Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

What a EU Ban on Privacy Coins Means

Validated Media

Just over a week ago, CoinDesk reported that the EU would enact rules that would effectively ban cryptocurrencies that utilize privacy-preserving technologies. The article reported that the draft came from officials from the Czech Republic and would not directly make the use of the cryptocurrency illegal, but would prohibit credit, financial institutions, and crypto-asset providers from being able to use them. This is in large part an amendment to AML (Anti-Money Laundering) rules that were drafted last year and would further tighten the screws on privacy-based projects.

The details included in the leaked Czech proposal were the following:

Crypto asset providers will be obliged to verify customers’ identity even for occasional transactions less than €1,000

Larger payments will require a probe into the nature and purpose of the business

Crypto service providers doing business outside of the EU will need additional requirements on the counterparty to ensure that they are licensed and what AML controls they have in place

Myopia in Decision Making

A common pitfall from regulators in trying to put regulations on crypto is that they’re developed with good intentions, but usually fail to actually solve the root of the problem.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions

A principal driver for all these attacks on privacy coins and cryptocurrency in general, is to deter bad behavior on the chain. The irony of this predicament is that those who are well-versed in blockchain technology would know that an immutable ledger is not an ideal way to carry out nefarious activity. The best privacy coin to transact with while doing illegal activities is fiat. The obstacles of managing and moving funds tied to illegal activities are so much harder on-chain that fiat makes more sense to do it. Although privacy coins by default have ways to obfuscate transactional data, for criminals it’s all about moving cash gained through illegal measures and using that case. This would mean that regardless if they used privacy coins, they would need on/off ramps to effectively manage the movement and usage of these funds. It’s easy to make an uneducated presumption that privacy coins are ideal for criminals, but in actuality, it complicates the process more than it probably is worth.

Regulations also have had little effect on deterring criminal activities. Typically, regulators try to have a heavy hand on topics that are controversial and/or have a buzz around them. The FTX scandal is a prime example of how regulators are looking into how to regulate crypto, but the failure and crimes committed were not caused by blockchain/cryptocurrency. This attack on privacy is an extension of the same argument, where politicians and regulators (many of whom don’t have the least idea of how it all works) want to stamp their authority and “control” how things will work in their jurisdiction.

Preserving Privacy

At Conceal Network, the right to privacy is an utmost, non-negotiable right. Unlike a driver’s license where you need to get permission to drive, privacy is a right and the ability to handle transactions not under the watching eye of “Big Brother” or anyone else is critical. The technology utilized by Conceal enables the obfuscation of transaction data, making it untraceable and unlinkable so that anyone can transact with another party and not need to worry about that information being publicly available. The community and Conceal team would unanimously agree that these attacks on privacy coins are unfounded and ill-developed. The intended effect of these proposals by the EU is more an attack on an individual’s privacy than on any illegal activities or movement of funds.

As a community, we must make our voices heard and reach out to our local, regional, and national politicians and voice our concerns. Also, take the time to spread and educate family and friends about how privacy coins work and how any laws against them are so far off from making any real dent in minimizing crime. The key is generating a voice, supporting privacy-preserving projects like Conceal, and educating/discussing with others about blockchain/cryptocurrency. Lastly take time to dispel much of the negative connotation that has been developed by media/governments in interactions with people who are non-native crypto people.

EU
Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • CoinShares Mining Report Update: Our Insights at the 2024 Halving

    Published to coincide with the 2024 Bitcoin halving, this research article aims to update and inform investors about the risks and opportunities facing the Bitcoin mining industry. Recently, we updated our data primarily based on the Q4 2023 reported figures. We have found that the average production cost per Bitcoin among listed mining companies is now approximately US$53,000.

  • Scammers use Google to promote fake Whales Market website to steal cryptocurrency

    According to a report from BleepingComputer, threat actors have discovered a method where scammers use Google's platform to promote phishing websites impersonating Whales Market in order to steal cryptocurrency. These fraudulent websites are placed as sponsored links (i.e. advertisements) at the top of Google search result pages, and despite the domain address displayed on the search result page appearing to be real, users will be redirected to the fake website upon clicking.

  • Elven CEO Junxiu Guo: Tokenization of Digital Assets Expands the Categories of Financial Assets

    On April 19, the 6th International Blockchain Science Conference ISC2024 was successfully held in Singapore. This event was co-hosted by the Inclusive Fintech Node (NiFT) at Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS) and the British Blockchain Association (BBA). Researchers and industry experts from around the world specializing in Web3, cryptocurrencies, and blockchain gathered together.

  • Cyvers: Hedgey suffered the same vulnerability on Arbitrum and lost about $42.8 million

    Cyvers Alerts on X platform stated that the system detected that the financial derivative agreement Hedgey Finance executed the same vulnerability on the ARB chain and gained approximately 42.8 million US dollars in profit.

  • Tether issues 1 billion USDT on Ethereum (authorized but not yet issued)

    Whale Alert has monitored Tether Treasury's addition of 1 billion USDT on Ethereum. Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino stated that this 1 billion USDT is a supplement to Ethereum inventory. This is an authorized but unissued transaction, which means that this issuance will be used for the next issuance request and cross-chain exchange inventory.

  • CertiK: Hedgey vulnerability was exploited and $1.9 million was stolen

    CertiK Alert posted on social media that it has detected that the on-chain token infrastructure protocol Hedgey has been exploited and stolen approximately 1.9 million US dollars.The attacker abused the createLockedCampaign function in flash loans to obtain approval for the use of tokens on the victim's contract. The USDC, NOBL, and MASA tokens in the victim's contract have been depleted.

  • Binance executives' bail application postponed again, still in custody

    The bail hearing for Binance executive Tigran Gambaryan has been postponed again by a Nigerian court, and he remains detained at the Kuje Correctional Center. The hearing is now scheduled for April 22, with the EFCC requesting time to respond to new arguments from the defense. Gambaryan's lawyer criticized the prosecution for failing to respond promptly. Binance has been accused of concealing the source of its income, while Gambaryan is accused of money laundering. In addition, he has also filed a lawsuit against the government for violating his human rights.

  • BTC breaks through $64,000

    The market shows BTC breaking through $64,000, now reporting at $64,012.44, with an intraday increase of 4.95%. The market fluctuates greatly, so please be prepared for risk control.

  • SEC accuses Justin Sun of frequent trips to the U.S. to sell tokens

    The US SEC has amended its lawsuit against Tron founder Sun Yuchen, stating that his frequent travel to multiple locations in the US allows the court to have corresponding jurisdiction. The SEC accuses Sun Yuchen and his company of selling unregistered securities through Tron and BitTorrent (BTT) tokens and engaging in manipulative money laundering transactions. The SEC claims that Sun Yuchen spent more than 380 days in the US from 2017 to 2019, with travel destinations including New York, Boston, and San Francisco. Sun Yuchen argues that the token sales were conducted entirely overseas, avoiding the US market, and therefore the SEC has no jurisdiction over him and the Tron Foundation, which is headquartered in Singapore. (Cointelegraph)

  • Cyvers Alerts: Multiple phishing transactions detected this morning

    Cyvers Alerts reported on X platform that multiple phishing transactions were discovered by the system this morning. The victims have approved the external owned accounts (EOA) of the phishers. We strongly recommend revoking the relevant approvals.