Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Smart Contract Security: Protecting Digital Assets

Validated Project

Smart contracts are automated computer programs that facilitate the execution of agreements between parties without the need for intermediaries. These digital agreements operate on blockchain networks and can be used for a variety of purposes, such as trading assets, handling financial transactions, and enforcing the terms of a legal contract. While smart contracts are in many ways much more secure than a traditional agreement, the digitization of contracts has led to some unique smart contract security considerations.

What is Smart Contract Security?

Security — in the context of smart contracts — refers to the prevention of unauthorized access, modification, or theft of the assets and agreements that smart contracts hold. Smart contracts are designed to automate the execution of contractual terms, including the transfer of digital assets. Smart contracts are immutable, meaning that once they are deployed on the blockchain network, they cannot be modified.

NFTs, DeFi, and all of Web3 rely on smart contracts. With tens of billions of dollars held in various Web3 platforms, smart contract security is of critical importance. More than $3.7 billion of value was stolen from Web3 protocols and users in 2022 in hundreds of separate exploits and incidents. As blockchain technology is still in its early stages of development, there are a number of challenges associated with its implementation. These challenges include scalability, interoperability, and privacy. Security is a critical part of addressing these challenges, as secure systems can help prevent attacks and ensure the integrity and reliability of blockchain networks and the value and data they secure.

Smart contract security risks can arise from several factors, such as code bugs, vulnerabilities in the underlying blockchain network, and flaws in the programming language used to create smart contracts. Once a smart contract is deployed, it becomes immutable, meaning that its code cannot be altered. Therefore, if there are any security vulnerabilities in the smart contract, they can be exploited by attackers to steal digital assets or disrupt the normal functioning of the contract.

One of the most significant smart contract security risks is the potential presence of coding errors. Smart contracts are created using programming languages such as Solidity, which is specifically designed for creating smart contracts running on the Ethereum virtual machine. Solidity is a relatively new programming language, and developers may not be familiar with its syntax and rules. This lack of familiarity can result in coding errors that can be exploited by attackers.

Another smart contract security risk is the possibility of a 51% attack on the underlying blockchain network. In a 51% attack, an attacker gains control of 51% of the computing power of the blockchain network, allowing them to manipulate the network’s transactions and create fake and/or fraudulent transactions. This can result in the theft of digital assets from smart contracts or the modification of the contracts themselves.

Smart Contract Security Measures

To mitigate the risks associated with smart contracts, several security measures can be implemented. These measures include:

  • Code Auditing: Code auditing involves reviewing the smart contract’s code to identify and fix any coding errors or vulnerabilities. Smart contract code auditing leverages the knowledge and experience of blockchain security experts and their skill in controlling automated tools to achieve the highest level of code security.
  • Penetration Testing: Penetration testing involves attempting to exploit the smart contract’s security vulnerabilities to identify weaknesses in the contract’s design. Penetration testing can be done manually or using automated tools such as fuzz testers. Fuzz testers are software tools that can generate random inputs to the smart contract to test for unexpected behavior.
  • Formal Verification: Formal verification involves using mathematical proofs to ensure that the smart contract behaves correctly under all possible scenarios. Formal verification can be used to ensure that the smart contract does not have any logic errors or security vulnerabilities.
  • Multi-Signature Wallets: Multi-signature wallets require more than one person to approve a transaction or contract upgrade before it is executed. This can prevent unauthorized access to digital assets and provide an additional layer of security to smart contracts.

Smart Contract Security Best Practices

In addition to the above security measures, there are several best practices that can be followed to ensure the security of smart contracts:

  • Follow the Principle of Least Privilege: The principle of least privilege states that a smart contract should only have the necessary permissions to execute its intended functions. This means that the contract should not have access to any unnecessary data or functions that could be exploited by attackers. By following this principle, developers can limit the potential damage that can be caused by a security breach.
  • Use Open-Source Libraries: Open-source libraries can be used to reduce the risk of coding errors and security vulnerabilities. These libraries have been reviewed and tested by a large community of developers and are less likely to contain vulnerabilities. However, developers should still review the code of these libraries to ensure that they are safe to use for their project’s specific needs.
  • Use a Timelock: Timelocks can be used to prevent unauthorized access to digital assets. A timelock can be set to delay the execution of a transaction until a specific time or block height. This can prevent attackers from stealing digital assets or disrupting the normal functioning of the contract.
  • Test the Smart Contract on a Testnet: Before deploying a smart contract to the mainnet, developers should test the contract on a testnet. Testnets are blockchain networks that are used for testing purposes and do not contain real digital assets. Testing the contract on a testnet can help developers identify any potential issues before deploying the contract to the mainnet.
  • Use a Bug Bounty Program: Bug bounty programs can be used to incentivize ethical hackers to identify and report security vulnerabilities in a smart contract. By offering rewards for finding vulnerabilities, developers can identify and fix issues before attackers can exploit them.

Why You Need a Smart Contract Security Expert

When it comes to securing your smart contracts, you need a Web3 security expert. Smart contract security differs from non-blockchain security in several ways:

  • Immutable nature: One of the key characteristics of blockchain-based smart contracts is their immutability. Once a smart contract is deployed on the blockchain, it cannot be altered. This means that any bugs or vulnerabilities in the code cannot be fixed, and any funds locked in the contract may be lost forever.
  • Limited programming languages: Smart contracts are typically programmed using a limited set of languages, such as Solidity for Ethereum-based contracts. These languages have specific features and limitations that require developers to take extra care when writing code to ensure that it is secure.
  • Decentralization: Smart contracts are executed on a decentralized network, meaning that there is no central authority overseeing their operation. This can make it difficult to detect and prevent security breaches, as there is no single point of control.
  • Economic incentives: Smart contracts typically involve financial transactions, which can attract malicious actors looking to exploit vulnerabilities in the code. The decentralized nature of blockchain-based systems also means that there is no central authority to reimburse users in the event of a security breach or loss of funds.
  • Smart contract auditing: Auditing smart contracts for security vulnerabilities is a complex and specialized process that requires knowledge of both blockchain technology and traditional software security best practices. As smart contract technology is still relatively new, there are few experts in the field, making auditing services expensive and hard to come by.

Smart contracts are a promising technology that are poised to revolutionize the way we do business. However, as with any technology, there are considerations to take into account about their unique security vulnerabilities. Smart contract security risks can arise from several factors, such as code bugs, vulnerabilities in the underlying blockchain network, and flaws in the programming language used to create smart contracts.

To mitigate the risks associated with smart contracts, several security measures can be implemented, such as code auditing, penetration testing, formal verification, multi-signature wallets, and more. By implementing these security measures, we can protect digital assets and ensure the safe and secure use of smart contracts. At CertiK, it’s our mission to secure the Web3 world, and smart contract security is a fundamental part of that.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Nigeria accuses Binance of laundering $35.4 million, and a hearing on the detention of Binance executives will be held on April 4

    Nigerian government has accused Binance of money laundering, with an amount involved of $35.4 million. After EFCC submitted documents on Thursday, Binance currently faces two separate criminal charges in Nigeria. The Federal Inland Revenue Service (the country's tax authority) has also accused the exchange of tax evasion. In addition to the criminal proceedings, the Nigerian government is also seeking to extend the detention period for Binance executives. The case will continue with a hearing on April 4.

  • What else could memecoins be?

    Ten years ago, two weeks before the Ethereum project was publicly announced, I published this post on Bitcoin magazine arguing that issuing coins could be a new way to fund important public projects. The thinking went: society needs ways to fund valuable large-scale projects, markets and institutions (both corporations and governments) are the main techniques that we have today, and both work in some cases and fail in others. Issuing new coins seems like a third class of large-scale funding technology, and it seems different enough from both markets and institutions that it would succeed and fail in different places - and so it could fill in some important gaps.

  • My short crypto writing story

    When I was younger, I often found myself deeply frustrated. I’ve been pissed off with the financial system since 2008. I was puzzled and disgusted with the greed and corporate socialism the crisis exposed. Watching Margin Call and Big Short only intensified my feelings.

  • State of the Network’s Q1 2024 Mining Data Special

    Our quarterly update on Bitcoin mining, zeroing in on recovering revenues, public miner strategies, and increased energy usage

  • Introducing Accrual-Based Recurring Payments for Decentralized Platforms

    Automatic recurring payments have become a critical revenue stream for businesses in almost every sector, providing a reliable incremental cash flow to support business processes. Some real-world use cases are displayed in the following figure.

  • Blob Preconfirmations with Inclusion Lists to Mitigate Blob Contention and Censorship

    In this post, we describe an out-of-protocol mechanism for blob inclusion preconfirmations. It allows preconfirmation providers to bid in an auction to become the leader for the subsequent slot. The auction winner can then accept bids on blob inclusions and issue preconfirmations to the bidders.

  • Bitcoin Layer 2 Project Bitlayer Launches $50 Million Ecosystem Incentive Program

    Bitlayer, a Bitcoin Layer2 infrastructure project based on the BitVM paradigm, announced the launch of a $50 million ecological incentive plan to promote the development of its mainnet ecosystem. The first phase of the incentive program, named "Ready Player One," will begin registration at 09:00 UTC on March 29th, 2024 and end at 09:00 UTC on April 29th, 2024, and will officially start after the Bitlayer mainnet is launched. Specific rules and reward allocation guidelines for the event will be disclosed in subsequent announcements. Through the "Ready Player One" and other ecological incentive plans, Bitlayer aims to accelerate ecosystem development and incentivize projects to deploy on the Bitlayer mainnet. In addition, Bitlayer promises comprehensive ecosystem support for all projects, including potential foundation and institutional investment, initial liquidity support, comprehensive product development resources, guidance and investment opportunities from top incubators, support from the Bitcoin community and OGs, ecosystem cooperation, and co-creation.

  • Stablecoin protocol Ethena on BNBChain has been hacked

    The stablecoin protocol Ethena on BNBChain has been hacked, causing a loss of 480 BNB, worth about $290,000, as monitored by PeckShieldAlert.

  • Singapore-based Bitcoin Layer2 Project BEVM Raises Tens of Millions in Seed and Series A Funding

    Singapore-based Bitcoin Layer2 project, BEVM, has completed its seed round and part of its Series A round, raising tens of millions of USD from over 20 investors including RockTree Capital, Waterdrip Capital, and ViaBTC Capital. The project's Series A valuation has reached $200m and aims to accelerate its international development and roll-out. BEVM is an EVM-compatible Bitcoin Layer2 network built on Taproot Consensus, which uses $BTC as gas and aims to bring 10% of $BTC into its Layer2 network environment. The project's mainnet is scheduled to launch on March 28th and has already implemented decentralized Bitcoin cross-chain custody services through Schnorr Signature, MAST, and Bitcoin SPVs.

  • Ethereum on-chain DEX transaction volume exceeded $2.1 billion yesterday

    According to DeFiLlama data, the trading volume of DEX on the Ethereum blockchain on March 28th was 2.111 billion US dollars, ranking first. The daily trading volume of DEX on the BSC chain was 1.398 billion US dollars, ranking second; the daily trading volume of DEX on the Solana chain was 1.097 billion US dollars, ranking third.