Unic.ly provides mechanisms to help ensure that uToken pools have sufficient liquidity. uTokens can also be whitelisted if a collection is of high enough value. LP token holders of whitelisted collections can stake their LP tokens to earn $UNIC, the governance token of Unic.ly.
  • Fractional.art offers similar services. The key difference between the two platforms is that Fractional.art does not have an option for investors to stake to earn yields.
  • NFTX.io is a NFT marketplace platform that lets users deposit their NFTs into a vault to create a fungible ERC20 token (vToken). The newly minted token represents a 1:1 claim on any random NFT within the vault. Users can pool the ERC20 tokens in Automated Market Makers (AMMs) like SushiSwap to create liquidity and trade.

What is NFT Renting?

Blue-chip NFT projects such as the BAYC or the Cryptopunks are not affordable for the majority of people. At the time of writing, the collections have floor prices of 84 ETH ($142,200) and 74 ETH ($125,300) respectively. Like fractionalization, NFT Renting has been established as a solution to this problem, just in a different, more familiar form.

Like renting a flat or a car, renting NFTs provides an individual with access to an NFT for a limited time.

NFT renting comes in two forms:

1. collateralized renting

2. collateral-less renting.

Collateralized Renting

For collateralized renting, an NFT owner lists their asset on a rental marketplace. The renter can then initiate the renting process.

The NFT is placed in a smart contract with the terms and conditions of the borrower and the lender. These conditions include the rental fee and collateral, which has a higher price than the NFT to protect the lender. After the contract expires, the NFT and the collateral will return to their original owners.

The process of overcollateralized renting isn’t dissimilar to the method adopted by borrowing and lending protocols in DeFi. A prospective renter can gain access to the NFT they’d like to borrow by posting collateral valued at a higher price than the NFT they’d like. Borrowers can then access the NFT for a period of time specified by the NFT holder and encoded smart contract to which the NFT is tied.

Collateral-Less Renting

The key difference between the two is that the renter, in collateral-less renting, will never receive the original NFT.

Platforms that offer Collateral-less renting allow lenders to deposit their NFT and make a wrapped version of it. Once a user rents the NFT and pays the rental fee the renter will receive the wrapped NFT enjoying the same utility as the original one. After the contract expires, the wrapped NFT is burned and the rental fee will be sent to the lender. Collateral-less renting minimizes risk for both parties since the renter doesn’t need to put up collateral, and the lender doesn’t need to rent out their original asset.

Pros

Renting affords NFT holders the opportunity to earn passive income from their NFT collections on their own terms, without having to concern themselves with fractionalization.

The use cases for renting are continuously expanding. As the space develops, renting NFTs will increasingly have use cases in NFT galleries and museums, with platforms like Musee Dezentral already offering this experience. Holders of NFTs that provide access rights can rent out their NFTs to those that wish to attend NFT-gated events of communities for a period of time, if they’re not using them for that purpose themselves, but wish to retain exposure to the NFT.

Cons

NFT renting is still new as a business model in the world of NFTs, and therefore is still prone to exploits. One exploit that recently happened was during the Ape Coin airdrop for BAYC holders. An unknown user took a flash loan and rented out 5 BAYC NFTs before the airdrop to make his/her wallet eligible for the Ape Coin airdrop. They were airdropped Ape Coin, and the unknown user managed to make $800,000 because of a NFT renting exploit.

Platforms

  • Most NFT rental platforms provide a relatively similar service. They offer a menu to browse different NFTs and collections, and all it takes to either mint a wrapped NFT or post collateral is to connect a user’s wallet. The largest collateralized NFT renting platforms are IQ Protocol and Vera.
  • The largest collateral-free renting platform is reNFT.
  • The platform IQ Protocol is not yet fully operational for renting, nor is reNFT so the number of collections which will be available and the experience of renting is still difficult to judge. Vera is operational, but currently only has 25 NFTs listed for rent.

What are NFT Derivatives?

NFT derivatives are one of the newer developments in the NFTFi world. Derivatives within the realms of NFTs, are similar to non-NFT derivatives;

they represent tradable contracts which let people bet on the future prices of NFT collections.

Pros

NFT derivatives help a lot in terms of NFT liquidity. It opens a lot of possibilities, such as access to trading high value NFTs, and even access to using leverage to trade NFTs. Users can also trade in either direction of the price of the NFT either up (long) or down (short).

The derivatives market in TradFi is significantly bigger than spot markets, with the notional value of derivatives estimated to be worth hundreds of trillions of dollars. This shows the market growth potential of NFT derivatives, especially when using the 11 billion dollar market for NFTs as the equivalent to the spot market.

Cons

Just like other derivatives trading, NFT derivatives are highly risky, especially when using leverage, as it can magnify losses. Moreover, NFT derivatives trading is in its nascency, therefore few NFT collections are currently available for derivatives trading.

Platforms

  • The most well-known platform that offers NFT derivatives trading is NFTures which is a product by Synfutures. Currently, the platform is only available for early access, with only one NFT available to long/short, a CryptoPunk with a current price of 77 ETH.
  • Fuku is another firm pioneering the NFT derivatives space. Fuku will offer the first options trading NFT marketplace, where anyone can buy and write options on any NFT, rather than limiting trading to certain collections. This means that there are over 2 million collections, and 80 million NFTs that Fuku allows consumers to write and buy options on, expanding NFTFi trading beyond just blue-chip NFTs. Fuku also offers a variety of trading services beyond just call and put options, such as limit orders, and the ability to bid on multiple NFT derivatives with the same collateral. Tokenized options can also be resold on secondary markets, expanding Fuku influence. On Fuku, writing options is completely gasless due to it occurring off-chain. Gas is only paid when a buyer and seller agree on a trade, which is then tokenized as an ERC721 non-fungible-token. These factors truly differentiate Fuku, and have led to confidence in their platform from some of the largest players in the web3 market. Their partners include blockchain capital, Coinbase, a16z, and Y Combinator.

Lending/Borrowing using NFTs

There are three emerging types of lending in the NFTFi world:

1. P2P NFT Lending

NFT lending is a growing sector within the NFT industry. Like DeFi lending, NFT lending is usually facilitated on-chain via a smart contract. The smart contract contains the assets, the liquidity (loan), and the terms and conditions of the loan. P2P NFT lending platforms connect prospective borrowers with lenders on a peer-to-peer basis, setting up a trustless loan between the two parties, using NFTs as collateral.

2. Lending/CDPs

A collateral debt position for NFTs is created by locking collateral in a smart contract to generate a stablecoin. The collateral in this case would be an NFT, and the CDP is created by finding a floor price for the NFT collection, which is used to determine the size of the loan.

3. Lending Pools

Lending pools in NFT money markets operate much like they do in DeFi, where they’ve become popularized by platforms like Aave and Compound. Lending pools use an over-collateralization approach. Borrowers post NFTs as collateral. This enables them to borrow funds for a fee for lending, with a market value which is less than the total value of the collateral. This fee is distributed to lenders to incentivise them to provide liquidity.

Pros

NFT lending provides additional liquidity support to the whole NFT ecosystem. This new industry allows NFT lenders to leverage their collections to earn yield, which is paid by the borrower, in the form of a borrowing fee. Borrowers also have the potential to finance new NFT purchases through loans, as they can access more liquid capital without having to sell their NFT.

Cons

A con of all of these lending options is the difficulty of pricing an NFT. As seen below, platforms have different mechanisms, such as simply using the price floor, or using their own pricing oracle. Using a price floor can severely undervalue the NFT though, as the price floor is that of the least valuable NFT in a collection. The oracle pricing mechanisms are also problematic, as they are shrouded with uncertainty over their methods or their accuracy.

To mitigate this issue, currently, most platforms only allow certain NFT collections to be used as collateral, guaranteeing some form of stability in the price of collateral for those who provide loans.

Platforms

  • One of the most known NFT lending platforms is NFTfi.com. It allows NFT owners to use NFTs to access the liquidity they need by receiving secured wETH and DAI loans. NFTfi.com is a peer-to-peer platform that lets NFT holders and liquidity providers connect via permissionless smart contract infrastructure. NFTfi.com offers their services for over 150 NFT collections, making their services available for a variety of customers.
  • Arcade, formerly known as Pawn.fi is another popular NFT lending platform. Arcade allows users to wrap multiple NFTs together to be used as collateral for a single loan, meaning users can take out larger loans than on other platforms. Loans on Arcade can be repaid at any time, and in full, giving more flexibility to borrowers. This differentiates Arcade from NFTfi.com.
  • UnUniFi is a NFT CDP platform that claims to have the most flexible Loan-To-Value (LTV) ratio in NFTFi. UnUniFi has an internal NFT marketplace which is used to gather data on NFT price floors. This data is used to determine loan sizing. UnUniFi has three stablecoins that can be minted and loaned out.

In contrast to UnUniFi, all debt positions on JPEG’d have a LTV ratio of 32%. There is some maneuverability, as special requests can be put into the DAO to allow for a higher or lower ratio. As well as having a set debt position, there is a set interest of 2% on all loans at launch. JPEG’d also allows for borrowers to buy insurance on their CDPs.

The Future of NFTFi

NFTFi is emerging as one of the most exciting newer innovations within Web3. This industry solves the liquidity problem that NFTs face by opening up them to a wide variety of new financial use cases which are currently enjoyed by other asset classes.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Tevaera Closes $5 Million Funding Round to Create One-Stop Gaming Ecosystem Powered by zkSync's ZK Stack

    Tevaera, a gaming platform powered by zkSync's ZK Stack, has closed a $5 million funding round led by Laser Digital and Nomura Group. The funding will support Tevaera's mission to create a one-stop gaming ecosystem. The project has attracted prominent investors, including Hashkey Capital, Fenbushi Capital, and Crypto.com Capital. Tevaera has also launched a redesigned website and is preparing to introduce two new games and the first decentralized L3 gaming chain on zkSync.

  • The Hong Kong Securities Regulatory Commission’s official website has listed the Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs and stock codes of China Asset Management, Bosera and Harvest.

    Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission website has listed the Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs of three fund companies, Huaxia, Boshi, and Jiashi, with approval dates all on April 23, 2024. The related funds are not derivative product funds, specifically including:1. Huaxia Bitcoin ETF (BUU163) with share codes of 03042, 09042, and 83042;2. Huaxia Ethereum ETF (BUU164) with share codes of 03046, 09046, and 83046;3. Boshi HashKey Bitcoin ETF (BUU104) with share codes of 03008 and 09008;4. Boshi HashKey Ethereum ETF (BUU105) with share codes of 03009 and 09009;5. Jiashi Bitcoin Spot ETF (BUT244) with share codes of 03439 and 09439;6. Jiashi Ethereum Spot ETF (BUU885) with share codes of 03179 and 09179.

  • Correction: Nigeria’s central bank says “freezing Bybit, KuCoin, OKX, Binance user accounts” is unofficial

    The official X account of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) stated that the announcement "the Central Bank of Nigeria will freeze Bybit, KuCoin, OKX, and Binance user accounts" is not an official release. Previously, according to Cointelegraph, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) issued an instruction requiring all banks and financial institutions to identify individuals or entities trading with cryptocurrency exchanges and ensure that such accounts receive no debit (PND) instructions within six months.

  • Alliance of 314: The X314 contract is suspected to have a hidden additional issuance switch, developers should pay attention to verification

    Alliance of 314 issued a statement claiming that the contract of a certain 314 project has not been open-sourced on the blockchain. As for whether other platforms have open-sourced their contracts, there is a misconception that open-sourcing on other platforms is self-submitted and does not necessarily mean that the contract is deployed on the chain, so there may be unknown hidden issuance. Additionally, the said 314 project announced that it will soon launch a trading platform, and the first requirement for logging into a centralized exchange is to open-source the contract. Open-sourcing is the first thing that any project should do to ensure investor confidence. Referring to the open-sourcing of the 0.1, 0.5, and 0.9 versions before, it can be concluded that there is hidden code in the X314 contract, and therefore it cannot be open-sourced out of fear. The biggest risk warning: after decompiling and querying ethervm, it is highly suspected that a certain 314 has a hidden issuance switch to increase mining pool output and arbitrage. The field is as follows: 0x40c10f19mint(address,uint256). The risk alert level for this switch is the highest level, and generally, ordinary developers do not set this switch.

  • UNVEILING THE CELESTIAL MASTERY: TREVOR JONES’ CRYPTOANGELS PROJECT

    Renowned digital artist Trevor Jones, a visionary in the fusion of traditional art with blockchain technology, is set to transcend boundaries with his latest project, CryptoAngels. This ambitious initiative is not merely an art drop; it’s a comprehensive ecosystem encompassing physical and digital realms, games, and a vibrant community engagement, promising to be a cornerstone event in the NFT landscape of 2024.

  • Binance Founder Faces Potential Three-Year Prison Sentence and $50 Million Fine for Money Laundering and Sanctions Violations

    Binance founder Changpeng Zhao has been recommended a three-year prison sentence by federal prosecutors for violating federal money laundering laws and sanctions. The Department of Justice argued that this sentence would hold him accountable for his intentional criminal conduct and send a message to the world. Zhao made a "business decision" to break the law to attract users, build his company, and line his pockets, according to prosecutors. Along with the prison sentence, DOJ lawyers also requested that Zhao pay the $50 million fine he agreed to as part of a plea deal. Zhao, who is a citizen of the UAE and Canada, has been released on a $175 million bond but must remain in the U.S. until his sentencing on April 30.

  • Market News: South Africa authorizes 75 companies as cryptocurrency service providers

    According to Jinshi news, South Africa has authorized 75 companies as cryptocurrency service providers.

  • Indonesian President: $8.6 billion laundered through cryptocurrency in 2021

    According to Golden Finance News, Indonesian President Joko Widodo stated that he has noticed signs of money laundering through cryptocurrency in 2021, amounting to $8.6 billion (IDR 139 trillion). In addition to cryptocurrencies and NFTs, the president emphasized the need to monitor other potential money laundering tools, including virtual assets, market activities, e-currencies, and AI-driven transactions. Mahendra Siregar, Chairman of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) Committee, responded to the President's directive, stating that when cryptocurrency regulation is transferred to the OJK next year, his agency will supervise these issues.

  • BTC breaks through $67,000

    Tthe market shows that BTC has broken through $67,000 and is now trading at $67,025.99, with a daily increase of 1.12%. The market is volatile, please be prepared for risk control.

  • Bitcoin spot ETF had a total net inflow of $31.6354 million yesterday, and the ETF net asset ratio reached 4.27%

    According to SoSoValue data, the total net inflow of Bitcoin spot ETF was $31.6354 million on April 23 (US Eastern Time).Grayscale ETF GBTC had a net outflow of $66.8838 million on April 23, and the historical net outflow of GBTC is $16.833 billion.The Bitcoin spot ETF with the highest net inflow on April 23 was BlackRock ETF IBIT, with a net inflow of $37.9233 million in a single day, and the historical total net inflow of IBIT has reached $15.479 billion.The second highest was the ARKB ETF from Ark Invest and 21Shares, with a net inflow of $33.282 million in a single day, and the historical total net inflow of ARKB has reached $2.267 billion.As of now, the total net asset value of Bitcoin spot ETF is $55.82 billion, and the ETF net asset ratio (the proportion of market value to the total market value of Bitcoin) is 4.27%, with a historical cumulative net inflow of $12.416 billion.