Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

What Are Appchains?

Validated Venture

The use of such solutions allows developers greater flexibility in designing ecosystems, governance structures, and consensus algorithms for the decentralized applications they create.

How do appchains work?

Appchains operate in a similar manner to a basic blockchain, but on top of it. The primary distinction is that they are app-specific.

Appchains rely on Layer 1 (L1) blockchains in terms of security. Because they do not compete for processing power and storage space with L1 applications, such systems are highly customizable and have significant performance potential.

Such solutions typically have a utility token. It is used for stacking, as the application’s internal currency, and for voting.

Validators from the main network help appchains (if they agree to allocate resources to a particular application).

What advantages does it have?

Using the new approach to application development has several advantages over L1, Layer 2 (L2) solutions, and sidechains. As previously stated, appchains increase system performance and customizability without sacrificing security because they rely on the underlying blockchain.

The direct use of L1 in the creation of dapps involves competing for limited computing resources with other applications. Because developers have no control over the consensus protocol, this is likely to result in performance degradation and a lengthy platform upgrade process.

Because of competition among dapps on the same network, a single popular application can consume a disproportionate amount of resources. This results in higher fees (as seen with the launch of XEN Crypto) and transaction processing delays.

Upchains imply low and predictable transaction costs, which are beneficial to the user experience.

As the popularity of decentralized applications grows, developers may be required to perform advanced customization and optimization of various parameters such as throughput, finality, security level, and degree of availability (permissionless or permissioned).

Upchains allow traditional organizations to immerse themselves in Web3 without making their platforms public from the start. Companies, for example, can initially require KYC compliance from validators, rely on a limited set of developers, and select specific services for cross-chain interactions.

What disadvantages does it have?

The main distinction and, perhaps, limitation of appchains is that they are “locked” to a single application. L2-solutions, on the other hand, can interact with a wide range of dapps.

Appchains imply limited linkability and isolation, which can result in liquidity fragmentation. The problem is largely solved by integrating cross-chain bridges, but the latter are often a target for hackers.

Running and maintaining an appchain can be a waste of time and money if an application is underutilized. Platform-specific validators can effectively leverage resources from other sources.

The operation of an appchain can be complicated in a variety of ways. For example, management of additional infrastructure elements such as sequencers or validators.

Developers may lack ready-made out-of-the-box solutions such as block observers, RPC providers, indexers, oracles, fiat gateways, and so on.

Building L1 solutions has advantages, such as the availability of a massive amount of resources, infrastructure elements, and developer tools (especially beginners). This abundance can make integration with other ecosystems easier.

L2 allows developers to increase the scalability of services without requiring significant changes to the code base.

Because they rely on the underlying blockchain, Layer 2 solutions also imply a high level of security. Optimism and Arbitrum, for example, process transactions quickly and send “fraud proofs” to the main network thanks to Optimistic rollups.

What is the difference between appchains and sidechains?

Sidechains are a parallel network with a two-way connection to the main network, but they do not rely on L1 security. Sidechains differ from L2 in that they do not send transactions to the underlying blockchain.

Upchains are created for a specific application (app-specific). Sidecaps, on the other hand, perform any type of transaction. Their main disadvantage is the lack of security due to limited decentralization.

Polygon Proof of Stake, which is part of the Polygon project ecosystem, is one of the most popular sidechains. Polygon Edge, an open-source development environment for creating L2 solutions, is also included in the latter.

Which projects do have appchains?

Some blockchain projects allow developers to create appchains:

  • Polkadot parachain;
  • Cosmos Zones;
  • Avalanche subnets;
  • Polygon Supernets.

Polkadot parachains

Polkadot is a network of EVM-compatible blockchains, or parachains, that are connected to a central network (Relay Chain). The Relay Chain specializes in validating all related system transactions.

Relay Chain uses the Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism, in which validators stack a DOT (Polkadot native token).

Each validator group is responsible for a specific parachain, which is assigned and maintained by collators: they collect user transactions and validate blocks using the Proof-of-Value algorithm. Collators are compensated for their work as nodes in varying amounts depending on the parachain.

The Polkadot network has a maximum of 100 parachain slots. They are distributed through auctions in which DOT holders vote on which projects should be linked to the Relay Chain.

“Parachain slots can only be acquired for a finite period of two years or less. At the conclusion of the lease, the slot will go back up for auction,” the project’s website explains.

Parachains can also act as bridges between the Polkadot network and external L1 blockchains such as Ethereum.

Such solutions give developers access to all of the appchain features mentioned above, as well as the freedom to choose an economic or management structure that allows utility tokens to be used.

One of the main disadvantages of parachains is the limited number of auction slots available. As a result, such solutions become less affordable.

The Polkadot team is developing paratrades, which are pay-per-use parachains. The solution will allow developers to upload the project code to Relay Chain and launch several collaborators without having to wait for a parachains auction. In the future, paratrades can be upgraded to parachains if they participate in and win auctions.

Polkadot also supports a maximum of 10,000 paratreads.

Another disadvantage of the ecosystem is that it does not support smart contracts. The Polkadot network’s capabilities are thus limited.

The parachains projects:

  • Acala — DeFi-hub for the Polkadot network;
  • Litentry — a cross-chain aggregator of identity solutions.

Get the latest news here: Cointime channel — https://t.me/cointime_en

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Singapore-based Bitcoin Layer2 Project BEVM Raises Tens of Millions in Seed and Series A Funding

    Singapore-based Bitcoin Layer2 project, BEVM, has completed its seed round and part of its Series A round, raising tens of millions of USD from over 20 investors including RockTree Capital, Waterdrip Capital, and ViaBTC Capital. The project's Series A valuation has reached $200m and aims to accelerate its international development and roll-out. BEVM is an EVM-compatible Bitcoin Layer2 network built on Taproot Consensus, which uses $BTC as gas and aims to bring 10% of $BTC into its Layer2 network environment. The project's mainnet is scheduled to launch on March 28th and has already implemented decentralized Bitcoin cross-chain custody services through Schnorr Signature, MAST, and Bitcoin SPVs.

  • Ethereum on-chain DEX transaction volume exceeded $2.1 billion yesterday

    According to DeFiLlama data, the trading volume of DEX on the Ethereum blockchain on March 28th was 2.111 billion US dollars, ranking first. The daily trading volume of DEX on the BSC chain was 1.398 billion US dollars, ranking second; the daily trading volume of DEX on the Solana chain was 1.097 billion US dollars, ranking third.

  • Taiwan’s Ministry of Interior has approved the establishment of a cryptocurrency industry association

    Taiwan's Ministry of the Interior has approved the application of the local cryptocurrency industry to establish an industry association. The local cryptocurrency industry working group, which was established last year to prepare for the establishment of the industry association, said that the working group now needs to complete all preparations and officially establish the cryptocurrency industry association by the end of June as required by the government. The working group is currently composed of 22 cryptocurrency companies, including Taiwan's major exchanges such as MaiCoin and BitoPro. The working group pointed out that ACE Exchange has been expelled from the group because the troubled exchange is under investigation by prosecutors for improper behavior by its former executives.

  • Grayscale ETH Trust negative premium rate is 22.77%

    According to ChainCatcher news and Coinglass data, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust Fund (GBTC) has a premium rate of 0.02%. The Grayscale ETH Trust has a negative premium rate of 22.77%, and the ETC Trust has a negative premium rate of 36.58%.In addition, the Grayscale BCH Trust has a premium rate of 238.13%, the LTC Trust has a premium rate of 380.60%, the SOL Trust has a premium rate of 515.93%, the MANA Trust has a premium rate of 726.65%, the LINK Trust has a premium rate of 713.66%, and the FIL Trust has a premium rate of 3057.89%.

  • Net inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs reached $179 million on March 28

    Spot on Chain, a blockchain data monitoring platform, posted on social media that the net inflow of spot bitcoin ETF on March 28th reached 179 million US dollars, a decrease of 26.9% compared to the previous trading day. After 54 trading days, the total net inflow accumulated to 12.13 billion US dollars, which is the level before the last fully negative trading week. BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) and Grayscale's GBTC both saw a significant slowdown in daily inflows and outflows on March 28th.

  • Bitcoin spot ETF had a total net inflow of US$179 million yesterday, and the ETF net asset ratio reached 4.25%

    According to SoSoValue data, the Bitcoin spot ETF had a total net inflow of $179 million yesterday (March 28th, US Eastern Time).Yesterday, Grayscale's ETF GBTC had a net outflow of $104 million, and its historical net outflow is $14.77 billion. The Bitcoin spot ETF with the highest net inflow yesterday was BlackRock's ETF IBIT, with a net inflow of approximately $95.12 million, and its historical total net inflow has reached $13.96 billion. The second is Fidelity's ETF FBTC, with a net inflow of approximately $68.09 million yesterday, and its historical total net inflow has reached $7.56 billion.As of now, the total net asset value of Bitcoin spot ETF is $59.1 billion, and the ETF net asset ratio (market value compared to the total market value of Bitcoin) is 4.25%, with a historical total net inflow of $12.12 billion.

  • Ethereum Inscription ETHS rose over 95% in 24H

    CoinGecko data shows that Ethereum Inscription ETHS has risen by 95.9% in the last 24 hours, now reporting at 7.51 USDT. Earlier, Ethereum founder Vitalik released the latest long article "Ethereum has blobs. Where do we go from here?". As a result of this news, the price of Ethereum Inscription ETHS soared.

  • Binance exec sues Nigeria’s National Security Agency over detention

    According to CoinGape, Tigran Gambaryan, a detained executive of Binance, has filed a lawsuit against the National Security Adviser (NSA) and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in Nigeria. Local media reported that on March 28th, Tigran Gambaryan sued the National Security Agency, accusing it of violating his basic human rights and seeking five major remedies from the court.He urged the court to approve the return of his passport and to release him immediately after more than three weeks of detention. He also requested a ban on future detention in similar investigations and demanded public apologies from the National Security Agency and the EFCC.In addition, he requested that the court pay the full amount of compensation for the lawsuit.

  • Vitalik: As L2 transaction costs decrease, there’s no reason why Ethereum can’t be widely adopted

    After the upgrade and introduction of blobs on Ethereum Dencun, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin shared his insights on the future direction of Ethereum's expansion. Vitalik emphasized the transformation of Ethereum's expansion from basic expansion work to centralized, progressive enhancement. Vitalik also stated that developers' focus will shift to the application layer. Ethereum will maintain its roadmap centered on L2, and applications will migrate from L1 to L2 to benefit from faster and more cost-effective transactions. An upcoming upgrade is Data Availability Sampling (DAS), which aims to increase the data space for each slot to 16 MB. Progressive expansion improvements include gradually increasing blob capacity, improving data compression, and EIP-7623 (aimed at reducing maximum block size). Vitalik pointed out that with the reduction of L2 transaction costs, there is no reason why Ethereum should not be widely adopted.

  • Vitalik: Humanity needs to create a world where blockchain and artificial intelligence work together

    Vitalik Buterin, the founder of Ethereum, stated at BiddleAsia 2024 held at Signiel Seoul in the Songpa district on March 28 that artificial intelligence is a huge market and its importance is increasing day by day. We need to create a world where blockchain and artificial intelligence work together. Artificial intelligence can now create applications with 100 to 500 lines of code. Vitalik also stated that the ability to write 10,000 lines of code can eliminate most of the bugs in the Ethereum virtual machine.