Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

The ‘Elon Effect’ Shows How Opinion Leaders Shape the FinTech Market

Validated Individual Expert

The power that influencers have in affecting public perception and therefore causing alterations in the value of a product, service, asset or currency has increased to the point where they can crash or uplift entire markets with their content and takes. 

The Elon Effect

In 2021, Elon Musk could send the price of the famous memecoin Dogecoin (DOGE) up by 50% with just a single tweet. He still has a lot of power over the crypto markets, and several people in the cryptocurrency world and traditional finance have accused Musk of manipulating the cryptocurrency market with just a few tweets.

Other popular influencers could cause similar effects through social media posts or promotional videos. But why do they have so much power? Well, it’s all down to the power of influencer marketing; research shows that approximately 80% of consumers are more likely to buy products promoted by influencers instead of ads.

In the case of the crypto market, digital advertising has been partially irrelevant throughout the years due to multiple factors, the main one being that Google, Twitter and other social media platforms had banned crypto ads in the past. Therefore, promoting coins/tokens via influencers was the main marketing alternative for many cryptocurrency projects.

Let’s take FTX, for example — one of the top three crypto exchanges. It went from being an almost $40 billion crypto powerhouse to filing for bankruptcy. Its founder, Sam Bankman-Fried, has been seen posting strange, cryptic messages on Twitter following the FTX meltdown. Why? Who knows. But it’s leaving users, investors and even FTX employees confused.

With these ongoing shady and unclear messages, he is just adding more fuel to speculations and all sorts of theories — which only worsens the current scenario for the cryptocurrency industry.

Why we shouldn’t follow advice from influencers

The first, most important problem? Influencers’ advice and opinions are not always absolute or necessarily correct.

Even more, some of these influencers might not even have any familiarity or knowledge whatsoever about the product/asset/coin they’re promoting. Such was the case with reality TV star Kim Kardashian, who received $250,000 for promoting EthereumMax, a smart contract-enabled platform for building decentralized applications. Kardashian then had to pay $1.26 million in penalties, disgorgement and interest to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

“This case is a reminder that, when celebrities or influencers endorse investment opportunities, including crypto asset securities, it doesn’t mean that those investment products are right for all investors," SEC Chairman Gary Gensler said in a statement at the time.

This raises an obvious question that a lot of people do not seem to ask themselves: Should we really buy something from a TV reality star who has never had anything to do with cryptocurrencies?

Another problem with influencers that needs to be mentioned is that a lot of them can be found violating advertising rules and misleading investors with shady products/assets. In the case of India, crypto influencers are responsible for 92% of crypto ad violations.

The solution to these problems: Always DYOR — do your own research. It’s understandable that not everybody has the time to investigate a project or currency before investing in it, but it’s not reasonable to blindly follow advice from crypto influencers, either. Investors should take the time to personally check a potential investment instrument and find answers to the main questions that concern them.

The power opinion leaders have in today’s markets

Influencers have been heavily criticized for pumping or dumping cryptocurrencies in which they have a position in the market. For example, in 2017, the late John McAfee admitted to charging crypto projects more than $100,000 per tweet to promote their initial coin offerings, as well as taking a considerable percentage of their token supplies.

1/ Let’s review all the direct scams Bitboy has worked with in the past. Just in case you forgot here is the flyer with how much he charges. I received this a while back by posing as a project interested in a promotion. pic.twitter.com/FkC9HUDGsc

— ZachXBT (@zachxbt) January 3, 2022

Popular crypto influencer Ben Armstrong, aka BitBoy Crypto, also admitted to receiving payments from crypto projects to promote them on his YouTube channel for years — which led many of his viewers to suffer considerable losses.

Love or hate influencers, they need to be regulated

There are more examples that could be brought up here. But the main point is that promoting a cryptocurrency project or a coin almost feels like a synonym for “scam” in today’s crypto market.

Therefore, it seems sensible that countries and jurisdictions around the globe should lay out proper guidelines to regulate the level of influence that opinion leaders have. A good example of influencer regulation comes from Spain. The Mediterranean country established a set of rules that all influencers must follow before promoting cryptocurrencies. Otherwise, they face fines of up to 300,000 euros (just above $316,000).

Influencers have a great deal of power over the crypto market: With a single social media post, they can deter or catapult an entire crypto product or coin. And the bigger the influencer, the bigger their effect on the market. Therefore, they should be held accountable for their words and actions. If it takes official regulation to make this happen, so be it.

Vladimir Gorbunov is the founder and CEO of Choise.com. He previously worked as the CEO of Workle, an internet-based sales and servicing platform. He graduated from Finlandia University with an International Business Degree.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Tevaera Closes $5 Million Funding Round to Create One-Stop Gaming Ecosystem Powered by zkSync's ZK Stack

    Tevaera, a gaming platform powered by zkSync's ZK Stack, has closed a $5 million funding round led by Laser Digital and Nomura Group. The funding will support Tevaera's mission to create a one-stop gaming ecosystem. The project has attracted prominent investors, including Hashkey Capital, Fenbushi Capital, and Crypto.com Capital. Tevaera has also launched a redesigned website and is preparing to introduce two new games and the first decentralized L3 gaming chain on zkSync.

  • The Hong Kong Securities Regulatory Commission’s official website has listed the Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs and stock codes of China Asset Management, Bosera and Harvest.

    Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission website has listed the Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs of three fund companies, Huaxia, Boshi, and Jiashi, with approval dates all on April 23, 2024. The related funds are not derivative product funds, specifically including:1. Huaxia Bitcoin ETF (BUU163) with share codes of 03042, 09042, and 83042;2. Huaxia Ethereum ETF (BUU164) with share codes of 03046, 09046, and 83046;3. Boshi HashKey Bitcoin ETF (BUU104) with share codes of 03008 and 09008;4. Boshi HashKey Ethereum ETF (BUU105) with share codes of 03009 and 09009;5. Jiashi Bitcoin Spot ETF (BUT244) with share codes of 03439 and 09439;6. Jiashi Ethereum Spot ETF (BUU885) with share codes of 03179 and 09179.

  • Correction: Nigeria’s central bank says “freezing Bybit, KuCoin, OKX, Binance user accounts” is unofficial

    The official X account of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) stated that the announcement "the Central Bank of Nigeria will freeze Bybit, KuCoin, OKX, and Binance user accounts" is not an official release. Previously, according to Cointelegraph, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) issued an instruction requiring all banks and financial institutions to identify individuals or entities trading with cryptocurrency exchanges and ensure that such accounts receive no debit (PND) instructions within six months.

  • Alliance of 314: The X314 contract is suspected to have a hidden additional issuance switch, developers should pay attention to verification

    Alliance of 314 issued a statement claiming that the contract of a certain 314 project has not been open-sourced on the blockchain. As for whether other platforms have open-sourced their contracts, there is a misconception that open-sourcing on other platforms is self-submitted and does not necessarily mean that the contract is deployed on the chain, so there may be unknown hidden issuance. Additionally, the said 314 project announced that it will soon launch a trading platform, and the first requirement for logging into a centralized exchange is to open-source the contract. Open-sourcing is the first thing that any project should do to ensure investor confidence. Referring to the open-sourcing of the 0.1, 0.5, and 0.9 versions before, it can be concluded that there is hidden code in the X314 contract, and therefore it cannot be open-sourced out of fear. The biggest risk warning: after decompiling and querying ethervm, it is highly suspected that a certain 314 has a hidden issuance switch to increase mining pool output and arbitrage. The field is as follows: 0x40c10f19mint(address,uint256). The risk alert level for this switch is the highest level, and generally, ordinary developers do not set this switch.

  • UNVEILING THE CELESTIAL MASTERY: TREVOR JONES’ CRYPTOANGELS PROJECT

    Renowned digital artist Trevor Jones, a visionary in the fusion of traditional art with blockchain technology, is set to transcend boundaries with his latest project, CryptoAngels. This ambitious initiative is not merely an art drop; it’s a comprehensive ecosystem encompassing physical and digital realms, games, and a vibrant community engagement, promising to be a cornerstone event in the NFT landscape of 2024.

  • Binance Founder Faces Potential Three-Year Prison Sentence and $50 Million Fine for Money Laundering and Sanctions Violations

    Binance founder Changpeng Zhao has been recommended a three-year prison sentence by federal prosecutors for violating federal money laundering laws and sanctions. The Department of Justice argued that this sentence would hold him accountable for his intentional criminal conduct and send a message to the world. Zhao made a "business decision" to break the law to attract users, build his company, and line his pockets, according to prosecutors. Along with the prison sentence, DOJ lawyers also requested that Zhao pay the $50 million fine he agreed to as part of a plea deal. Zhao, who is a citizen of the UAE and Canada, has been released on a $175 million bond but must remain in the U.S. until his sentencing on April 30.

  • Market News: South Africa authorizes 75 companies as cryptocurrency service providers

    According to Jinshi news, South Africa has authorized 75 companies as cryptocurrency service providers.

  • Indonesian President: $8.6 billion laundered through cryptocurrency in 2021

    According to Golden Finance News, Indonesian President Joko Widodo stated that he has noticed signs of money laundering through cryptocurrency in 2021, amounting to $8.6 billion (IDR 139 trillion). In addition to cryptocurrencies and NFTs, the president emphasized the need to monitor other potential money laundering tools, including virtual assets, market activities, e-currencies, and AI-driven transactions. Mahendra Siregar, Chairman of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) Committee, responded to the President's directive, stating that when cryptocurrency regulation is transferred to the OJK next year, his agency will supervise these issues.

  • BTC breaks through $67,000

    Tthe market shows that BTC has broken through $67,000 and is now trading at $67,025.99, with a daily increase of 1.12%. The market is volatile, please be prepared for risk control.

  • Bitcoin spot ETF had a total net inflow of $31.6354 million yesterday, and the ETF net asset ratio reached 4.27%

    According to SoSoValue data, the total net inflow of Bitcoin spot ETF was $31.6354 million on April 23 (US Eastern Time).Grayscale ETF GBTC had a net outflow of $66.8838 million on April 23, and the historical net outflow of GBTC is $16.833 billion.The Bitcoin spot ETF with the highest net inflow on April 23 was BlackRock ETF IBIT, with a net inflow of $37.9233 million in a single day, and the historical total net inflow of IBIT has reached $15.479 billion.The second highest was the ARKB ETF from Ark Invest and 21Shares, with a net inflow of $33.282 million in a single day, and the historical total net inflow of ARKB has reached $2.267 billion.As of now, the total net asset value of Bitcoin spot ETF is $55.82 billion, and the ETF net asset ratio (the proportion of market value to the total market value of Bitcoin) is 4.27%, with a historical cumulative net inflow of $12.416 billion.