Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

How DeFi is Different From CeFi: DeFi vs CeFi

Validated Individual Expert

Understanding Decentralized Finance (DeFi): A Peer-to-Peer Financial Technology

Decentralized finance (DeFi) is a rising financial technology that operates on secure distributed ledgers, akin to those utilized by cryptocurrencies. In the United States, centralized financial institutions such as banks and brokerages are regulated by the Federal Reserve and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which directly provide consumers with access to capital and financial services. DeFi undermines the centralized financial system by enabling individuals to engage in peer-to-peer digital exchanges.

By using DeFi, individuals can eliminate the fees that banks and other financial companies typically charge for utilizing their services. With a secure digital wallet, people can transfer funds in just minutes, and anyone with an internet connection can take advantage of DeFi.

Understanding CeFi: Centralized Finance Explained

CeFi, short for centralized finance, is a financial process that allows users to obtain loans, earn interest, and purchase or sell cryptocurrencies through a centralized institution. These institutions usually include centralized exchanges (CEX) or other establishments that provide yield on crypto investments.

The purpose of CeFi is to make financial services as efficient and cost-effective as possible while ensuring fair exchanges during cryptocurrency transactions. With CeFi, users can access various financial services such as borrowing funds, trading cryptocurrencies, using crypto debit cards for purchases, and earning rewards, among others.

What are Some Differences Between CeFi and DeFi?

CeFi refers to centralized finance, where financial services are provided by centralized entities such as banks and other financial institutions. DeFi, on the other hand, stands for decentralized finance, which refers to financial services provided on a decentralized network like a blockchain.

Some of the differences between CeFi and DeFi include:

DeFi vs CeFi

  1. Public Verifiability: DeFi applications must be publicly verifiable on a blockchain, unlike CeFi.
  2. Atomicity: Atomicity allows a blockchain transaction to be performed in sequential actions, making it either complete with all activities or fail collectively. This feature is programmable in DeFi, while in CeFi, legal agreements might be used to enforce it, which could be expensive and slow.
  3. Anonymous Development and Deployment: Anonymous teams create and manage many DeFi projects. In contrast, CeFi provides users with less anonymity than transactions in DeFi.
  4. Custody: DeFi allows customers to directly control their assets, while centralized exchanges are popular for keeping cryptocurrency assets.
  5. Trading of Crypto Assets: CEXs operate with limit order books, while DEXs use AMM protocols to determine prices.
  6. Execution Order Malleability: Users can openly share the transactions they intend to complete via a peer-to-peer network in permissionless blockchains, allowing for transaction fee bidding contests to steer the transaction execution order, leading to many market manipulation tactics.
  7. Transaction Costs: DeFi transactions have transaction fees, while financial institutions in CeFi can offer transaction services at no cost.
  8. Non-Stop Market Hours: DeFi markets are open 24 hours a day, seven days a week, while CeFi markets have working hours.
  9. Privacy: DeFi provides pseudo-anonymity, while centralized exchanges with AML policies reveal address ownership to law enforcement.
  10. Arbitrage Risks: Arbitrage on centralized and hybrid exchanges is inherently exposed to market price swings, while arbitrage between two decentralized exchanges on the same blockchain can be deemed risk-free.
  11. Inflation: Inflation occurs when the value of a currency depreciates due to an increase in its supply. While central banks control the production of fiat currency, the DeFi world has several cryptocurrencies that are subject to supply changes. While Bitcoin may face scarcity issues, it may also face security vulnerabilities without a block reward and inflation. It is still uncertain whether cryptocurrencies can solve the problem of income disparity caused by inflation.
  12. Cross-chain services: Cross-chain services enable the trading of major coins generated on separate blockchains. DeFi services do not support these tokens due to the complexity of completing atomic cross-chain exchanges, so CeFi services have an advantage in this regard.
  13. Fiat conversion: Fiat conversion flexibility is another aspect that CeFi services excel. Centralized institutions are required for fiat-to-cryptocurrency conversions, and most DeFi providers do not offer fiat on-ramps. Additionally, customers can be onboarded faster with CeFi, leading to a better customer experience.

What are the key features that differ between CeFi and DeFi?

CeFi vs DeFi

CeFi and DeFi: Understanding the Concepts and Their Use Cases

Cryptocurrency has given rise to two distinct types of platforms — CeFi and DeFi. CeFi, or centralized finance, refers to platforms that are run by a centralized authority, while DeFi, or decentralized finance, platforms operate on a decentralized network. Both CeFi and DeFi offer unique use cases in the world of cryptocurrency.

Some examples of DeFi platforms offer decentralized solutions for financial applications.

Totle provides a decentralized exchange that aggregates liquidity from various decentralized exchanges.

Augur is a decentralized prediction market, while Nexus Mutual is a decentralized insurance platform.

MakerDAO is a DeFi platform that allows users to generate a stablecoin using collateral, while bZx is a decentralized lending and margin trading platform.

CeFi platforms include:

Coinbase, which provides a user-friendly interface for buying, selling, and storing cryptocurrencies, and BlockFi, which allows users to earn interest on their cryptocurrencies.

Fairlay is a popular platform for sports betting, while Celsius and Ledn offer loans backed by cryptocurrency.

Libra is a global cryptocurrency that aims to provide a stable and secure means of transaction.

Conclusion

To improve the trading volume and popularity of crypto trading, both Centralized Finance (CeFi) and Decentralized Finance (DeFi) aim to achieve the same goal. However, they differ in their approach.

CeFi prioritizes the security of funds and fair trading practices. Investors can trade crypto with conventional currency and enjoy customer support services. Meanwhile, DeFi seeks to provide a space for investors to trade without intermediaries and maintain privacy.

Each model has its advantages and disadvantages, depending on the investor’s needs. For transparency and privacy, DeFi is the better option, while CeFi offers trust, shared risks, flexibility, and increased investment options.

Leading blockchain development companies can help identify the appropriate financial model for your business and build financial apps on different blockchain platforms.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Net inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs reached $179 million on March 28

    Spot on Chain, a blockchain data monitoring platform, posted on social media that the net inflow of spot bitcoin ETF on March 28th reached 179 million US dollars, a decrease of 26.9% compared to the previous trading day. After 54 trading days, the total net inflow accumulated to 12.13 billion US dollars, which is the level before the last fully negative trading week. BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) and Grayscale's GBTC both saw a significant slowdown in daily inflows and outflows on March 28th.

  • Bitcoin spot ETF had a total net inflow of US$179 million yesterday, and the ETF net asset ratio reached 4.25%

    According to SoSoValue data, the Bitcoin spot ETF had a total net inflow of $179 million yesterday (March 28th, US Eastern Time).Yesterday, Grayscale's ETF GBTC had a net outflow of $104 million, and its historical net outflow is $14.77 billion. The Bitcoin spot ETF with the highest net inflow yesterday was BlackRock's ETF IBIT, with a net inflow of approximately $95.12 million, and its historical total net inflow has reached $13.96 billion. The second is Fidelity's ETF FBTC, with a net inflow of approximately $68.09 million yesterday, and its historical total net inflow has reached $7.56 billion.As of now, the total net asset value of Bitcoin spot ETF is $59.1 billion, and the ETF net asset ratio (market value compared to the total market value of Bitcoin) is 4.25%, with a historical total net inflow of $12.12 billion.

  • Ethereum Inscription ETHS rose over 95% in 24H

    CoinGecko data shows that Ethereum Inscription ETHS has risen by 95.9% in the last 24 hours, now reporting at 7.51 USDT. Earlier, Ethereum founder Vitalik released the latest long article "Ethereum has blobs. Where do we go from here?". As a result of this news, the price of Ethereum Inscription ETHS soared.

  • Binance exec sues Nigeria’s National Security Agency over detention

    According to CoinGape, Tigran Gambaryan, a detained executive of Binance, has filed a lawsuit against the National Security Adviser (NSA) and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in Nigeria. Local media reported that on March 28th, Tigran Gambaryan sued the National Security Agency, accusing it of violating his basic human rights and seeking five major remedies from the court.He urged the court to approve the return of his passport and to release him immediately after more than three weeks of detention. He also requested a ban on future detention in similar investigations and demanded public apologies from the National Security Agency and the EFCC.In addition, he requested that the court pay the full amount of compensation for the lawsuit.

  • Vitalik: As L2 transaction costs decrease, there’s no reason why Ethereum can’t be widely adopted

    After the upgrade and introduction of blobs on Ethereum Dencun, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin shared his insights on the future direction of Ethereum's expansion. Vitalik emphasized the transformation of Ethereum's expansion from basic expansion work to centralized, progressive enhancement. Vitalik also stated that developers' focus will shift to the application layer. Ethereum will maintain its roadmap centered on L2, and applications will migrate from L1 to L2 to benefit from faster and more cost-effective transactions. An upcoming upgrade is Data Availability Sampling (DAS), which aims to increase the data space for each slot to 16 MB. Progressive expansion improvements include gradually increasing blob capacity, improving data compression, and EIP-7623 (aimed at reducing maximum block size). Vitalik pointed out that with the reduction of L2 transaction costs, there is no reason why Ethereum should not be widely adopted.

  • RWA project Midas completes US$8.75 million in seed round financing

    According to Jinse Finance, RWA project Midas has completed a seed round of financing worth $8.75 million, led by BlockTower, Framework, and HV Capital, with participation from institutions such as Coinbase Ventures, Ledger, GSR, Hack VC, Axelar, and FJ Labs.

  • Two Different Sentences for FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried: 25 Years and $11 Billion vs. 16 Months and $8 Billion Losses

    The founder of FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried, has been sentenced to 16 months in prison and charged with eight criminal counts, including money laundering and conspiracy. He was involved in a scheme that caused customers to lose $8 billion and allegedly diverted customer funds to Alameda. Bankman-Fried's lawyers had requested a lighter sentence, but the judge rejected their argument that the collapsed company had vowed to return money to its customers. Prosecutors had sought up to 50 years in prison for Bankman-Fried.

  • SBF ordered to forfeit more than $11 billion

    SBF has been ordered to confiscate more than 11 billion US dollars. SBF has now been sentenced to 25 years in prison.

  • Former CEO of FTX and Alameda Research Sentenced to 25 Years in Prison for Fraud and Money Laundering

    Sam Bankman-Fried, the co-founder and former CEO of FTX and Alameda Research, has been sentenced to 25 years in prison for fraud and money laundering. The judge criticized Bankman-Fried's behavior during the trial and deemed a 25-year sentence to be sufficient. Bankman-Fried's sentence may send a message to the crypto industry and there is no possibility of parole, but he may earn "good time" credit for good behavior while incarcerated. Bankman-Fried was found to have misused over $8 billion in customer funds and will be serving time in prison for his actions. The trial emphasized the importance of not using customers' funds without their knowledge or approval.

  • The Safe Case: How AI and Smart Accounts will Revolutionize Crypto

    Web3’s first billion users may not only be humans, but AI agents, signalling a nascent but growing "agent economy"—an onchain economy run solely by AI agents that is turning the crypto-AI dream team into a reality.