Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Bitcoin Ban or Bitcoin to $1 Million? Charlie Munger vs. Cathy Wood

Validated Individual Expert

Do you remember they used to break the class up into boys vs. girls in elementary school? It forces you to feel instant pride and camaraderie when you are teamed up against the opposite sex, whether for a class spelling bee, a game of Red Rover, or any other contest to prove your sex is better.

Today's crypto news has two conflicting stories from each sex. On one side, we have Charlie Munger, the 99-year-old billionaire who is the vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway. Warren Buffett has described Munger as his right-hand man; together, they are the Batman and Robin of the investing world.

On the other side, we have Cathie Wood, the 67-year-old founder and CEO of Ark invest. Her flagship Ark Innovation fund crushed the market with 45% annualized returns until running into some issues last year with the tech crash. Wood is one of the most prominent and outspoken women in the investing space, and her fund focuses on identifying and investing in disruptive technologies.

These two brilliant investors sit in different camps regarding Bitcoin and crypto. Munger has described Bitcoin as "disgusting and contrary to the interests of civilization." His descriptions are even more colorful when he says, "I avoid it as if it were an open sewer, full of malicious organisms," and "I regard it as almost insane to buy this stuff or to trade in it."

Meanwhile, Wood has a different mindset. She has said things like,"Bitcoin is bigger than Apple, which is a pretty good idea." Cathie Wood has also said, "Bitcoin (is) truly a money revolution," Wood said. "It's a very important insurance policy for countries that don't have the dollar as a reserve currency as we do."

So, we have two investing powerhouses with disparate views. Both names have been in the news recently. Munger suggests the US follow in China's footsteps and ban Bitcoin and crypto assets. And Cathie Wood has recently called for a $1–$1.5 million Bitcoin by 2030. If you aren't an investing powerhouse, who should you believe?

Munger's argument

Yesterday, the Wall Street Journal printed an opinion piece by Munger titled Why America Should Ban Crypto. Munger brings up valid points about how many crypto projects launch in an unregulated space, pay promoters to pump the price and then dump the coins on investors. He describes the space as:

“A cryptocurrency is not a currency, not a commodity, and not a security. Instead, it’s a gambling contract with a nearly 100% edge for the house, entered into in a country where gambling contracts are traditionally regulated only by states that compete in laxity. Obviously the U.S. should now enact a new federal law that prevents this from happening.”

Munger supports his claims to ban crypto on China's decision to ban crypto because they believe it will do more harm than good. He also refers to a depression in England during the 1700s. In response, the English parliament banned public trading in new common stocks for 100 years. Munger states:

“And, in that 100 years, England made by far the biggest national contribution to the march of civilization as it led strongly in both the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution and, to boot, spawned off a promising little country called the United States.”

Cathie Wood's argument

During interviews, Cathie Wood reiterated her bullish outlook on Bitcoin and placed a $1 million price target on the asset by 2030. In addition, Ark Invest wrote their Big Ideas paper earlier this week and the firm said this about Bitcoin:

“Bitcoin’s long-term opportunity is strengthening. Despite a turbulent year, Bitcoin has not skipped a beat. Its network fundamentals have strengthened and its holder base has become more long-term focused.”

Ark's report states their bull thesis for Bitcoin is $1.48 million in 2030. Meanwhile, the bear case is $258,500, and their base case is $682,800 in 2030. Further, Ark writes:

“Contagion caused by centralized counterparties has elevated Bitcoin’s value propositions: decentralization, auditability and transparency. Its network fundamentals have strengthened and its holder base has become more long-term focused.”

The report also highlights Bitcoin's CAGR over the past five years compared with other asset classes.

If you aren't familiar with CAGR (I wasn't when I read this), here's a definition from Investopedia: "The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is the rate of return (RoR) that would be required for an investment to grow from its beginning balance to its ending balance, assuming the profits were reinvested at the end of each period of the investment's life span."

Thoughts on Munger's perspective

As much as I want to tear Charlie Munger's argument apart and call it a conspiracy theory by a 99-year-old who may have a perspective from the last century, he is accurate with some of his depictions. For example, I purchased crypto assets promoted by influencers like Bitboy, who admitted they were compensated to manipulate their audience.

I'm certain many other influencers were doing the same thing but won't openly admit it. Even I promoted ROI projects that sounded too good to be true, and unfortunately, for many investors it was. I wrote about Celsius, Voyager, and BlockFi, and they stole billions from ordinary people and plenty of money from me.

I'm afraid I have to disagree that crypto assets are gambling contracts with a 100% edge for the house. Comparing it to gambling devalues the value propositions that crypto and blockchain provide. Some of these value propositions include smart contracts, digital transactions without the need for a middleman, and an alternative to central bank-managed fiat.

I could argue that stocks should be banned because it allows companies like McDonald's, Smith & Wesson, and Altria. These companies make the world obese, produce and sell guns and ammo, and peddle nicotine addictiHowever, justJust because I am not a fan of what they represent doesn't mean that all stocks should be banned.

Copying anything China does is a bad argument. We followed China's lead on the lockdowns, and there's plenty of debate on how effective that was. Most people want to avoid switching spots with Chinese citizens. And I could use the same argument to say that the state should take over control of many things because China has less gun violence. Munger is just cherry-picking here.

Finally, comparing crypto assets to 1700s England is picking a metaphor beyond most people's comprehension and historical knowledge. In 1933, the US confiscated American gold. In 1974, Americans were able to own gold again. By this time, the US dollar was the world's reserve currency backed by the government's full faith. This worked out well for Americans who didn't own gold in 1933. Those who sold their gold for $20.34 per ounce to the government would have been better off holding the gold than the dollars.

My point with this comparison is that bringing up unrelated history doesn't fit our technology-driven world.

Thoughts on Cathie Wood's perspective

I write about crypto and invest in crypto, so I am biased towards Cathie Wood, and Ark invests arguments. However, this doesn't mean there aren't potential weaknesses in her views. Just because something performed well in the past five years doesn't guarantee future success.

For example, let's look at gold again. In 2000, gold was selling for under $400 per ounce. By its peak in 2011, gold had nearly hit $2000 per ounce. Over one decade later, gold has yet to do much and right now is nearing the $2000 per ounce level. I'm certain gold investors were saying similar things about gold after 2011 that Wood is saying today.

I agree with the Ark's opinion that Bitcoin has become more battle-tested due to the collapse of centralized entities. However, there are potential drawbacks to this statement as well. For example, the government can come in with over-regulation, and people like Munger can scare ordinary investors from embracing the space.

Key Takeaways

If we knew that Bitcoin would be $1 million or 2030 or if it would be banned like in China, it would make our investment decisions easy. But, both of these investors are concerned with their and their investors' best interests. Munger has little exposure to crypto, and Wood has significant exposure to crypto.

This means the onus is on you to decide your opinions and invest in the conclusions you can draw. I've chosen the Bitcoin and crypto side. The world is innovating because of technology, and Bitcoin and crypto are a financial evolution. Therefore, I invest in the space. However, you may agree with Munger that it's simply gambling and stacked 100% against you. If that's your thesis, Berkshire Hathaway stock has performed extremely well for its investors.

What are your thoughts? I'm confident the algorithm has brought you here because you are pro-crypto. But maybe you aren't? Share your thoughts in the responses. Do you believe both have credible arguments or are they being loyal to their investors?

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • MAS: Singapore is working on global first-tier fund tokenization regulation

    Chia Der Jiun, Managing Director of the Monetary Authority of Singapore, introduced some fund tokenization pilots at an event for asset managers. These pilots are part of the Project Guardian and MAS Global Layer 1 (GL1) tokenization plans. Chia Der Jiun emphasized the advantages of tokenization in real-time settlement and process automation, which can improve efficiency and achieve greater customization of funds. UK asset management company Schroders and fund distribution platform Calastone are exploring this as part of the Project Guardian public blockchain trial in Singapore. A recent survey by Calastone showed that 96% of asset management companies in the Asia-Pacific region plan to launch tokenized products within three years. Chia stated that as these Project Guardian pilot projects approach commercialization, MAS is working with the pilot project managers to study the legal and regulatory treatment and impact of tokenized investment funds."

  • Indonesia's Financial Services Authority to Regulate Crypto Industry in 2025 with Evaluation in Regulatory Sandbox

    Indonesia's Financial Services Authority (OJK) will take over regulation of the crypto industry from the commodities agency Bappebti. Crypto firms must undergo evaluation in a regulatory sandbox before being licensed to operate in the country. The OJK aims to prioritize consumer protection and education, and firms operating without evaluation in the sandbox will be considered illegal. The sandbox provides a safe and isolated environment for testing and innovation development, helping to enhance security and responsible management in the financial sector. Once under OJK's oversight, crypto assets will likely be reclassified as financial instruments.

  • The Shenzhen Illegal Fund Raising Prevention Office issued a risk warning on the "DDO digital options" business

    The Shenzhen Office for Preventing and Dealing with Illegal Fundraising issued a risk warning regarding the "DDO digital option" business. The activities related to the DDO digital option business conducted in the name of Dingyifeng International are essentially the issuance and trading of virtual currencies. According to the "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks of Speculation in Virtual Currency Trading" jointly issued by ten departments including the People's Bank of China in September 2021, it is clear that virtual currency-related business activities are illegal financial activities, and overseas virtual currency exchanges providing services to residents within China are also illegal financial activities. The activities conducted by Dingyifeng International in the name of serving residents within China are suspected of illegal fundraising and other illegal financial activities. Our office has organized relevant departments to carry out work, resolutely deal with illegal fundraising and criminal activities, and seriously investigate the legal responsibilities of relevant personnel. (Shenzhen Local Financial Supervision and Administration Bureau)

  • The Hong Kong Legislative Council plans to review the relevant stable currency consultation and sandbox legislation at the end of this year or next year

    Hong Kong legislator Wu Jiezhuang revealed that Hong Kong will release stablecoin consultation and sandbox (computer security mechanism), which will allow the industry to innovate digital asset projects in the sandbox environment. Relevant legislation will be reviewed in the Legislative Council at the end of this year or next year, which will help the entire digital asset industry ecosystem. Hong Kong has been improving the digital asset (virtual asset) market on different legal levels. Last year, there were regulations on virtual currency trading platforms and issuance systems.

  • Vitalik: Humanity needs to create a world where blockchain and artificial intelligence work together

    Vitalik Buterin, the founder of Ethereum, stated at BiddleAsia 2024 held at Signiel Seoul in the Songpa district on March 28 that artificial intelligence is a huge market and its importance is increasing day by day. We need to create a world where blockchain and artificial intelligence work together. Artificial intelligence can now create applications with 100 to 500 lines of code. Vitalik also stated that the ability to write 10,000 lines of code can eliminate most of the bugs in the Ethereum virtual machine.

  • South Korean RWA blockchain technology development company PARAMETA completed a new round of financing of approximately US$7.5 million

    South Korean RWA blockchain technology development company PARAMETA announced the completion of a new round of financing of KRW 9 billion (approximately $7.5 million), with Shinhan Hyperconnect Investment Fund under Shinhan Venture Investment and Korea Asset Investment & Securities participating. As of now, the company's total financing has reached KRW 25 billion (approximately $20.8 million). PARAMETA plans to use this investment to expand its own blockchain technology research and development capabilities to meet RWA technology needs and expand from core technologies such as engines/chains to service applications. Relevant services are expected to be launched within the year.

  • Incheon, South Korea launches blockchain hub city

    South Korea announced on the 28th that it will establish a blockchain technology innovation support center in the Songdo Michu Building in the second half of this year. Incheon was finally selected as a participant in the "2024 Regional Blockchain Technology Innovation Support Center Construction Project" jointly organized by the Korean Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning and the Korea Internet & Security Agency (KISA). Incheon is the third region to be selected after Busan and Daegu. In February last year, Incheon established a dedicated blockchain department and formulated a four-year plan to create a blockchain center city, which was promised by Incheon Mayor Liu Zhengfu. After being selected, Incheon will receive KRW 1.8 billion in government funding.

  • BTC breaks through $70,000

    The market shows that BTC has broken through $70,000 and is now reporting at $70,003.6. The intraday decline has reached 0.58%, and the market fluctuation is large. Please be prepared for risk control.

  • Base TVL exceeded US$3 billion, with an increase of 71.79% in the past 7 days

    According to the latest data from L2beat, supported by cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase, the total locked value (TVL) on the Base chain, a layer 2 solution for Ethereum, has surpassed $3 billion. At the time of writing, it has dropped to $2.99 billion, with a 7-day increase of 71.79%, reaching a new historical high.

  • The Oklahoma Legislature yesterday passed a bill to protect Bitcoin rights

    Mining company Hiveon posted on social media, saying that yesterday, the Oklahoma State Council passed a bill with a vote of 81:1 aimed at protecting Bitcoin rights, the result of efforts by Dennis Porter, Satoshi Action Fund, and the Oklahoma Bitcoin Association. The rights bill includes mining, buying and selling Bitcoin, self-custody, and running nodes; the bill was passed by the Senate and signed by the governor. The "mining rights" bill had previously passed in Montana and Missouri in 2023.