Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

5 Principles for Best Tokenomic Designs

As more and more projects launch their own tokens and design their tokenomics it’s essential to understand how to design a tokenomic model that works. Unfortunately, many projects simply ‘copy paste’ other projects tokenomic designs without thinking through whether their model is a right fit for them.

Designing Tokenomics

What do the best tokenomics models and designs look like? Let’s look at five principles to consider that best tokenomic models use.

Five principles the best designed tokenomics use

Tokenomics, one of the big innovations of web3, bring a lot to the table. Done right they can supercharge your product. Messed up, they can bring it crashing down.

Here are five principles to consider when designing the best tokenomics:

  1. Understanding why you have a token in the first place. What is the purpose of the token? What goal is it serving? Without a clear understanding of the token’s purpose, it’s difficult to design a successful tokenomic model. There are seven reasons to launch a token. Best tokenomic designs know exactly why they’re launching a token and what purpose it serves.
  2. Understanding when the right time to distribute your token is. Too many projects launch their tokens too early (or too late) and end up messing up their project. It’s important to consider the timing of token distribution and how it will impact the project’s growth. Tokens are not startup equity, although many projects treat them like that. This mismatch causes lots of tokens to fail. The best tokenomic designs match the ‘when’ of their token to the stage their product is at.
  3. Understanding the supply and demand dynamics behind your token. Who wants your token? Why is someone using it? Who’s selling your token? How are tokens entering the market? When and how many tokens? These are all important questions to consider when designing a tokenomic model. Best designed tokenomics match their forecasted supply and demand so the market can absorb demand without undue price spikes and shortages.
  4. Token liquidity. How can people access your tokens? What is the expected volume? Ensuring that your tokens have liquidity is crucial for the success of the project and the growth of the network.
  5. Security. The best tokenomics take all edge cases into account and preserve product, token and user security. This means thinking about long term viability and financial attack surfaces.

By considering these five principles, you can design a tokenomic model that serves your project’s goals and incentivizes participation.

Who are the web3 projects with the best tokenomic designs

Looking at these four factors, let’s answer the question of which projects have the best tokenomics in web3?

These three projects are great examples of great tokenomic designs.

  1. MakerDAO
  2. Bitcoin
  3. Thorchain

Others with good, but not great, tokenomic designs are:

  1. Liquity
  2. Curve

Note that this isn’t an exhaustive list, just examples, and there are some parts to a tokenomic design that I haven’t included.

An analysis of MakerDAO’s tokenomics

MakerDAO’s tokenomics is made up of three tokens: DAI, MKR and ETH. Simply, the system works as an on chain ‘central bank’ where users deposit ETH as collateral to withdraw DAI, a USD pegged stablecoin. MKR is the bridge token used to add collateral, incentivize participation & governance, and ensure the stability of the network. MKR is created and sold off to pay back DAI loans whenever the price of ETH falls, and is also used to pay loan fees and liquidation penalties.

Why Token

The why of MakerDAO’s token design is very clear: the system is designed to create a stable coin based on ETH as collateral. But ETH is a volatile asset, which doesn’t make it the best collateral. Hence a third asset is needed to backstop the protocol — MKR. MKR can only act as collateral if it has intrinsic value, which it accrues by protocol mechanisms such as burn and governance.

When Token

From the early days of the protocol MakerDAOs tokenomic structure has been complete and token supply has increased in accordance with actual demand. This meant there was never a supply overhand due to lack of product-token fit and the tokenomics had real utility at launch.

Token supply and demand

MakerDAO didn’t launch with a perfectly matched token supply & demand. For several years supply far outweighed the burn mechanism in the protocol, but during the 2021 bull market things started to even out.

Source: Maker May 2021 Financial Presentation

When balancing the supply and burn from the demand during this period, approximately 4% of MKR got burned, which is equivalent to many public company’s stock buybacks. While this does decrease during bear markets, and it’s not the best to take the best bull market as a benchmark, the point remains the same. With good market dynamics, the supply and demand of MKR balance out nicely. This wouldn’t have worked out this way without MakerDAO launching with most of their tokens and the market reaching an equilibrium.

Token liquidity

MakerDAO launched with plenty of liquidity and since MKR is one of the original tokens in the space, they’ve been listed on exchanges since the early days and the team didn’t hoard tokens, meaning the token could be distributed to many different holders.

How do the best designed tokenomics look?

The best tokenomics projects are designed with purpose, timing, supply and demand dynamics, liquidity and security and long term viability in mind.

By understanding the purpose of the token and the right time to distribute it, as well as considering the supply and demand dynamics and ensuring liquidity, a successful tokenomic model can be created that serves the project’s goals and incentivizes participation.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Grayscale ETH Trust negative premium rate is 22.77%

    According to ChainCatcher news and Coinglass data, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust Fund (GBTC) has a premium rate of 0.02%. The Grayscale ETH Trust has a negative premium rate of 22.77%, and the ETC Trust has a negative premium rate of 36.58%.In addition, the Grayscale BCH Trust has a premium rate of 238.13%, the LTC Trust has a premium rate of 380.60%, the SOL Trust has a premium rate of 515.93%, the MANA Trust has a premium rate of 726.65%, the LINK Trust has a premium rate of 713.66%, and the FIL Trust has a premium rate of 3057.89%.

  • Net inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs reached $179 million on March 28

    Spot on Chain, a blockchain data monitoring platform, posted on social media that the net inflow of spot bitcoin ETF on March 28th reached 179 million US dollars, a decrease of 26.9% compared to the previous trading day. After 54 trading days, the total net inflow accumulated to 12.13 billion US dollars, which is the level before the last fully negative trading week. BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) and Grayscale's GBTC both saw a significant slowdown in daily inflows and outflows on March 28th.

  • Bitcoin spot ETF had a total net inflow of US$179 million yesterday, and the ETF net asset ratio reached 4.25%

    According to SoSoValue data, the Bitcoin spot ETF had a total net inflow of $179 million yesterday (March 28th, US Eastern Time).Yesterday, Grayscale's ETF GBTC had a net outflow of $104 million, and its historical net outflow is $14.77 billion. The Bitcoin spot ETF with the highest net inflow yesterday was BlackRock's ETF IBIT, with a net inflow of approximately $95.12 million, and its historical total net inflow has reached $13.96 billion. The second is Fidelity's ETF FBTC, with a net inflow of approximately $68.09 million yesterday, and its historical total net inflow has reached $7.56 billion.As of now, the total net asset value of Bitcoin spot ETF is $59.1 billion, and the ETF net asset ratio (market value compared to the total market value of Bitcoin) is 4.25%, with a historical total net inflow of $12.12 billion.

  • Ethereum Inscription ETHS rose over 95% in 24H

    CoinGecko data shows that Ethereum Inscription ETHS has risen by 95.9% in the last 24 hours, now reporting at 7.51 USDT. Earlier, Ethereum founder Vitalik released the latest long article "Ethereum has blobs. Where do we go from here?". As a result of this news, the price of Ethereum Inscription ETHS soared.

  • Binance exec sues Nigeria’s National Security Agency over detention

    According to CoinGape, Tigran Gambaryan, a detained executive of Binance, has filed a lawsuit against the National Security Adviser (NSA) and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in Nigeria. Local media reported that on March 28th, Tigran Gambaryan sued the National Security Agency, accusing it of violating his basic human rights and seeking five major remedies from the court.He urged the court to approve the return of his passport and to release him immediately after more than three weeks of detention. He also requested a ban on future detention in similar investigations and demanded public apologies from the National Security Agency and the EFCC.In addition, he requested that the court pay the full amount of compensation for the lawsuit.

  • Vitalik: As L2 transaction costs decrease, there’s no reason why Ethereum can’t be widely adopted

    After the upgrade and introduction of blobs on Ethereum Dencun, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin shared his insights on the future direction of Ethereum's expansion. Vitalik emphasized the transformation of Ethereum's expansion from basic expansion work to centralized, progressive enhancement. Vitalik also stated that developers' focus will shift to the application layer. Ethereum will maintain its roadmap centered on L2, and applications will migrate from L1 to L2 to benefit from faster and more cost-effective transactions. An upcoming upgrade is Data Availability Sampling (DAS), which aims to increase the data space for each slot to 16 MB. Progressive expansion improvements include gradually increasing blob capacity, improving data compression, and EIP-7623 (aimed at reducing maximum block size). Vitalik pointed out that with the reduction of L2 transaction costs, there is no reason why Ethereum should not be widely adopted.

  • RWA project Midas completes US$8.75 million in seed round financing

    According to Jinse Finance, RWA project Midas has completed a seed round of financing worth $8.75 million, led by BlockTower, Framework, and HV Capital, with participation from institutions such as Coinbase Ventures, Ledger, GSR, Hack VC, Axelar, and FJ Labs.

  • Two Different Sentences for FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried: 25 Years and $11 Billion vs. 16 Months and $8 Billion Losses

    The founder of FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried, has been sentenced to 16 months in prison and charged with eight criminal counts, including money laundering and conspiracy. He was involved in a scheme that caused customers to lose $8 billion and allegedly diverted customer funds to Alameda. Bankman-Fried's lawyers had requested a lighter sentence, but the judge rejected their argument that the collapsed company had vowed to return money to its customers. Prosecutors had sought up to 50 years in prison for Bankman-Fried.

  • SBF ordered to forfeit more than $11 billion

    SBF has been ordered to confiscate more than 11 billion US dollars. SBF has now been sentenced to 25 years in prison.

  • The Safe Case: How AI and Smart Accounts will Revolutionize Crypto

    Web3’s first billion users may not only be humans, but AI agents, signalling a nascent but growing "agent economy"—an onchain economy run solely by AI agents that is turning the crypto-AI dream team into a reality.