Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Bank Runs, USDC Depeg, Bailouts, and The Strengthening Case for Crypto

Validated Individual Expert

The legacy financial system is beginning to crack. Over the weekend, people panicked over Silicon Valley Bank's inability to honor withdrawal.

Money/fiat is funny. It is never really, fully yours if you hold it in a bank. When you entrust the bank to save your deposit, they are entitled to use it in various forms of investment. It’s called fractional reserves, and it’s bad because when every customer wants to withdraw their money at the same time, they won’t have enough cash.

In the case of SVB, customers’ deposit is used to buy government bonds, which due to rate hike, their value have plummeted lately. When you withdraw your money out of the bank, they’ll have to sell the bond at loss. Then there’s not enough money for everybody because of the losses. And no customers want to get less money than they deposited.

Bank failure strengthens the crypto case on self-custody and decentralized money

If only there was a means to custody your own money securely without any help from a third party. Yep, blockchain technology is here for that exact reason.

Crypto assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum don’t have counterparty risks. This is unlike how most banks operate today where you entrust your wealth to somebody else, and you practically are in the dark about how your money going to be used by the banks — and they will use it.

Why could bank failure erase a large swath of wealth?

With the current banking system, capital is centralized, as in its locations. Combined with capitalism, over the years we are seeing capital concentrated in institutions that have become ‘too big to fail’.

The amount, the location, and now, with human money managers who can do anything with the capital, recklessness is bound to happen. Is a general rule in investing that when the money gets larger (the amount), the harder it is to invest it.

It is better if wealth is dispersed among many hands of individuals and institutions. Especially for most individuals, the reason they put money in the bank is just for safekeeping, not being engaged in speculative investment. A hardware wallet does it better than bank workers with how fractional reserves work currently.

Death to fractional reserves

Fractional reserve is a flawed system that won’t go anywhere anytime soon. In The Reasons Why The Government Hates Crypto, I mentioned how Crypto threatens the fractional reserves system.

For the economy is growing optimally, every individual with an income must do two things: 1. Spending, making them consumers, and ensuring demands and economic activities. 2. Savings, but with a quote. Saving here doesn’t mean putting your money under the mattress, but rather lending it to the bank so they can loan it to someone else (eg. as capital to start a business.)

Money shall never be idle. It’s in the big interest of the government and big banks that money is always moving — so the banks can charge fees with every transaction. Crypto doesn’t really fulfill this vision. It does not need middlemen.

Furthermore, fractional reserve banking can create huge leverage that benefits the banks tremendously.

If A saves $100 in the bank, and the bank loans out 90% of it to B, which is $90. B then saves this $90 in the bank, and so on… we can be calculated the final balance on the bank’s book using this formula:

sum = a / (1 — r), where a is the first term and r is the common ratio. In this case, a = $100 and r = 0.9.

So,

sum = $100 / (1–0.9) = $100 / 0.1 = $1000

Therefore, the final amount of balance created out of the leverage is $1000, for a mere $100. The bank would count the $1000 as their assets, not the initial $100. Hence it’s safe to say the whole modern economy, the actual number not counting the leverage is much lower to the point of one-tenth.

Bailouts also strengthen the case for trustless monetary policy

The ending to the SVB bank run is almost anti-climactic. In a move that is predicted by government skeptics, SVB ended up getting bailed out. Of course, they don’t package it that way, and specifically, mentioned that no taxpayer money is used.

Of course, they’re right about the part where they don’t use taxpayer money. Instead, we’re all going to pay it through inflation, the secret tax.

What is this government emergency fund, and where does it comes from? Most likely it will come through the blank check of the FED, which practically has an infinite amount of money. This fund will negate the effect of Powell’s rate hike, as it is putting money back into circulation.

Everything about this screams stupidity, and TradFi just willingly shoots itself in the foot. Bailouts set a bad precedent. A moral hazard. Banks are now even more encouraged to speculate irresponsibly knowing they won’t face any consequences.

The free market crypto economy

Bailouts and government interventions are against the principle of a free market economy. With bailouts, bad decision-making will never get punished. It’s not natural, and threaten the balance of the economy in a various way. (for example, inflation only exist after the FED was established.)

In many ways, we can boast how the crypto economy is much freer.

Reckless behaviors get punished, no matter whether you are small money or big money. (3AC, FTX, Terra/Luna.) The frequency of wealth destruction events in crypto is as often as wealth creation ones. Unlike in TradFi, the government never let the economy fail and experience its natural cycle.

Crypto also has a way to automatically adjust the interest rate — or in crypto terms, yield. It goes up and down based on market data instead of human decisions (i.e. Ethereum Staking Yield.)

Crypto is also a winner in terms of access. As everyone can participate without restriction based on location, nationality, wealth, and other personal characteristics. Everyone can loan, lend, and trade assets. No accredited investors rule no nationality rules and no discrimination.

The volatility of the crypto market, and the unforgiving nature toward its losers, will encourage people to wisen up in the long run. Ironically, this makes crypto less ‘degen’ over time. In fact, there is a growing sentiment that traditional banking practices may be even riskier and more akin to gambling than crypto investments. A joke among crypto folks that’s been circulating around nowadays as news of bank difficulties shows up: Banks are more degens than us, as it turned out.

Centralized stablecoins are our biggest weakness

The SVB saga also unravels our biggest time-ticking bomb: The centralized stablecoins. Circle revealed that it has some of its cash reserves on SVB, to the tune of 3.3B.

Of course, they managed to avoid the disaster as the bailout news comes in. But during the period of uncertainties, we can see the extent of panic across the market.

  1. USDC lost its value and traded up to $0.89 per dollar.
  2. Other algorithmic stablecoins that were partly backed by USDC were also de-pegged.
  3. The popular ‘hopium’ that a stablecoin failure would lead to people flocking to Bitcoin and Ethereum, was not happening. Instead, crypto institutions are withdrawing USDC to convert to fiat.

4. There were reliable non-USD-backed algostables people can run into, such as RAI. However, the liquidity is so low there isn’t enough RAI for everybody.

The industry knows how risky decentralized stablecoins are. It has counterparty risks because the fiat backing is stored in bank accounts. A stablecoin apocalypse is something that always exists in the back of our mind — be it as a joke we uncomfortably laugh at, or some kind of doomporn when we’re in a sour mood.

We just got a peek at it and it ain’t pretty.

Our crypto isn’t exactly ready

The failure of the traditional banking system is a good opportunity for crypto to introduce ourselves — once again — to the skeptics. This is the reason why crypto exists. These are the alternatives we can offer. The world has just witnessed an eye-opening moment on how money, finance, are markets that it knows of are inherently flawed. Silicon Valley Bank's failure will be the first among the money. (As I am writing this, news comes out that bank giant Credit Suisse is in trouble.)

However, I am a crypto proponent who admits that crypto isn’t exactly ready to welcome new capital inflows, especially at the scale of wealth the traditional banking system is currently servicing.

  • We don’t have reliable decentralized stablecoins yet.
  • Lack of infrastructure, from dummy-proof wallets to secure bridges to transaction throughput and blockspace.
  • Issues with fees.
  • The UX should be designed to cater to users of all skill levels, not just highly skilled tech users.
  • Security issues. We just got another major 7 figure hack on Euler Finance.
  • MEVs.

We have a lot of homework, and seemingly endless problems we must solve as an industry. But at least, in many basic things such as the free market principles and sound, trustless monetary system, we’re moving in the right direction.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • SBF ordered to forfeit more than $11 billion

    SBF has been ordered to confiscate more than 11 billion US dollars. SBF has now been sentenced to 25 years in prison.

  • Former CEO of FTX and Alameda Research Sentenced to 25 Years in Prison for Fraud and Money Laundering

    Sam Bankman-Fried, the co-founder and former CEO of FTX and Alameda Research, has been sentenced to 25 years in prison for fraud and money laundering. The judge criticized Bankman-Fried's behavior during the trial and deemed a 25-year sentence to be sufficient. Bankman-Fried's sentence may send a message to the crypto industry and there is no possibility of parole, but he may earn "good time" credit for good behavior while incarcerated. Bankman-Fried was found to have misused over $8 billion in customer funds and will be serving time in prison for his actions. The trial emphasized the importance of not using customers' funds without their knowledge or approval.

  • Web3 AI training company FLock raises $6 million in seed funding

    Web3 artificial intelligence training company FLock has raised $6 million in seed funding led by Lightspeed Faction and Tagus Capital. FLock will use these funds to develop its team and build a federated learning-driven artificial intelligence training platform.

  • Prisma: Vault owners need to prohibit delegation of contracts related to LST and LRT

    The LSD stablecoin protocol Prisma Finance stated in a post that for vault owners, please prohibit delegating authorization of the LST contract starting with 0xcC72 and the LRT contract starting with 0xC3eA.

  • MAS: Singapore is working on global first-tier fund tokenization regulation

    Chia Der Jiun, Managing Director of the Monetary Authority of Singapore, introduced some fund tokenization pilots at an event for asset managers. These pilots are part of the Project Guardian and MAS Global Layer 1 (GL1) tokenization plans. Chia Der Jiun emphasized the advantages of tokenization in real-time settlement and process automation, which can improve efficiency and achieve greater customization of funds. UK asset management company Schroders and fund distribution platform Calastone are exploring this as part of the Project Guardian public blockchain trial in Singapore. A recent survey by Calastone showed that 96% of asset management companies in the Asia-Pacific region plan to launch tokenized products within three years. Chia stated that as these Project Guardian pilot projects approach commercialization, MAS is working with the pilot project managers to study the legal and regulatory treatment and impact of tokenized investment funds."

  • Indonesia's Financial Services Authority to Regulate Crypto Industry in 2025 with Evaluation in Regulatory Sandbox

    Indonesia's Financial Services Authority (OJK) will take over regulation of the crypto industry from the commodities agency Bappebti. Crypto firms must undergo evaluation in a regulatory sandbox before being licensed to operate in the country. The OJK aims to prioritize consumer protection and education, and firms operating without evaluation in the sandbox will be considered illegal. The sandbox provides a safe and isolated environment for testing and innovation development, helping to enhance security and responsible management in the financial sector. Once under OJK's oversight, crypto assets will likely be reclassified as financial instruments.

  • The Shenzhen Illegal Fund Raising Prevention Office issued a risk warning on the "DDO digital options" business

    The Shenzhen Office for Preventing and Dealing with Illegal Fundraising issued a risk warning regarding the "DDO digital option" business. The activities related to the DDO digital option business conducted in the name of Dingyifeng International are essentially the issuance and trading of virtual currencies. According to the "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks of Speculation in Virtual Currency Trading" jointly issued by ten departments including the People's Bank of China in September 2021, it is clear that virtual currency-related business activities are illegal financial activities, and overseas virtual currency exchanges providing services to residents within China are also illegal financial activities. The activities conducted by Dingyifeng International in the name of serving residents within China are suspected of illegal fundraising and other illegal financial activities. Our office has organized relevant departments to carry out work, resolutely deal with illegal fundraising and criminal activities, and seriously investigate the legal responsibilities of relevant personnel. (Shenzhen Local Financial Supervision and Administration Bureau)

  • The Hong Kong Legislative Council plans to review the relevant stable currency consultation and sandbox legislation at the end of this year or next year

    Hong Kong legislator Wu Jiezhuang revealed that Hong Kong will release stablecoin consultation and sandbox (computer security mechanism), which will allow the industry to innovate digital asset projects in the sandbox environment. Relevant legislation will be reviewed in the Legislative Council at the end of this year or next year, which will help the entire digital asset industry ecosystem. Hong Kong has been improving the digital asset (virtual asset) market on different legal levels. Last year, there were regulations on virtual currency trading platforms and issuance systems.

  • Vitalik: Humanity needs to create a world where blockchain and artificial intelligence work together

    Vitalik Buterin, the founder of Ethereum, stated at BiddleAsia 2024 held at Signiel Seoul in the Songpa district on March 28 that artificial intelligence is a huge market and its importance is increasing day by day. We need to create a world where blockchain and artificial intelligence work together. Artificial intelligence can now create applications with 100 to 500 lines of code. Vitalik also stated that the ability to write 10,000 lines of code can eliminate most of the bugs in the Ethereum virtual machine.

  • South Korean RWA blockchain technology development company PARAMETA completed a new round of financing of approximately US$7.5 million

    South Korean RWA blockchain technology development company PARAMETA announced the completion of a new round of financing of KRW 9 billion (approximately $7.5 million), with Shinhan Hyperconnect Investment Fund under Shinhan Venture Investment and Korea Asset Investment & Securities participating. As of now, the company's total financing has reached KRW 25 billion (approximately $20.8 million). PARAMETA plans to use this investment to expand its own blockchain technology research and development capabilities to meet RWA technology needs and expand from core technologies such as engines/chains to service applications. Relevant services are expected to be launched within the year.